NAPAC2019 - List of Keywords (luminosity)

Paper	Title	Other Keywords	Page
MOOHC2	The US Electron Ion Collider Accelerator Designs	electron, collider, polarization, proton	1
	A. Seryi, S.V. Benson, S.A. Bogacz, P.D. Brindza, M.W. Bruker, A. Camsonne, E. Daly, P. Degtiarenko, Y.S. Derbenev, M. Diefenthaler, J. Dolbeck, R. Ent, R. Fair, D. Fazenbaker, Y. Furletova, B.R. Gamage, D. Gaskell, R.L. Geng, P. Ghoshal, J.M. Grames, J. Guo, F.E. Hannon, L. Harwood, S. Henderson, H. Huang, A. Hutton, K. Jordan, D.H. Kashy, A.J. Kimber, G.A. Krafft, R. Lassiter, R. Li, F. Lin, M.A. Mamun, F. Marhauser, R. McKeown, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, P. Nadel-Turonski, E.A. Nissen, G.-T. Park, H. Park, M. Poelker, T. Powers, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, R.A. Rimmer, Y. Roblin, D. Romanov, P. Rossi, T. Satogata, M.F. Spata, R. Suleiman, A.V. Sy, C. Tennant, H. Wang, S. Wang, C. Weiss, M. Wiseman, W. Wittmer, R. Yoshida, H. Zhang, S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z.W. Zhao JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA D.T. Abell, D.L. Bruhwiler, I.V. Pogorelov RadiaSoft LLC, Boulder, Colorado, USA E.C. Aschenauer, G. Bassi, J. Beebe-Wang, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Blednykh, J.M. Brennan, S.J. Brooks, K.A. Brown, K.A. Drees, A.V. Fedotov, W. Fischer, D.M. Gassner, W. Guo, Y. Hao, A. Hershcovitch, H. Huang, W.A. Jackson, J. Kewisch, A. Kiselev, V. Litvinenko, C. Liu, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, F. Méot, M.G. Minty, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, S. Peggs, V. Ptitsyn, V.H. Ranjbar, G. Robert-Demolaize, T. Roser, S. Seletskiy, V.V. Smaluk, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, P. Thieberger, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, E. Wang, W.-T. Weng, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu, W. Xu, A. Zaltsman, W. Zhang BNL, Upton, New York, USA D.P. Barber DESY, Hamburg, Germany I.V. Bazarov Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA G.I. Bell, J.R. Cary Tech-X, Boulder, Colorado, USA Y. Cai, Y.M. Nosochkov, A. Novokhatski, G. Stupakov, M.K. Sullivan, C.-Y. Tsai SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA Z.A. Conway, M.P. Kelly, B. Mustapha, U. Wienands, A. Zholents ANL, Lemont, Illinois, USA S.U. De Silva, J.R. Delayen, H. Huang, C. Hyde, S. Sosa, B. Terzić ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA K.E. Deitrick, G.H. Hoffstaetter Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA D. Douglas Douglas Consulting, York, Virginia, USA V.G. Dudnikov, R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc, Illinois, USA B. Erdelyi, P. Piot Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA J.D. Fox Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA J. Gerity, T.L. Mann, P.M. McIntyre, N. Pogue, A. Sattarov Texas A&M University, College Station, USA E. Gianfelice-Wendt, S. Nagaitsev Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA Y. Hao, P.N. Ostroumov, A.S. Plastun, R.C. York FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA T. Mastoridis CalPoly, San Luis Obispo, California, USA J.D. Maxwell, R. Milner, M. Musgrave MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA J. Qiang, G.L. Sabbi LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA D. Teytelman Dimtel, Redwood City, California, USA R.C. York NSCL, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
	With the completion of the National Academies of Sciences Assessment of a US Electron-Ion Collider, the prospects for construction of such a facility have taken a step forward. This paper provides an overview of the two site-specific EIC designs: JLEIC (Jefferson Lab) and eRHIC (BNL) as well as brief overview of ongoing EIC R&D.
	Slides MOOHC2 [14.774 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOOHC2
About •	paper received ※ 29 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 04 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

