IPAC2021 - List of Authors (Morozov, V.S.)

Paper	Title	Page
MOPAB216	20-24 GeV FFA CEBAF Energy Upgrade	715
	S.A. Bogacz, J.F. Benesch, R.M. Bodenstein, B.R. Gamage, G.A. Krafft, V.S. Morozov, Y. Roblin JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA J.S. Berg, S.J. Brooks, D. Trbojevic BNL, Upton, New York, USA D. Douglas Douglas Consulting, York, Virginia, USA G.H. Hoffstaetter Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA
	Funding: This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics under contract DE-AC05-06OR23177 A proposal was formulated to increase the CEBAF energy from the present 12 GeV to 20-24 GeV by replacing the highest-energy arcs with Fixed Field Alternating Gradient (FFA) arcs. The new pair of arcs would provide six or seven new beam passes, going through this magnet array, allowing the energy to be nearly doubled using the existing CEBAF SRF cavity system. One of the immediate accelerator design tasks is to develop a proof-of-principle FFA arc magnet lattice that would support simultaneous transport of 6-7 passes with energies spanning a factor of two. We also examine the possibility of using combined function magnets to configure a cascade, six-way beam split switchyard. Finally, a novel multi-pass linac optics based on a weakly focusing lattice is being explored.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-MOPAB216
About •	paper received ※ 19 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 02 June 2021 issue date ※ 29 August 2021
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

MOPAB240	Estimates of Damped Equilibrium Energy Spread and Emittance in a Dual Energy Storage Ring	774
	B. Dhital, G.A. Krafft ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA Y.S. Derbenev, D. Douglas, A. Hutton, G.A. Krafft, F. Lin, V.S. Morozov, Y. Zhang JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
	Funding: Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, and Office of Nuclear Physics under Contracts DE-AC05-06OR23177 and DE-AC02-06CH11357. / Jefferson Lab EIC Fellowship2020. A dual energy storage ring design consists of two loops at markedly different energies. As in a single-energy storage ring, the linear optics in the ring design may be used to determine the damped equilibrium emittance and energy spread. Because the individual radiation events in the two rings are different and independent, we can provide analytical estimates of the damping times in a dual energy storage ring. Using the damping times, the values of damped energy spread, and emittance can be determined for a range of parameters related to lattice design and rings energies. We present analytical calculations along with simulation results to estimate the values of damped energy spread and emittance in a dual energy storage ring. We note that the damping time tends to be dominated by the damping time of the high energy ring in cases where the energy of the high energy rings is significantly greater than that of the low energy ring.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-MOPAB240
About •	paper received ※ 17 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 27 May 2021 issue date ※ 13 August 2021
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUXA07	Beam Dynamics Study in a Dual Energy Storage Ring for Ion Beam Cooling*	1290
	B. Dhital, G.A. Krafft ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA Y.S. Derbenev, D. Douglas, A. Hutton, G.A. Krafft, F. Lin, V.S. Morozov, Y. Zhang JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
	Funding: * Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, and Office of Nuclear Physics under Contracts DE-AC05-06OR23177 and DE-AC02-06CH11357. / Jefferson Lab EIC Fellowship2020. A dual energy storage ring designed for beam cooling consists of two closed rings with significantly different energies: the cooling and damping rings. These two rings are connected by an energy recovering superconducting RF structure that provides the necessary energy difference. In our design, the RF acceleration has a main linac and harmonic cavities both running at crest that at first accelerates the beam from low energy E_L to high energy E_H and then decelerates the beam from E_H to E_L in the next pass. The purpose of the harmonic cavities is to extend the bunch length in a dual energy storage ring as such a longer bunch length may be very useful in a cooling application. Besides these cavities, a bunching cavity running on zero-crossing phase is used outside of the common beamline to provide the necessary longitudinal focusing for the system. In this paper, we present a preliminary lattice design along with the fundamental beam dynamics study in such a dual energy storage ring.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUXA07
About •	paper received ※ 19 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 07 June 2021 issue date ※ 28 August 2021
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPAB040	Design Concept for the Second Interaction Region for Electron-Ion Collider	1435
	B.R. Gamage, V. Burkert, R. Ent, Y. Furletova, D.W. Higinbotham, A. Hutton, F. Lin, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, D. Romanov, T. Satogata, A. Seryi, A.V. Sy, C. Weiss, M. Wiseman, W. Wittmer, Y. Zhang JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA E.C. Aschenauer, J.S. Berg, A. Jentsch, A. Kiselev, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte BNL, Upton, New York, USA C. Hyde ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA P. Nadel-Turonski SBU, Stony Brook, New York, USA
	Funding: Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177 and Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The possibility of two interaction regions (IRs) is a design requirement for Electron-Ion Collider (EIC). There is also a significant interest from the nuclear physics community to have a 2nd IR with measurement capabilities complementary to those of the 1st IR. While the 2nd IR will be in operation over the entire energy range of ~20GeV to ~140GeV center of mass (CM). The 2nd IR can also provide an acceptance coverage complementary to that of the 1st. In this paper, we present a brief overview and the current progress of the 2nd IR design in terms of the parameters, magnet layout, and beam dynamics.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUPAB040
About •	paper received ※ 24 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 31 August 2021 issue date ※ 30 August 2021
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPAB041	Detector Solenoid Compensation for the Electron-Ion Collider	1439
	B.R. Gamage, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, A. Seryi, W. Wittmer, Y. Zhang JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA E. Gianfelice-Wendt Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA A. Kiselev, H. Lovelace III, B. Parker, S. Peggs, S. Tepikian, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu BNL, Upton, New York, USA
	Funding: Jefferson Science Associates, LLC Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177, Fermi Research Alliance, LLC Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359, and Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC Contract No. DE-SC0012704 The central detector in the present EIC design includes a 4 m long solenoid with an integrated strength of up to 12 Tm. The electron beam passes on-axis through the solenoid, but the hadron beam has an angle of 25 mrad. Thus the solenoid couples horizontal and vertical betatron motion in both electron and hadron storage rings, and causes a vertical closed orbit excursion in the hadron ring. The solenoid also couples the transverse and longitudinal motions of both beams, when crab cavities are also considered. In this paper, we present schemes for closed orbit correction and coupling compensation at the IP, including crabbing.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUPAB041
About •	paper received ※ 28 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 31 August 2021 issue date ※ 12 August 2021
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

