Keyword: booster
Paper Title Other Keywords Page
MOA4IO02 Recent Progress in High Intensity Operation of the Fermilab Accelerator Complex ion, proton, target, experiment 54
 
  • M.E. Convery
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
 
  We report on the status of the Fermilab accelerator complex. Beam delivery to the neutrino experiments surpassed our goals for the past year. The Proton Improvement Plan is well underway with successful 15 Hz beam operation. Beam power of 700 kW to the NOvA experiment was demonstrated and will be routine in the next year. We are also preparing the Muon Campus to commission beam to the g-2 experiment.  
slides icon Slides MOA4IO02 [3.574 MB]  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-MOA4IO02  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
MOPOB28 Progress on the Design of a Perpendicularly Biased 2nd Harmonic Cavity for the Fermilab Booster ion, cavity, simulation, injection 130
 
  • R.L. Madrak, J.E. Dey, K.L. Duel, J. Kuharik, W. Pellico, J. Reid, G.V. Romanov, M. Slabaugh, D. Sun, C.-Y. Tan, I. Terechkine
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
 
  A perpendicular biased 2nd harmonic cavity is being designed and built for the Fermilab Booster. Its purpose is to flatten the bucket at injection and thus change the longitudinal beam distribution to decrease space charge effects. It can also help with transition crossing. The cavity frequency range is 76 - 106 MHz. It is modeled using CST microwave studio and COMSOL. The power amplifier will use the same tetrode as is used for the fundamental mode cavities in the Fermilab Booster (Y567B). We discuss recent progress on the cavity design, plans for testing the tuner's garnet material, and tests of the power source.  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-MOPOB28  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUPOA17 A Longitudinal Digital Mode Damper System for the Fermilab Booster ion, cavity, damping, feedback 320
 
  • N. Eddy, W. Pellico, A. Semenov, D.C. Voy, A.M. Waller
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
 
  Funding: This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359.
The Fermilab Booster accelerates bunches and accelerates proton beams from 400 MeV to 8 GeV. During the acceleration the Radio Frequency (RF) cavities are swept from 38MHz to 52.8MHz and requires crossing through transition where accelerating phase is shifted 90 degrees. In order to keep the beam stable and minimize losses and emittance growth a longitudinal damping system is required. This has traditionally been done by dedicated analog electronics designed to operate on specific beam modes for frequencies of instabilities. A complete digital implementation has been developed for this same purpose. The new digital system features and performance are detailed.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-TUPOA17  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUPOB04 A More Compact Design for the JLEIC Ion Pre-Booster Ring ion, injection, dipole, linac 483
 
  • B. Mustapha, P.N. Ostroumov
    ANL, Argonne, USA
  • B. Erdelyi
    Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
 
  Funding: This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Physics, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357 for ANL
The original design of the JLEIC pre-booster was a 3-GeV figure-8 shaped synchrotron with a circumference of about 240 m. In the current baseline design, the 3-GeV pre-booster was converted into an 8-GeV booster of the same shape and size but using super-ferric magnets with fields up to 3 Tesla. In order to limit the foot-print of the JLEIC ion complex and reduce its total cost, we have designed a more compact and cost-effective octagonal 3-GeV ring about half the size of the original one. At 3 GeV, the figure-8 shape is not required to preserve ion polarization; Siberian snakes with reasonable magnetic fields can be used for spin correction. As the ion collider ring requires an injection energy of at least 8 GeV, we propose to use the existing electron storage ring, which is part of the electron complex, as a large booster for the ions up to 11 GeV. The design optimization of the pre-booster ring will be presented leading to the final octagonal ring design. Preliminary beam simulations will also be presented and discussed.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-TUPOB04  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUPOB05 An Alternative Approach for the JLEIC Ion Accelerator Complex ion, collider, linac, proton 486
 
  • B. Mustapha, Z.A. Conway, P.N. Ostroumov, A.S. Plastun
    ANL, Argonne, USA
  • Y.S. Derbenev, F. Lin, V.S. Morozov, Y. Zhang
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
 
  Funding: This work was supported by the U.S. DOE, Office of Nuclear Physics, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357 for ANL and by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under U.S. DOE Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177.
The current baseline design for the JLab EIC (JLEIC) ion accelerator complex is based on a pulsed superconducting linac, an 8-GeV booster followed by a dual function 20-100 GeV booster and collider ring. Both the 8-GeV booster and collider ring will use super-ferric magnets with fields up to 3 Tesla. We here propose an alternative cost-effective and low-risk design where the 8-GeV booster is replaced with a more compact 3-GeV booster using room-temperature magnets. The electron storage ring, which is part of the electron complex, will also serve as large booster for the ions, up to 11 GeV. We also propose two stages for the JLEIC. A first low-energy stage up to 60 GeV, where room-temperature magnets (up to 1.6 Tesla) will be used for the ion collider ring, to be later replaced with 6 Tesla superconducting magnets in a second stage of the project providing up to 200 GeV energy. In this second stage, the 1.6 T room-temperature magnets will replace the PEP-II magnets in the electron storage ring to boost the ions to higher energies (25 GeV or higher) for appropriate injection into the higher energy collider. Details and feasibility of the proposed plan will be presented and discussed.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-TUPOB05  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
WEA1CO03 Simulations of Booster Injection Efficiency for the APS-Upgrade ion, lattice, injection, simulation 647
 