MOYBA1	LHC Status and Plans	operation, electron, experiment, proton	8
	X. Buffat CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
	Performance and accelerator physics challenges from LHC Run 2 are reviewed, along with the ongoing preparation and plans for LHC Runs 3 and 4.
	Slides MOYBA1 [13.269 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOYBA1
About •	paper received ※ 26 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 02 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

MOYBA2	Commissioning of the Phase 2 and Phase 3 SuperKEKB / B-Factory	detector, MMI, optics, injection	14
	S. Nakamura KEK, Ibaraki, Japan
	The next generation of B-Factory, the SuperKEKB electron-positron collider at KEK (Japan) has started after two years shutdown from the Phase 1 commissioning in 2016. The first phase for the vacuum scrubbing in 2016 and the second phase focused on the verification of the novel "nano-beam" collision scheme were successfully completed in 2018. The modifications between Phase 1 and Phase 2 follows Phase 3 are installations of the final focus system and the Belle II detector. In order to accomplish the higher luminosity more than the predecessor KEKB , the nano-beam scheme is studied with higher bunch currents to reduce the beam-beam blowup which degrade the luminosity. The new collision scheme is reviewed and the luminosity performance and overall status in the Phase 2 and Phase 3 commissioning are presented.
	Slides MOYBA2 [13.453 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOYBA2
About •	paper received ※ 30 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 01 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

MOYBA4	eRHIC Design Update	electron, hadron, interaction-region, proton	18
	C. Montag, G. Bassi, J. Beebe-Wang, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Blednykh, J.M. Brennan, S.J. Brooks, K.A. Brown, K.A. Drees, A.V. Fedotov, W. Fischer, D.M. Gassner, Y. Hao, A. Hershcovitch, C. Hetzel, D. Holmes, H. Huang, W.A. Jackson, J. Kewisch, Y. Li, C. Liu, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, F. Méot, M.G. Minty, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, S. Peggs, V. Ptitsyn, V.H. Ranjbar, G. Robert-Demolaize, S. Seletskiy, V.V. Smaluk, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, P. Thieberger, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S. Verdú-Andrés, W.-T. Weng, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu, W. Xu, A. Zaltsman, W. Zhang BNL, Upton, New York, USA Y. Cai, Y.M. Nosochkov SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA E. Gianfelice-Wendt Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
	Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The future electron-ion collider (EIC) aims at an electron-proton luminosity of 10³³ to 10³⁴ cm^-2 sec^-1 and a center-of-mass energy range from 20 to 140 GeV. The eRHIC design has been continuously evolving over a couple of years and has reached a considerable level of maturity. The concept is generally conservative with very few risk items which are mitigated in various ways.
	Slides MOYBA4 [5.466 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOYBA4
About •	paper received ※ 24 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 31 August 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

MOYBA5	Weak-Strong Simulation of Beam-Beam Effects in Super Proton-Proton Collider	proton, simulation, collider, resonance	22
	L.J. Wang, J.Y. Tang IHEP, Beijing, People’s Republic of China T. Sen Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
	A Super Proton-Proton Collider (SPPC) that aims to explore new physics beyond the standard model is planned in China. Here we focus on the impact of beam-beam interactions in the SPPC. Simulations show that with the current optics and nominal tunes, the dynamic aperture (DA) with all the beam-beam interactions is less than 6σ, the dominant cause being the long-range interactions. First, we show the results of a tune scan done to maximize the DA. Next, we discuss the compensation of the long-range interactions by increasing the crossing angle and also by using current carrying wires.
	Slides MOYBA5 [1.004 MB]
	Poster MOYBA5 [0.727 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOYBA5
About •	paper received ※ 25 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 20 November 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