WEXA04	The RCS Design Status for the Electron Ion Collider	2521
	V.H. Ranjbar, M. Blaskiewicz, Z.A. Conway, D.M. Gassner, C. Hetzel, B. Lepore, H. Lovelace III, I. Marneris, F. Méot, C. Montag, J. Skaritka, N. Tsoupas, E. Wang, F.J. Willeke BNL, Upton, New York, USA J.M. Grames, J. Guo, F. Lin, V.S. Morozov, T. Satogata JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA D. Sagan Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA
	Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The design of the Electron-Ion Collider Rapid Cycling Synchrotron (RCS) to be constructed at Brookhaven National Laboratory is advancing to meet the injection requirements for the Electron Storage Ring (ESR). Over the past year activities are focused on developing the approach to inject two 28 nC bunches every second, up from the original design of one 10nC bunch every second. The solution requires several key changes concerning the injection and extraction kickers, charge accumulation via bunch merging and a carefully calibrated RF acceleration profile to match the longitudinal emittance required by the ESR.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-WEXA04
About •	paper received ※ 19 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 31 August 2021 issue date ※ 10 August 2021
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

WEPAB002	The Interaction Region of the Electron-Ion Collider EIC	2574
	H. Witte, J. Adam, M. Anerella, E.C. Aschenauer, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Blednykh, W. Christie, J.P. Cozzolino, K.A. Drees, D.M. Gassner, K. Hamdi, C. Hetzel, H.M. Hocker, D. Holmes, A. Jentsch, A. Kiselev, P. Kovach, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, G.J. Mahler, A. Marone, G.T. McIntyre, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, S. Peggs, S.R. Plate, V. Ptitsyn, G. Robert-Demolaize, C.E. Runyan, J. Schmalzle, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, P. Thieberger, J.E. Tuozzolo, F.J. Willeke, Q. Wu, Z. Zhang BNL, Upton, New York, USA B.R. Gamage, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, M.L. Stutzman, W. Wittmer JLab, Newport News, USA M.K. Sullivan SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
	Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy. This paper presents an overview of the Interaction Region (IR) design for the planned Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory. The IR is designed to meet the requirements of the nuclear physics community . The IR design features a ±4.5 m free space for the detector; a forward spectrometer magnet is used for the detection of hadrons scattered under small angles. The hadrons are separated from the neutrons allowing detection of neutrons up to ±4 mrad. On the rear side, the electrons are separated from photons using a weak dipole magnet for the luminosity monitor and to detect scattered electrons (e-tagger). To avoid synchrotron radiation backgrounds in the detector no strong electron bending magnet is placed within 40 m upstream of the IP. The magnet apertures on the rear side are large enough to allow synchrotron radiation to pass through the magnets. The beam pipe has been optimized to reduce the impedance; the total power loss in the central vacuum chamber is expected to be less than 90 W. To reduce risk and cost the IR is designed to employ standard NbTi superconducting magnets, which are described in a separate paper. An Assessment of U.S.-Based Electron-Ion Collider Science. (2018). Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25171
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-WEPAB002
About •	paper received ※ 18 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 25 June 2021 issue date ※ 31 August 2021
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

