Keyword: project-management
Paper Title Other Keywords Page
MOPIK126 Establishing a Project Management Office for the Large Scale Multi Project FAIR site, controls, interface, operation 835
 
  • F. Becker, S. Deveaux, A. Fröhlich, G. Hickler, M. Lautenschläger, M. Raponi, B. Schoenfelder, M. Strangmann, N. Winters
    GSI, Darmstadt, Germany
  • J.R. Regler, D. Urner
    FAIR, Darmstadt, Germany
  
  The Fa­cil­ity for An­tipro­ton and Ion Re­search (FAIR) is a large scale multi pro­ject com­pris­ing 10 sub­pro­jects in the field of ac­cel­er­a­tors (pLINAC, SIS100, Su­per­FRS, p-bar Sep­a­ra­tor, Col­lec­tor Ring, High En­ergy Stor­age Ring), ex­per­i­ments (CBM, APPA, NUS­TAR, PANDA) and civil con­struc­tion. This con­tri­bu­tion de­scribes an in­te­grated ap­proach how a con­trol­ling type pro­ject man­age­ment of­fice (PMO) was es­tab­lished, meet­ing the over­all re­quire­ments for pro­ject steer­ing and spe­cific re­quire­ments of the sub­pro­jects and in­ter­na­tional part­ners in­volved. Major re­spon­si­bil­i­ties of the PMO are pro­ject plan­ning, in­te­grated re­port­ing, cost and bud­get con­trol, risk man­age­ment, in-kind co­or­di­na­tion & pro­cure­ment, qual­ity as­sur­ance & con­fig­u­ra­tion man­age­ment. Core processes, roles and re­spon­si­bil­i­ties, method­ol­ogy and in­ter­faces in­ter­nally and to­wards the pro­ject pil­lars are pre­sented.  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2017-MOPIK126  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
MOPIK127 FAIR Risk Management as a Proactive Steering Tool for the Large Scale Multi Project factory, experiment, antiproton, ion 839
 
  • S. Deveaux, F. Becker
    GSI, Darmstadt, Germany
  
  The Fa­cil­ity for An­tipro­ton and Ion Re­search (FAIR) is a large scale multi pro­ject com­pris­ing 10 sub­pro­jects in the field of ac­cel­er­a­tors (pLINAC, SIS100, Su­per­FRS, p-bar sep­a­ra­tor, Col­lec­tor Ring, High En­ergy Stor­age Ring), ex­per­i­ments (CBM, APPA, NUS­TAR, PANDA) and civil con­struc­tion. This con­tri­bu­tion de­scribes the im­ple­men­ta­tion of a pro­gres­sive risk man­age­ment method­ol­ogy based on a com­pre­hen­sive as­sess­ment on work pack­age level. Com­plex­ity fac­tors (num­ber of parts, level of state of the art, level of human in­ter­faces, level of op­er­a­tional com­plex­ity) and im­por­tance fac­tors (safety, cost, sched­ule, re­sources) rep­re­sent the like­li­hood of risk oc­cur­rence and the even­tual value at risk. Rel­a­tive com­par­i­son of the nor­mal­ized fac­tors to­gether with a sup­plier as­sess­ment en­ables to de­rive an event based risk reg­is­ter with a stan­dard­ized eval­u­a­tion scheme as­sign­ing risk and op­por­tu­nity classes. This con­tri­bu­tion demon­strates the full method­ol­ogy high­light­ing some typ­i­cal ex­am­ples of the FAIR pro­ject.  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2017-MOPIK127  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
MOPIK128 Integrated Project Planning as a Central Steering Tool for the Large Scale Multi Project FAIR experiment, status, site, controls 842
 
  • N. Winters, F. Becker, M.V. Ricciardi
    GSI, Darmstadt, Germany
  
  The Fa­cil­ity for An­tipro­ton and Ion Re­search (FAIR) is a large scale multi pro­ject com­pris­ing 10 sub­pro­jects in the field of ac­cel­er­a­tors (pLINAC, SIS100, Su­per­FRS, p-bar, CR, HESR), ex­per­i­ments (CBM, APPA, NUS­TAR, PANDA) and civil con­struc­tion. This con­tri­bu­tion de­scribes the fun­da­men­tal re­vamp of FAIR in­te­grated pro­ject plan­ning. Main ob­jec­tive is to pre­serve the ad­van­tages of a bot­tom-up plan­ning topol­ogy with the ac­tual and de­tailed level of in­for­ma­tion keep­ing the ~400 work pack­age leader's cen­tral role as plan own­ers in their field of re­spon­si­bil­ity. Si­mul­ta­ne­ously dif­fer­ent pro­ject phases (e.g. civil con­struc­tion, pro­cure­ment, in­stal­la­tion, com­mis­sion­ing) need to be ex­cluded from de­tailed plans while being re-in­te­grated in the level-1 pro­ject mas­ter sched­ule. Ad­di­tional cost pro­files and re­source as­sign­ment by name allow a progress track­ing and flex­i­ble pro­ject steer­ing.  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2017-MOPIK128  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
WEPAB018 Engineering Collaboration Experience at the European XFEL database, distributed, monitoring, controls 2604
 
  • L. Hagge, M. Hüning, J. Kreutzkamp
    DESY, Hamburg, Germany
  
  The con­struc­tion of the Eu­ro­pean XFEL in­volved a huge in­ter­na­tion­ally dis­trib­uted and in­ter-dis­ci­pli­nary en­gi­neer­ing ef­fort. This paper dis­cusses ex­am­ples for good en­gi­neer­ing prac­tices which have been suc­cess­fully de­vel­oped and ap­plied in the con­struc­tion of the Eu­ro­pean XFEL. It ad­dresses ap­pro­pri­ate com­bi­na­tion of de-/cen­tral ac­tiv­i­ties in de­sign col­lab­o­ra­tion and in­te­gra­tion; the use of man­u­fac­tur­ing bills of ma­te­ri­als for co­or­di­nat­ing and track­ing con­tri­bu­tions, as well as for clar­i­fy­ing re­spon­si­bil­i­ties; the right amount of re­views for keep­ing ac­tiv­i­ties in synch; some spe­cific needs of and mea­sures for in-kind col­lab­o­ra­tion; and gen­eral meth­ods, tools and prac­tices and spirit for ef­fi­cient com­mu­ni­ca­tion and col­lab­o­ra­tion.  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2017-WEPAB018  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)