MOYBA6	Accelerator Performance During the Beam Energy Scan II at RHIC in 2019	electron, operation, cavity, MMI	26
	C. Liu, I. Blacker, M. Blaskiewicz, K.A. Brown, D. Bruno, K.A. Drees, A.V. Fedotov, W. Fischer, C.J. Gardner, C.E. Giorgio, X. Gu, T. Hayes, H. Huang, R.L. Hulsart, D. Kayran, N.A. Kling, Y. Luo, D. Maffei, G.J. Marr, B. Martin, A. Marusic, K. Mernick, R.J. Michnoff, M.G. Minty, C. Montag, J. Morris, C. Naylor, S. Nemesure, I. Pinayev, S. Polizzo, V.H. Ranjbar, D. Raparia, G. Robert-Demolaize, T. Roser, J. Sandberg, V. Schoefer, F. Severino, T.C. Shrey, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, P. Thieberger, A. Zaltsman, K. Zeno, I.Y. Zhang, W. Zhang BNL, Upton, New York, USA
	Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy. RHIC provided Au-Au collisions at beam energies of 9.8, 7.3, 4.59 and 3.85 GeV/nucleon during the first year of the Beam Energy Scan II in 2019. The physics goals at the first two higher beam energies were achieved. At the two lower beam energies, bunched electron beam cooling has been demonstrated successfully. The accelerator performance was improved compared to when RHIC was operated at these energies in earlier years. This article will introduce the challenges to operate RHIC at low energies and the corresponding countermeasures, and review the improvement of accelerator performance during the operation in 2019.
	Slides MOYBA6 [6.579 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOYBA6
About •	paper received ※ 21 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 06 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPLO06	Weak-Strong Beam-Beam Simulation for eRHIC	proton, cavity, simulation, electron	545
	Y. Luo, G. Bassi, M. Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, C. Montag, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke BNL, Upton, New York, USA Y. Hao, D. Xu FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA J. Qiang LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
	Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy. In the eRHIC, to compensate the geometric luminosity loss due to the crossing angle, crab cavities are to be installed on both sides of the interaction point. When the proton bunch length is comparable to the wavelength of its crab cavities, protons will not be perfectly tilted in the x-z plane. In the article, we employ weak-strong beam-beam interaction model to calculate the proton beam size growth rates and luminosity degradation rate with various machine and time parameters. The goal of these studies is to optimize the the beam-beam related machine and beam parameters of eRHIC.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-TUPLO06
About •	paper received ※ 29 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 03 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPLO07	Calculation of Action Diffusion With Crabbed Collision in eRHIC	proton, cavity, electron, simulation	549
	Y. Luo, G. Bassi, M. Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, C. Montag, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke BNL, Upton, New York, USA Y. Hao, D. Xu FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA J. Qiang LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
	Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy. In the eRHIC, to compensate the geometric luminosity loss due to the crossing angle, crab cavities are to be installed on both sides of the interaction point. When the proton bunch length is comparable to the wavelength of its crab cavities, protons will not be perfectly tilted in the x-z plane. In the article, we develop a simulation code to calculate the transverse action diffusion rate as function of the initial proton longitudinal action. The goal of this study is to identify the contributions from various protons to the overall emittance growth. Tune scan is also performed to locate optimum working points which yield less proton emittance growth.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-TUPLO07
About •	paper received ※ 29 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 03 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPLO09	Electron-Ion Collider Performance Studies With Beam Synchronization via Gear-Change	electron, collider, simulation, beam-beam-effects	553
	I. Neththikumara, G.A. Krafft, B. Terzić ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA G.A. Krafft, Y. Roblin JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
	Beam synchronization of the future electron-ion collider (EIC) is studied with introducing different bunch numbers in the two colliding beams. This allows non-pairwise collisions between the bunches of the two beams and is known as "gear-change", whereby one bunch of the first beam collides with all other bunches of the second beam, one at a time. Here we report on the study of how the beam dynamics of the Jefferson Lab Electron Ion collider concept is affected by the gear change. For this study, we use the new GPU-based code (GHOST). It features symplectic one-turn maps for particle tracking and Bassetti-Erskine approach for beam-beam interactions.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-TUPLO09
About •	paper received ※ 28 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 05 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