WEPAB005	Design Status Update of the Electron-Ion Collider	2585
	C. Montag, E.C. Aschenauer, G. Bassi, J. Beebe-Wang, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Blednykh, J.M. Brennan, S.J. Brooks, K.A. Brown, Z.A. Conway, K.A. Drees, A.V. Fedotov, W. Fischer, C. Folz, D.M. Gassner, X. Gu, R.C. Gupta, Y. Hao, A. Hershcovitch, C. Hetzel, D. Holmes, H. Huang, W.A. Jackson, J. Kewisch, Y. Li, C. Liu, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, M. Mapes, D. Marx, G.T. McIntyre, F. Méot, M.G. Minty, S.K. Nayak, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, S. Peggs, B. Podobedov, V. Ptitsyn, V.H. Ranjbar, G. Robert-Demolaize, S. Seletskiy, V.V. Smaluk, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, R. Than, P. Thieberger, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, J.E. Tuozzolo, S. Verdú-Andrés, E. Wang, D. Weiss, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu, W. Xu, A. Zaltsman, W. Zhang BNL, Upton, New York, USA S.V. Benson, J.M. Grames, F. Lin, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, E.A. Nissen, J.P. Preble, R.A. Rimmer, T. Satogata, A. Seryi, M. Wiseman, W. Wittmer, Y. Zhang JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA Y. Cai, Y.M. Nosochkov, G. Stupakov, M.K. Sullivan SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA K.E. Deitrick, C.M. Gulliford, G.H. Hoffstaetter, J.E. Unger Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA E. Gianfelice-Wendt Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA T. Satogata ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA D. Xu FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
	Funding: Work supported by BSA, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704, by JSA, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177, and by SLAC under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The design of the electron-ion collider EIC to be constructed at Brookhaven National Laboratory has been continuously evolving towards a realistic and robust design that meets all the requirements set forth by the nuclear physics community in the White Paper. Over the past year activities have been focused on maturing the design, and on developing alternatives to mitigate risk. These include improvements of the interaction region design as well as modifications of the hadron ring vacuum system to accommodate the high average and peak beam currents. Beam dynamics studies have been performed to determine and optimize the dynamic aperture in the two collider rings and the beam-beam performance. We will present the EIC design with a focus on recent developments.
	Poster WEPAB005 [2.095 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-WEPAB005
About •	paper received ※ 14 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 22 June 2021 issue date ※ 16 August 2021
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPAB015	Studies of the Imperfection in Crab Crossing Scheme for Electron-Ion Collider	3784
	Y. Hao, J.S. Berg, D. Holmes, Y. Luo, C. Montag BNL, Upton, New York, USA V.S. Morozov JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA J. Qiang LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA D. Xu FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
	Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy. Crab crossing scheme is the essential scheme that accommodates large crossing angle without loss of luminosity in the design of Electron-Ion collider (EIC). The ideal optics and phase advances of the crab cavity pair are set to create a local crabbing bump in the interaction region (IR). However, there are always small errors in the actual lattice of IR. In this article, we will present the simulation and analytical studies on the imperfections in the crab crossing scheme in the EIC design. The tolerance of the imperfection and the possible remedies can be concluded from these studies.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-THPAB015
About •	paper received ※ 17 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 16 July 2021 issue date ※ 12 August 2021
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPAB029	Dynamic Aperture Evaluation for the Hadron Storage Ring in the Electron-Ion Collider	3812