  • J.R. Calvey, M. Borland, K.C. Harkay, R.R. Lindberg, C. Yao
    ANL, Argonne, Illinois, USA
 
  The APS-Upgrade will require the injector chain to provide high single bunch charge for swap-out injection. One possible limiting factor to achieving this is an observed reduction of injection efficiency into the booster synchrotron at high charge. We have simulated booster injection using the particle tracking code elegant, including a model for the booster impedance and beam loading in the RF cavities. The simulations point to two possible causes for reduced efficiency: energy oscillations leading to losses at high dispersion locations, and a vertical beam size blowup caused by ions in the particle accumulator ring. We also show that the efficiency is much higher in an alternate booster lattice with smaller vertical beta function and zero dispersion in the straight sections.  
slides icon Slides WEA1CO03 [0.682 MB]  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-WEA1CO03  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
WEPOA18 Experimental Studies of Beam Collimation System in the Fermilab Booster ion, collimation, proton, radiation 732
 
  • V.V. Kapin, S. Chaurize, N.V. Mokhov, W. Pellico, M. Slabaugh, T. Sullivan, R. Tesarek, A.K. Triplett
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
 
  A two-stage collimation (2SC) system was installed in Fermilab Booster around 2004 and consists of 2 primary collimators (PrC), one for each of the horizontal and vertical planes and 3 secondary collimators (SC) each capable of acting in both planes. Presently, only SC are used as the single-stage collimation (1SC). Part of the Fermilab Proton Improvement Plan (PIP) includes a task to test 2SC for Booster operations. In this paper we describe preparatory steps to fix SC motion issues and installation of a 380μm thick aluminum foil PrC and post-processing software for beam orbit and beam loss measurements. The initial experimental results for 2SC in the vertical plane are also presented. The tuning of 2SC system was performed using fast loss monitors allowing much higher time-resolution than existing BLMs. Analysis of losses and beam transmission efficiency allow for the comparison of 1SC and 2SC schemes.  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-WEPOA18  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
WEPOA20 Numerical Simulations of Collimation Efficiency for Beam Collimation System in the Fermilab Booster ion, proton, collimation, simulation 735
 
  • V.V. Kapin, V.A. Lebedev, N.V. Mokhov, S.I. Striganov, I.S. Tropin
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
 
  A two-stage beam collimation (2SC) system has been installed in the Fermilab Booster more than 10 years ago. It consists of two primary collimators (horizontal and vertical) and three 1.2m-long secondary collimators. The two-stage collimation has never been used in Booster operations due to uncontrolled beam orbit variations produced by radial cogging (it is required for beam accumulation in Recycler). Instead, only secondary collimators were used in the single-stage collimation (1SC). Recently introduced magnetic cogging resulted in orbit stabilization in the course of almost entire accelerating cycle and created a possibility for the 2SC. In this paper, the 2SC performance is evaluated and compared the 1SC. Several parameters characterizing collimation efficiency are calculated in order to compare both schemes. A combination of the MADX and MARS15 codes is used for proton tracking in the Booster with their scattering in collimators being accounted. The dependence of efficiency on the primary collimators foil thickness is presented. The efficiency dependence on the proton energy is also obtained for the optimal foil. The feasibility of the 2SC scheme for the Booster is discussed.  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-WEPOA20  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
WEPOB39 Photo-Injector Optimization and Validation Study with the OPAL Beam Simulation Code ion, emittance, simulation, FEL 984
 
  • L.D. Duffy, K. Bishofberger, J.W. Lewellen, S.J. Russell, D.Y. Shchegolkov
    LANL, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
 
  A 42 keV x-ray free electron laser (XFEL) is a plausible technology alternative for the Matter Radiation Interactions in Extremes (MaRIE) experimental project, a concept developed by Los Alamos National Laboratory. An early pre-conceptual design for such an XFEL calls for 100 pC electron bunches with very low emittance and energy spread. High fidelity simulations that capture all beamline physics will be required to ensure a successful design. We expect to use the beam simulation code OPAL as one of the tools in this process. In this study, we validate OPAL as a photo-injector design tool by comparing its performance with published PITZ experimental data and simulations.  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-WEPOB39  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
WEPOB56 Beam Optics for the RHIC Low Energy Electron Cooler (LEReC) ion, electron, emittance, space-charge 1015
 