WEYBA3	Tolerances for Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Drivers	plasma, FEL, emittance, acceleration	614
	G.R. White, T.O. Raubenheimer SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
	Transverse jitter tolerances are considered for beam-driven plasma accelerators. A simple model for jitter transfer from the drive to witness beam was developed and con-crete examples were studied for: high-brightness witness bunch injectors; high-energy boosters for FEL’s; and future Linear Colliders. For the LC application, we con-sider a superconducting Linac designed to minimize the jitter conditions of the drive beam. We use a start-to-end tracking model to simulate expected jitter performance. The tolerances on each subsystem of the driver Linac are found to be very tight, especially for magnet vibration which must be controlled at the sub-nm level. Work supported by the Department of Energy under Contract Number: DE-AC02-76SF00515.
	Slides WEYBA3 [6.178 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-WEYBA3
About •	paper received ※ 27 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 02 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THAHC2	The Future Circular Collider and Physical Review Accelerators & Beams	collider, hadron, lepton, operation	975
	F. Zimmermann CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
	The proposed integrated program of the Future Circular Collider(FCC) takes a huge step beyond LEP and LHC. The FCC consists, in a first stage, of an energy- and luminosity-frontier electron-positron collider, which will operate at center-of-mass (c.m.) energies from about 90 to 365 GeV, and serve as electroweak factory. The second stage of the FCC will be a 100 TeV proton collider based on novel high-field magnets. A similar project is being proposed in China. In parallel to the development of future colliders, also the field of publications is undergoing profound changes. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams (PRAB) was founded in 1997 as a pioneering all-electronic diamond open-access journal, far ahead of its time. For many years PRAB was the fastest growing journal in the Physical Review family. Authors, editors and referees are highly internationalized. In this paper, on the occasion of the acceptance of the 2019 USPAS Prize for Achievement in Accelerator Science and Technology, I sketch the history, status, and challenges of FCC and PRAB.
	Slides THAHC2 [10.458 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-THAHC2
About •	paper received ※ 27 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 15 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