	Y. Luo, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, X. Gu, H. Lovelace III, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, S. Peggs, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte BNL, Upton, New York, USA Y. Hao, D. Xu FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA H. Huang ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA V.S. Morozov, E.A. Nissen, T. Satogata JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA J. Qiang LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
	Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) is aiming at a design luminosity of 1e34 cm^-2s⁻¹. To maintain such a high luminosity, both beams in the EIC need an acceptable beam lifetime in the presence of the beam-beam interaction. For this purpose, we carried out weak-strong element-by-element particle tracking to evaluate the long-term dynamic aperture for the hadron ring lattice design. We improved our simulation code SimTrack to treat some new lattice design features, such as radially offset on-momentum orbits, coordinate transformations in the interaction region, etc. In this article, we will present the preliminary dynamic aperture calculation results with β^*- function scan, radial orbit shift, crossing angle collision, and magnetic field errors.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-THPAB029
About •	paper received ※ 17 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 01 September 2021 issue date ※ 28 August 2021
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPAB121	Plasma Muon Beam Cooling for HEP	3999
	M.A. Cummings, R.J. Abrams, R.P. Johnson, S.A. Kahn, T.J. Roberts Muons, Inc, Illinois, USA V.S. Morozov, A.V. Sy JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA K. Yonehara Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
	Ionization cooling has the potential to shrink the phase space of a muon beam by a factor of 10⁶ within the muons’ short lifetime (2.2 µs) because the collision frequency in a cooling medium is extremely high compared to conventional beam cooling methods. It has been realized that ionization cooling inherently produces a plasma of free electrons inside the absorber material, and this plasma can have an important effect on the muon beam. In particular, under the right circumstances, it can both improve the rate of cooling and reduce the equilibrium emittance of the beam. This has the potential to improve the performance of muon facilities based on muon cooling; in particular a future muon collider. We describe how this project will integrate Plasma muon beam cooling into both the basic Helical Cooling Channel (HCC) and extreme Parametric-resonance Ionization Cooling (PIC) techniques. This potentially whole new approach to muon cooling has exciting prospects for significantly reduced muon beam emittance.
	Poster THPAB121 [1.214 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-THPAB121
About •	paper received ※ 19 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 12 July 2021 issue date ※ 11 August 2021
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPAB174	T-BMT Spin Resonance Tracker Code for He3 with Six Snakes	4101
	V.H. Ranjbar, H. Huang, Y. Luo, F. Méot, V. Ptitsyn BNL, Upton, New York, USA G.H. Hoffstaetter, D. Sagan Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA F. Lin, V.S. Morozov JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
	Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy . Polarization lifetime for He3 using two and six snakes are studied using the T-BMT Spin Resonance Tracker code. This code integrates a reduced spinor form of the T-BMT equation including only several spin resonances and the kinematics of synchrotron motion. It was previously benchmarked against RHIC polarization lifetime under the two snake system . Phys. Rev.Accel. Beams 22 (2019) 9, 091001
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-THPAB174
About •	paper received ※ 20 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 02 July 2021 issue date ※ 28 August 2021
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