  • J. Kewisch, A.V. Fedotov, D. Kayran, S. Seletskiy
    BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
A Low-energy RHIC Electron Cooler (LEReC) system is presently under construction at Brookhaven National Laboratory. This device shall enable gold ion collisions at energies below the design injection energy with sufficient luminosity. Electron beam with energies between 1.6, 2.0 and 2.6 MeV are necessary. This machine will be the first to attempt electron cooling using bunched electron beam, using a 703 MHz SRF cavity for acceleration. Special consideration must be given to the effect of space charge forces on the transverse and longitudinal beam quality. We will present the current layout of the cooler and beam parameter simulations using the computer codes PARMELA.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-WEPOB56  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
WEPOB69 Impedance Simulation for LEReC Booster Cavity Transformed from ERL Gun Cavity ion, impedance, cavity, simulation 1048
 
  • C. Liu
    BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
Wake impedance induced energy spread is a concern for the electron beam to be used for electron cooling of the low energy ion beams in RHIC. The impedance simulation of the booster cavity for the Low Energy RHIC electron cooling (LEReC) project is presented in this report. The simulation is done for both non-relativistic and ultra-relativistic cases. The space charge impedance in the first case is discussed. For an impedance budget consideration of the electron machine only a simulation of the geometrical impedance in the latter case is necessary since space charge is considered separately.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-WEPOB69  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
THPOA19 Design Considerations for Proposed Fermilab Integrable RCS ion, lattice, optics, proton 1138
 
  • J.S. Eldred, A. Valishev
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
 
  Integrable optics is an innovation in particle accelerator design that provides strong nonlinear focusing while avoiding parametric resonances. One promising application of integrable optics is to overcome the traditional limits on accelerator intensity imposed by betatron tune-spread and collective instabilities. The efficacy of high-intensity integrable accelerators will be undergo comprehensive testing over the next several years at the Fermilab Integrable Optics Test Accelerator (IOTA) and the University of Maryland Electron Ring (UMER). We propose an integrable RCS (iRCS) as a replacement for the Fermilab Booster to achieve multi-MW beam power for the Fermilab high-energy neutrino program. We provide a overview of the machine parameters and discuss an approach to lattice optimization. Integrable optics requires arcs with integer-pi phase advance followed by drifts with matched beta functions. We provide an example integrable lattice with features of a modern RCS - long dispersion-free drifts, low momentum compaction, superperiodicity, chromaticity correction, separate-function magnets, and bounded beta functions.  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-THPOA19  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
THPOA29 PIP-II Transfer Lines Design ion, linac, dipole, optics 1161
 
  • A. Vivoli
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
 
  The U.S. Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel (P5) report encouraged the realization of Fermilab's Proton Improvement Plan II (PIP-II) to support future neutrino programs in the United States. PIP-II aims at enhancing the capabilities of the Fermilab existing accelerator complex while simultaneously providing a flexible platform for its future upgrades. The central part of PIP-II project is the construction of a new 800 MeV H Superconducting (SC) Linac together with upgrades of the Booster and Main Injector synchrotrons. New transfer lines will also be needed to deliver beam to the downstream accelerators and facilities. In this paper we present the recent development of the design of the transfer lines discussing the principles that guided their design, the constraints and requirements imposed by the existing accelerator complex and the following modifications implemented to comply with a better understanding of the limitations and further requirements that emerged during the development of the project.  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-THPOA29  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
THA3IO01 FNAL Accelerator Complex Upgrade Possibilities ion, proton, linac, cavity 1248
 
  • I. Kourbanis
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
 
  Proton Improvement Plan-II (PIP-II) is the centerpiece of Fermilab's plan for upgrading the accelerator complex to establish the leading facility in the world for particle physics research based on intense proton beams. PIP-II has been developed to provide 1.2 MW of proton beam power at the start of operations of the Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment (LBNE), while simultaneously providing a platform for eventual extension of LBNE beam power to >2 MW and enabling future initiatives in rare processes research based on high duty factor/higher beam power operations. PIP-II is based on the construction of a new 800 MeV superconducting linac, augmented by improvements to the existing Booster, Recycler, and Main Injector complex. PIP-II is currently in the development stage with an R&D program underway targeting the front end and superconducting RF acceleration technologies. This paper will describe the status of the PIP-II conceptual development, the associated technology R&D programs, and the strategy for project implementation.  
slides icon Slides THA3IO01 [10.115 MB]  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2016-THA3IO01  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)