Paper

Title

Other Keywords

Page

MOOHC2

The US Electron Ion Collider Accelerator Designs

electron, collider, polarization, proton

1

A. Seryi, S.V. Benson, S.A. Bogacz, P.D. Brindza, M.W. Bruker, A. Camsonne, E. Daly, P. Degtiarenko, Y.S. Derbenev, M. Diefenthaler, J. Dolbeck, R. Ent, R. Fair, D. Fazenbaker, Y. Furletova, B.R. Gamage, D. Gaskell, R.L. Geng, P. Ghoshal, J.M. Grames, J. Guo, F.E. Hannon, L. Harwood, S. Henderson, H. Huang, A. Hutton, K. Jordan, D.H. Kashy, A.J. Kimber, G.A. Krafft, R. Lassiter, R. Li, F. Lin, M.A. Mamun, F. Marhauser, R. McKeown, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, P. Nadel-Turonski, E.A. Nissen, G.-T. Park, H. Park, M. Poelker, T. Powers, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, R.A. Rimmer, Y. Roblin, D. Romanov, P. Rossi, T. Satogata, M.F. Spata, R. Suleiman, A.V. Sy, C. Tennant, H. Wang, S. Wang, C. Weiss, M. Wiseman, W. Wittmer, R. Yoshida, H. Zhang, S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z.W. Zhao
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
D.T. Abell, D.L. Bruhwiler, I.V. Pogorelov
RadiaSoft LLC, Boulder, Colorado, USA
E.C. Aschenauer, G. Bassi, J. Beebe-Wang, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Blednykh, J.M. Brennan, S.J. Brooks, K.A. Brown, K.A. Drees, A.V. Fedotov, W. Fischer, D.M. Gassner, W. Guo, Y. Hao, A. Hershcovitch, H. Huang, W.A. Jackson, J. Kewisch, A. Kiselev, V. Litvinenko, C. Liu, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, F. Méot, M.G. Minty, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, S. Peggs, V. Ptitsyn, V.H. Ranjbar, G. Robert-Demolaize, T. Roser, S. Seletskiy, V.V. Smaluk, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, P. Thieberger, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, E. Wang, W.-T. Weng, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu, W. Xu, A. Zaltsman, W. Zhang
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
D.P. Barber
DESY, Hamburg, Germany
I.V. Bazarov
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
G.I. Bell, J.R. Cary
Tech-X, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Y. Cai, Y.M. Nosochkov, A. Novokhatski, G. Stupakov, M.K. Sullivan, C.-Y. Tsai
SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
Z.A. Conway, M.P. Kelly, B. Mustapha, U. Wienands, A. Zholents
ANL, Lemont, Illinois, USA
S.U. De Silva, J.R. Delayen, H. Huang, C. Hyde, S. Sosa, B. Terzić
ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
K.E. Deitrick, G.H. Hoffstaetter
Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA
D. Douglas
Douglas Consulting, York, Virginia, USA
V.G. Dudnikov, R.P. Johnson
Muons, Inc, Illinois, USA
B. Erdelyi, P. Piot
Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
J.D. Fox
Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
J. Gerity, T.L. Mann, P.M. McIntyre, N. Pogue, A. Sattarov
Texas A&M University, College Station, USA
E. Gianfelice-Wendt, S. Nagaitsev
Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
Y. Hao, P.N. Ostroumov, A.S. Plastun, R.C. York
FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
T. Mastoridis
CalPoly, San Luis Obispo, California, USA
J.D. Maxwell, R. Milner, M. Musgrave
MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
J. Qiang, G.L. Sabbi
LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
D. Teytelman
Dimtel, Redwood City, California, USA
R.C. York
NSCL, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

With the completion of the National Academies of Sciences Assessment of a US Electron-Ion Collider, the prospects for construction of such a facility have taken a step forward. This paper provides an overview of the two site-specific EIC designs: JLEIC (Jefferson Lab) and eRHIC (BNL) as well as brief overview of ongoing EIC R&D.

Slides MOOHC2 [14.774 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOOHC2

About •

paper received ※ 29 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 04 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

MOYBA1

LHC Status and Plans

operation, electron, experiment, proton

8

X. Buffat
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

Performance and accelerator physics challenges from LHC Run 2 are reviewed, along with the ongoing preparation and plans for LHC Runs 3 and 4.

Slides MOYBA1 [13.269 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOYBA1

About •

paper received ※ 26 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 02 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

MOYBA2

Commissioning of the Phase 2 and Phase 3 SuperKEKB / B-Factory

detector, MMI, optics, injection

14

S. Nakamura
KEK, Ibaraki, Japan

The next generation of B-Factory, the SuperKEKB electron-positron collider at KEK (Japan) has started after two years shutdown from the Phase 1 commissioning in 2016. The first phase for the vacuum scrubbing in 2016 and the second phase focused on the verification of the novel "nano-beam" collision scheme were successfully completed in 2018. The modifications between Phase 1 and Phase 2 follows Phase 3 are installations of the final focus system and the Belle II detector. In order to accomplish the higher luminosity more than the predecessor KEKB , the nano-beam scheme is studied with higher bunch currents to reduce the beam-beam blowup which degrade the luminosity. The new collision scheme is reviewed and the luminosity performance and overall status in the Phase 2 and Phase 3 commissioning are presented.