Paper

Title

Page

20-24 GeV FFA CEBAF Energy Upgrade

715

S.A. Bogacz, J.F. Benesch, R.M. Bodenstein, B.R. Gamage, G.A. Krafft, V.S. Morozov, Y. Roblin
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
J.S. Berg, S.J. Brooks, D. Trbojevic
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
D. Douglas
Douglas Consulting, York, Virginia, USA
G.H. Hoffstaetter
Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA

Funding: This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics under contract DE-AC05-06OR23177
A proposal was formulated to increase the CEBAF energy from the present 12 GeV to 20-24 GeV by replacing the highest-energy arcs with Fixed Field Alternating Gradient (FFA) arcs. The new pair of arcs would provide six or seven new beam passes, going through this magnet array, allowing the energy to be nearly doubled using the existing CEBAF SRF cavity system. One of the immediate accelerator design tasks is to develop a proof-of-principle FFA arc magnet lattice that would support simultaneous transport of 6-7 passes with energies spanning a factor of two. We also examine the possibility of using combined function magnets to configure a cascade, six-way beam split switchyard. Finally, a novel multi-pass linac optics based on a weakly focusing lattice is being explored.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-MOPAB216

About •

paper received ※ 19 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 02 June 2021 issue date ※ 29 August 2021

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

MOPAB240

Estimates of Damped Equilibrium Energy Spread and Emittance in a Dual Energy Storage Ring

774

B. Dhital, G.A. Krafft
ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
Y.S. Derbenev, D. Douglas, A. Hutton, G.A. Krafft, F. Lin, V.S. Morozov, Y. Zhang
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA

Funding: Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, and Office of Nuclear Physics under Contracts DE-AC05-06OR23177 and DE-AC02-06CH11357. / Jefferson Lab EIC Fellowship2020.
A dual energy storage ring design consists of two loops at markedly different energies. As in a single-energy storage ring, the linear optics in the ring design may be used to determine the damped equilibrium emittance and energy spread. Because the individual radiation events in the two rings are different and independent, we can provide analytical estimates of the damping times in a dual energy storage ring. Using the damping times, the values of damped energy spread, and emittance can be determined for a range of parameters related to lattice design and rings energies. We present analytical calculations along with simulation results to estimate the values of damped energy spread and emittance in a dual energy storage ring. We note that the damping time tends to be dominated by the damping time of the high energy ring in cases where the energy of the high energy rings is significantly greater than that of the low energy ring.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-MOPAB240

About •

paper received ※ 17 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 27 May 2021 issue date ※ 13 August 2021

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUXA07

Beam Dynamics Study in a Dual Energy Storage Ring for Ion Beam Cooling*

1290

B. Dhital, G.A. Krafft
ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
Y.S. Derbenev, D. Douglas, A. Hutton, G.A. Krafft, F. Lin, V.S. Morozov, Y. Zhang
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA

Funding: * Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, and Office of Nuclear Physics under Contracts DE-AC05-06OR23177 and DE-AC02-06CH11357. / Jefferson Lab EIC Fellowship2020.
A dual energy storage ring designed for beam cooling consists of two closed rings with significantly different energies: the cooling and damping rings. These two rings are connected by an energy recovering superconducting RF structure that provides the necessary energy difference. In our design, the RF acceleration has a main linac and harmonic cavities both running at crest that at first accelerates the beam from low energy E_L to high energy E_H and then decelerates the beam from E_H to E_L in the next pass. The purpose of the harmonic cavities is to extend the bunch length in a dual energy storage ring as such a longer bunch length may be very useful in a cooling application. Besides these cavities, a bunching cavity running on zero-crossing phase is used outside of the common beamline to provide the necessary longitudinal focusing for the system. In this paper, we present a preliminary lattice design along with the fundamental beam dynamics study in such a dual energy storage ring.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUXA07

About •

paper received ※ 19 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 07 June 2021 issue date ※ 28 August 2021

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPAB040

Design Concept for the Second Interaction Region for Electron-Ion Collider

1435

B.R. Gamage, V. Burkert, R. Ent, Y. Furletova, D.W. Higinbotham, A. Hutton, F. Lin, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, D. Romanov, T. Satogata, A. Seryi, A.V. Sy, C. Weiss, M. Wiseman, W. Wittmer, Y. Zhang
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
E.C. Aschenauer, J.S. Berg, A. Jentsch, A. Kiselev, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
C. Hyde
ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
P. Nadel-Turonski
SBU, Stony Brook, New York, USA

Funding: Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177 and Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
The possibility of two interaction regions (IRs) is a design requirement for Electron-Ion Collider (EIC). There is also a significant interest from the nuclear physics community to have a 2nd IR with measurement capabilities complementary to those of the 1st IR. While the 2nd IR will be in operation over the entire energy range of ~20GeV to ~140GeV center of mass (CM). The 2nd IR can also provide an acceptance coverage complementary to that of the 1st. In this paper, we present a brief overview and the current progress of the 2nd IR design in terms of the parameters, magnet layout, and beam dynamics.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUPAB040

About •

paper received ※ 24 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 31 August 2021 issue date ※ 30 August 2021

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPAB041

Detector Solenoid Compensation for the Electron-Ion Collider

1439

B.R. Gamage, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, A. Seryi, W. Wittmer, Y. Zhang
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
E. Gianfelice-Wendt
Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
A. Kiselev, H. Lovelace III, B. Parker, S. Peggs, S. Tepikian, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu
BNL, Upton, New York, USA

Funding: Jefferson Science Associates, LLC Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177, Fermi Research Alliance, LLC Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359, and Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC Contract No. DE-SC0012704
The central detector in the present EIC design includes a 4 m long solenoid with an integrated strength of up to 12 Tm. The electron beam passes on-axis through the solenoid, but the hadron beam has an angle of 25 mrad. Thus the solenoid couples horizontal and vertical betatron motion in both electron and hadron storage rings, and causes a vertical closed orbit excursion in the hadron ring. The solenoid also couples the transverse and longitudinal motions of both beams, when crab cavities are also considered. In this paper, we present schemes for closed orbit correction and coupling compensation at the IP, including crabbing.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUPAB041

About •

paper received ※ 28 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 31 August 2021 issue date ※ 12 August 2021

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

WEXA04

The RCS Design Status for the Electron Ion Collider

2521

V.H. Ranjbar, M. Blaskiewicz, Z.A. Conway, D.M. Gassner, C. Hetzel, B. Lepore, H. Lovelace III, I. Marneris, F. Méot, C. Montag, J. Skaritka, N. Tsoupas, E. Wang, F.J. Willeke
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
J.M. Grames, J. Guo, F. Lin, V.S. Morozov, T. Satogata
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
D. Sagan
Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA

Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
The design of the Electron-Ion Collider Rapid Cycling Synchrotron (RCS) to be constructed at Brookhaven National Laboratory is advancing to meet the injection requirements for the Electron Storage Ring (ESR). Over the past year activities are focused on developing the approach to inject two 28 nC bunches every second, up from the original design of one 10nC bunch every second. The solution requires several key changes concerning the injection and extraction kickers, charge accumulation via bunch merging and a carefully calibrated RF acceleration profile to match the longitudinal emittance required by the ESR.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-WEXA04

About •

paper received ※ 19 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 31 August 2021 issue date ※ 10 August 2021

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

WEPAB002

The Interaction Region of the Electron-Ion Collider EIC

2574

H. Witte, J. Adam, M. Anerella, E.C. Aschenauer, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Blednykh, W. Christie, J.P. Cozzolino, K.A. Drees, D.M. Gassner, K. Hamdi, C. Hetzel, H.M. Hocker, D. Holmes, A. Jentsch, A. Kiselev, P. Kovach, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, G.J. Mahler, A. Marone, G.T. McIntyre, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, S. Peggs, S.R. Plate, V. Ptitsyn, G. Robert-Demolaize, C.E. Runyan, J. Schmalzle, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, P. Thieberger, J.E. Tuozzolo, F.J. Willeke, Q. Wu, Z. Zhang
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
B.R. Gamage, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, M.L. Stutzman, W. Wittmer
JLab, Newport News, USA
M.K. Sullivan
SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA

Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
This paper presents an overview of the Interaction Region (IR) design for the planned Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory. The IR is designed to meet the requirements of the nuclear physics community *. The IR design features a ±4.5 m free space for the detector; a forward spectrometer magnet is used for the detection of hadrons scattered under small angles. The hadrons are separated from the neutrons allowing detection of neutrons up to ±4 mrad. On the rear side, the electrons are separated from photons using a weak dipole magnet for the luminosity monitor and to detect scattered electrons (e-tagger). To avoid synchrotron radiation backgrounds in the detector no strong electron bending magnet is placed within 40 m upstream of the IP. The magnet apertures on the rear side are large enough to allow synchrotron radiation to pass through the magnets. The beam pipe has been optimized to reduce the impedance; the total power loss in the central vacuum chamber is expected to be less than 90 W. To reduce risk and cost the IR is designed to employ standard NbTi superconducting magnets, which are described in a separate paper.
* An Assessment of U.S.-Based Electron-Ion Collider Science. (2018). Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25171

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-WEPAB002

About •

paper received ※ 18 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 25 June 2021 issue date ※ 31 August 2021

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

WEPAB005

Design Status Update of the Electron-Ion Collider

2585

C. Montag, E.C. Aschenauer, G. Bassi, J. Beebe-Wang, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Blednykh, J.M. Brennan, S.J. Brooks, K.A. Brown, Z.A. Conway, K.A. Drees, A.V. Fedotov, W. Fischer, C. Folz, D.M. Gassner, X. Gu, R.C. Gupta, Y. Hao, A. Hershcovitch, C. Hetzel, D. Holmes, H. Huang, W.A. Jackson, J. Kewisch, Y. Li, C. Liu, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, M. Mapes, D. Marx, G.T. McIntyre, F. Méot, M.G. Minty, S.K. Nayak, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, S. Peggs, B. Podobedov, V. Ptitsyn, V.H. Ranjbar, G. Robert-Demolaize, S. Seletskiy, V.V. Smaluk, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, R. Than, P. Thieberger, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, J.E. Tuozzolo, S. Verdú-Andrés, E. Wang, D. Weiss, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu, W. Xu, A. Zaltsman, W. Zhang
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
S.V. Benson, J.M. Grames, F. Lin, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, E.A. Nissen, J.P. Preble, R.A. Rimmer, T. Satogata, A. Seryi, M. Wiseman, W. Wittmer, Y. Zhang
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
Y. Cai, Y.M. Nosochkov, G. Stupakov, M.K. Sullivan
SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
K.E. Deitrick, C.M. Gulliford, G.H. Hoffstaetter, J.E. Unger
Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA
E. Gianfelice-Wendt
Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
T. Satogata
ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
D. Xu
FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

Funding: Work supported by BSA, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704, by JSA, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177, and by SLAC under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
The design of the electron-ion collider EIC to be constructed at Brookhaven National Laboratory has been continuously evolving towards a realistic and robust design that meets all the requirements set forth by the nuclear physics community in the White Paper. Over the past year activities have been focused on maturing the design, and on developing alternatives to mitigate risk. These include improvements of the interaction region design as well as modifications of the hadron ring vacuum system to accommodate the high average and peak beam currents. Beam dynamics studies have been performed to determine and optimize the dynamic aperture in the two collider rings and the beam-beam performance. We will present the EIC design with a focus on recent developments.