Slides MOYBA2 [13.453 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOYBA2

About •

paper received ※ 30 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 01 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

MOYBA4

eRHIC Design Update

electron, hadron, interaction-region, proton

18

C. Montag, G. Bassi, J. Beebe-Wang, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Blednykh, J.M. Brennan, S.J. Brooks, K.A. Brown, K.A. Drees, A.V. Fedotov, W. Fischer, D.M. Gassner, Y. Hao, A. Hershcovitch, C. Hetzel, D. Holmes, H. Huang, W.A. Jackson, J. Kewisch, Y. Li, C. Liu, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, F. Méot, M.G. Minty, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, S. Peggs, V. Ptitsyn, V.H. Ranjbar, G. Robert-Demolaize, S. Seletskiy, V.V. Smaluk, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, P. Thieberger, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S. Verdú-Andrés, W.-T. Weng, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu, W. Xu, A. Zaltsman, W. Zhang
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
Y. Cai, Y.M. Nosochkov
SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
E. Gianfelice-Wendt
Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA

Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
The future electron-ion collider (EIC) aims at an electron-proton luminosity of 10³³ to 10³⁴ cm^-2 sec^-1 and a center-of-mass energy range from 20 to 140 GeV. The eRHIC design has been continuously evolving over a couple of years and has reached a considerable level of maturity. The concept is generally conservative with very few risk items which are mitigated in various ways.

Slides MOYBA4 [5.466 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOYBA4

About •

paper received ※ 24 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 31 August 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

MOYBA5

Weak-Strong Simulation of Beam-Beam Effects in Super Proton-Proton Collider

proton, simulation, collider, resonance

22

L.J. Wang, J.Y. Tang
IHEP, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
T. Sen
Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA

A Super Proton-Proton Collider (SPPC) that aims to explore new physics beyond the standard model is planned in China. Here we focus on the impact of beam-beam interactions in the SPPC. Simulations show that with the current optics and nominal tunes, the dynamic aperture (DA) with all the beam-beam interactions is less than 6σ, the dominant cause being the long-range interactions. First, we show the results of a tune scan done to maximize the DA. Next, we discuss the compensation of the long-range interactions by increasing the crossing angle and also by using current carrying wires.

Slides MOYBA5 [1.004 MB]

Poster MOYBA5 [0.727 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOYBA5

About •

paper received ※ 25 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 20 November 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

MOYBA6

Accelerator Performance During the Beam Energy Scan II at RHIC in 2019

electron, operation, cavity, MMI

26

C. Liu, I. Blacker, M. Blaskiewicz, K.A. Brown, D. Bruno, K.A. Drees, A.V. Fedotov, W. Fischer, C.J. Gardner, C.E. Giorgio, X. Gu, T. Hayes, H. Huang, R.L. Hulsart, D. Kayran, N.A. Kling, Y. Luo, D. Maffei, G.J. Marr, B. Martin, A. Marusic, K. Mernick, R.J. Michnoff, M.G. Minty, C. Montag, J. Morris, C. Naylor, S. Nemesure, I. Pinayev, S. Polizzo, V.H. Ranjbar, D. Raparia, G. Robert-Demolaize, T. Roser, J. Sandberg, V. Schoefer, F. Severino, T.C. Shrey, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, P. Thieberger, A. Zaltsman, K. Zeno, I.Y. Zhang, W. Zhang
BNL, Upton, New York, USA

Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
RHIC provided Au-Au collisions at beam energies of 9.8, 7.3, 4.59 and 3.85 GeV/nucleon during the first year of the Beam Energy Scan II in 2019. The physics goals at the first two higher beam energies were achieved. At the two lower beam energies, bunched electron beam cooling has been demonstrated successfully. The accelerator performance was improved compared to when RHIC was operated at these energies in earlier years. This article will introduce the challenges to operate RHIC at low energies and the corresponding countermeasures, and review the improvement of accelerator performance during the operation in 2019.

Slides MOYBA6 [6.579 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOYBA6

About •

paper received ※ 21 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 06 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPLO06

Weak-Strong Beam-Beam Simulation for eRHIC

proton, cavity, simulation, electron

545

Y. Luo, G. Bassi, M. Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, C. Montag, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
Y. Hao, D. Xu
FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
J. Qiang
LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA

Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
In the eRHIC, to compensate the geometric luminosity loss due to the crossing angle, crab cavities are to be installed on both sides of the interaction point. When the proton bunch length is comparable to the wavelength of its crab cavities, protons will not be perfectly tilted in the x-z plane. In the article, we employ weak-strong beam-beam interaction model to calculate the proton beam size growth rates and luminosity degradation rate with various machine and time parameters. The goal of these studies is to optimize the the beam-beam related machine and beam parameters of eRHIC.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-TUPLO06

About •

paper received ※ 29 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 03 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPLO07

Calculation of Action Diffusion With Crabbed Collision in eRHIC

proton, cavity, electron, simulation

549

Y. Luo, G. Bassi, M. Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, C. Montag, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
Y. Hao, D. Xu
FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
J. Qiang
LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA

Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
In the eRHIC, to compensate the geometric luminosity loss due to the crossing angle, crab cavities are to be installed on both sides of the interaction point. When the proton bunch length is comparable to the wavelength of its crab cavities, protons will not be perfectly tilted in the x-z plane. In the article, we develop a simulation code to calculate the transverse action diffusion rate as function of the initial proton longitudinal action. The goal of this study is to identify the contributions from various protons to the overall emittance growth. Tune scan is also performed to locate optimum working points which yield less proton emittance growth.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-TUPLO07

About •

paper received ※ 29 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 03 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPLO09

Electron-Ion Collider Performance Studies With Beam Synchronization via Gear-Change

electron, collider, simulation, beam-beam-effects

553

I. Neththikumara, G.A. Krafft, B. Terzić
ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
G.A. Krafft, Y. Roblin
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA

Beam synchronization of the future electron-ion collider (EIC) is studied with introducing different bunch numbers in the two colliding beams. This allows non-pairwise collisions between the bunches of the two beams and is known as "gear-change", whereby one bunch of the first beam collides with all other bunches of the second beam, one at a time. Here we report on the study of how the beam dynamics of the Jefferson Lab Electron Ion collider concept is affected by the gear change. For this study, we use the new GPU-based code (GHOST). It features symplectic one-turn maps for particle tracking and Bassetti-Erskine approach for beam-beam interactions.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-TUPLO09

About •

paper received ※ 28 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 05 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

WEYBA3

Tolerances for Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Drivers

plasma, FEL, emittance, acceleration

614

G.R. White, T.O. Raubenheimer
SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA

Transverse jitter tolerances are considered for beam-driven plasma accelerators. A simple model for jitter transfer from the drive to witness beam was developed and con-crete examples were studied for: high-brightness witness bunch injectors; high-energy boosters for FEL’s; and future Linear Colliders. For the LC application, we con-sider a superconducting Linac designed to minimize the jitter conditions of the drive beam. We use a start-to-end tracking model to simulate expected jitter performance. The tolerances on each subsystem of the driver Linac are found to be very tight, especially for magnet vibration which must be controlled at the sub-nm level.
Work supported by the Department of Energy under Contract Number: DE-AC02-76SF00515.

Slides WEYBA3 [6.178 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-WEYBA3

About •

paper received ※ 27 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 02 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THAHC2

The Future Circular Collider and Physical Review Accelerators & Beams

collider, hadron, lepton, operation

975

F. Zimmermann
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

The proposed integrated program of the Future Circular Collider(FCC) takes a huge step beyond LEP and LHC. The FCC consists, in a first stage, of an energy- and luminosity-frontier electron-positron collider, which will operate at center-of-mass (c.m.) energies from about 90 to 365 GeV, and serve as electroweak factory. The second stage of the FCC will be a 100 TeV proton collider based on novel high-field magnets. A similar project is being proposed in China. In parallel to the development of future colliders, also the field of publications is undergoing profound changes. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams (PRAB) was founded in 1997 as a pioneering all-electronic diamond open-access journal, far ahead of its time. For many years PRAB was the fastest growing journal in the Physical Review family. Authors, editors and referees are highly internationalized. In this paper, on the occasion of the acceptance of the 2019 USPAS Prize for Achievement in Accelerator Science and Technology, I sketch the history, status, and challenges of FCC and PRAB.

Slides THAHC2 [10.458 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-THAHC2

About •

paper received ※ 27 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 15 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)