Poster WEPAB005 [2.095 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-WEPAB005

About •

paper received ※ 14 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 22 June 2021 issue date ※ 16 August 2021

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPAB015

Studies of the Imperfection in Crab Crossing Scheme for Electron-Ion Collider

3784

Y. Hao, J.S. Berg, D. Holmes, Y. Luo, C. Montag
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
V.S. Morozov
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
J. Qiang
LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
D. Xu
FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
Crab crossing scheme is the essential scheme that accommodates large crossing angle without loss of luminosity in the design of Electron-Ion collider (EIC). The ideal optics and phase advances of the crab cavity pair are set to create a local crabbing bump in the interaction region (IR). However, there are always small errors in the actual lattice of IR. In this article, we will present the simulation and analytical studies on the imperfections in the crab crossing scheme in the EIC design. The tolerance of the imperfection and the possible remedies can be concluded from these studies.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-THPAB015

About •

paper received ※ 17 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 16 July 2021 issue date ※ 12 August 2021

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPAB029

Dynamic Aperture Evaluation for the Hadron Storage Ring in the Electron-Ion Collider

3812

Y. Luo, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, X. Gu, H. Lovelace III, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, S. Peggs, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
Y. Hao, D. Xu
FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
H. Huang
ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
V.S. Morozov, E.A. Nissen, T. Satogata
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
J. Qiang
LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA

Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
The Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) is aiming at a design luminosity of 1e34 cm^-2s⁻¹. To maintain such a high luminosity, both beams in the EIC need an acceptable beam lifetime in the presence of the beam-beam interaction. For this purpose, we carried out weak-strong element-by-element particle tracking to evaluate the long-term dynamic aperture for the hadron ring lattice design. We improved our simulation code SimTrack to treat some new lattice design features, such as radially offset on-momentum orbits, coordinate transformations in the interaction region, etc. In this article, we will present the preliminary dynamic aperture calculation results with β^*- function scan, radial orbit shift, crossing angle collision, and magnetic field errors.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-THPAB029

About •

paper received ※ 17 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 01 September 2021 issue date ※ 28 August 2021

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPAB121

Plasma Muon Beam Cooling for HEP

3999

M.A. Cummings, R.J. Abrams, R.P. Johnson, S.A. Kahn, T.J. Roberts
Muons, Inc, Illinois, USA
V.S. Morozov, A.V. Sy
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
K. Yonehara
Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA

Ionization cooling has the potential to shrink the phase space of a muon beam by a factor of 10⁶ within the muons’ short lifetime (2.2 µs) because the collision frequency in a cooling medium is extremely high compared to conventional beam cooling methods. It has been realized that ionization cooling inherently produces a plasma of free electrons inside the absorber material, and this plasma can have an important effect on the muon beam. In particular, under the right circumstances, it can both improve the rate of cooling and reduce the equilibrium emittance of the beam. This has the potential to improve the performance of muon facilities based on muon cooling; in particular a future muon collider. We describe how this project will integrate Plasma muon beam cooling into both the basic Helical Cooling Channel (HCC) and extreme Parametric-resonance Ionization Cooling (PIC) techniques. This potentially whole new approach to muon cooling has exciting prospects for significantly reduced muon beam emittance.

Poster THPAB121 [1.214 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-THPAB121

About •

paper received ※ 19 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 12 July 2021 issue date ※ 11 August 2021

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPAB174

T-BMT Spin Resonance Tracker Code for He3 with Six Snakes

4101

V.H. Ranjbar, H. Huang, Y. Luo, F. Méot, V. Ptitsyn
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
G.H. Hoffstaetter, D. Sagan
Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA
F. Lin, V.S. Morozov
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA

Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy .
Polarization lifetime for He3 using two and six snakes are studied using the T-BMT Spin Resonance Tracker code. This code integrates a reduced spinor form of the T-BMT equation including only several spin resonances and the kinematics of synchrotron motion. It was previously benchmarked against RHIC polarization lifetime under the two snake system *.
* Phys. Rev.Accel. Beams 22 (2019) 9, 091001

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-THPAB174

About •

paper received ※ 20 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 02 July 2021 issue date ※ 28 August 2021

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)