Author: Zhang, Y.
Paper Title Page
MOPAB004 JSPEC - A Simulation Program for IBS and Electron Cooling 49
 
  • H. Zhang, S.V. Benson, M.W. Bruker, Y. Zhang
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
 
  Funding: This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics under contract DE-AC05-06OR23177.
Intrabeam scattering is an important collective effect that can deteriorate the properties of a high-intensity beam, and electron cooling is a method to mitigate the IBS effect. JSPEC (JLab Simulation Package for Electron Cooling) is an open-source program developed at Jefferson Lab, which simulates the evolution of the ion beam under the IBS and/or the electron cooling effect. JSPEC has been benchmarked with BETACOOL and experimental data. In this report, we will introduce the features of JSPEC, including the friction force calculation, the IBS expansion rate and electron cooling rate calculation, and the beam-dynamic simulations for the electron cooling process; explain how to set up the simulations in JSPEC; and demonstrate the benchmarking results.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-MOPAB004  
About • paper received ※ 19 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 21 May 2021       issue date ※ 27 August 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
MOPAB240 Estimates of Damped Equilibrium Energy Spread and Emittance in a Dual Energy Storage Ring 774
 
  • B. Dhital, G.A. Krafft
    ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
  • Y.S. Derbenev, D. Douglas, A. Hutton, G.A. Krafft, F. Lin, V.S. Morozov, Y. Zhang
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, and Office of Nuclear Physics under Contracts DE-AC05-06OR23177 and DE-AC02-06CH11357. / Jefferson Lab EIC Fellowship2020.
A dual energy storage ring design consists of two loops at markedly different energies. As in a single-energy storage ring, the linear optics in the ring design may be used to determine the damped equilibrium emittance and energy spread. Because the individual radiation events in the two rings are different and independent, we can provide analytical estimates of the damping times in a dual energy storage ring. Using the damping times, the values of damped energy spread, and emittance can be determined for a range of parameters related to lattice design and rings energies. We present analytical calculations along with simulation results to estimate the values of damped energy spread and emittance in a dual energy storage ring. We note that the damping time tends to be dominated by the damping time of the high energy ring in cases where the energy of the high energy rings is significantly greater than that of the low energy ring.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-MOPAB240  
About • paper received ※ 17 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 27 May 2021       issue date ※ 13 August 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUXA07 Beam Dynamics Study in a Dual Energy Storage Ring for Ion Beam Cooling* 1290
 
  • B. Dhital, G.A. Krafft
    ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
  • Y.S. Derbenev, D. Douglas, A. Hutton, G.A. Krafft, F. Lin, V.S. Morozov, Y. Zhang
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
 
  Funding: * Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, and Office of Nuclear Physics under Contracts DE-AC05-06OR23177 and DE-AC02-06CH11357. / Jefferson Lab EIC Fellowship2020.
A dual energy storage ring designed for beam cooling consists of two closed rings with significantly different energies: the cooling and damping rings. These two rings are connected by an energy recovering superconducting RF structure that provides the necessary energy difference. In our design, the RF acceleration has a main linac and harmonic cavities both running at crest that at first accelerates the beam from low energy EL to high energy EH and then decelerates the beam from EH to EL in the next pass. The purpose of the harmonic cavities is to extend the bunch length in a dual energy storage ring as such a longer bunch length may be very useful in a cooling application. Besides these cavities, a bunching cavity running on zero-crossing phase is used outside of the common beamline to provide the necessary longitudinal focusing for the system. In this paper, we present a preliminary lattice design along with the fundamental beam dynamics study in such a dual energy storage ring.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUXA07  
About • paper received ※ 19 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 07 June 2021       issue date ※ 28 August 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUPAB040 Design Concept for the Second Interaction Region for Electron-Ion Collider 1435
 
  • B.R. Gamage, V. Burkert, R. Ent, Y. Furletova, D.W. Higinbotham, A. Hutton, F. Lin, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, D. Romanov, T. Satogata, A. Seryi, A.V. Sy, C. Weiss, M. Wiseman, W. Wittmer, Y. Zhang
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
  • E.C. Aschenauer, J.S. Berg, A. Jentsch, A. Kiselev, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
  • C. Hyde
    ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
  • P. Nadel-Turonski
    SBU, Stony Brook, New York, USA
 
  Funding: Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177 and Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
The possibility of two interaction regions (IRs) is a design requirement for Electron-Ion Collider (EIC). There is also a significant interest from the nuclear physics community to have a 2nd IR with measurement capabilities complementary to those of the 1st IR. While the 2nd IR will be in operation over the entire energy range of ~20GeV to ~140GeV center of mass (CM). The 2nd IR can also provide an acceptance coverage complementary to that of the 1st. In this paper, we present a brief overview and the current progress of the 2nd IR design in terms of the parameters, magnet layout, and beam dynamics.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUPAB040  
About • paper received ※ 24 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 31 August 2021       issue date ※ 30 August 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUPAB041 Detector Solenoid Compensation for the Electron-Ion Collider 1439
 
  • B.R. Gamage, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, A. Seryi, W. Wittmer, Y. Zhang
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
  • E. Gianfelice-Wendt
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
  • A. Kiselev, H. Lovelace III, B. Parker, S. Peggs, S. Tepikian, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
 
  Funding: Jefferson Science Associates, LLC Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177, Fermi Research Alliance, LLC Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359, and Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC Contract No. DE-SC0012704
The central detector in the present EIC design includes a 4 m long solenoid with an integrated strength of up to 12 Tm. The electron beam passes on-axis through the solenoid, but the hadron beam has an angle of 25 mrad. Thus the solenoid couples horizontal and vertical betatron motion in both electron and hadron storage rings, and causes a vertical closed orbit excursion in the hadron ring. The solenoid also couples the transverse and longitudinal motions of both beams, when crab cavities are also considered. In this paper, we present schemes for closed orbit correction and coupling compensation at the IP, including crabbing.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUPAB041  
About • paper received ※ 28 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 31 August 2021       issue date ※ 12 August 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUPAB181 Demonstration of Electron Cooling using a Pulsed Beam from an Electrostatic Electron Cooler 1827
 
  • M.W. Bruker, S.V. Benson, A. Hutton, K. Jordan, T. Powers, R.A. Rimmer, T. Satogata, A.V. Sy, H. Wang, S. Wang, H. Zhang, Y. Zhang
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
  • J. Li, F. Ma, X.M. Ma, L.J. Mao, X.P. Sha, M.T. Tang, J.C. Yang, X.D. Yang, H.W. Zhao
    IMP/CAS, Lanzhou, People’s Republic of China
  • H. Zhao
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
 
  Funding: This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics under contract DE-AC05-06OR23177.
Electron cooling continues to be an invaluable technique to reduce and maintain the emittance in hadron storage rings in cases where stochastic cooling is inefficient and radiative cooling is negligible. Extending the energy range of electron coolers beyond what is feasible with the conventional, electrostatic approach necessitates the use of RF fields for acceleration and, thus, a bunched electron beam. To experimentally investigate how the relative time structure of the two beams affects the cooling properties, we have set up a pulsed-beam cooling device by adding a synchronized pulsing circuit to the conventional electron source of the CSRm cooler at Institute of Modern Physics *. We show the effect of the electron bunch length and longitudinal ion focusing strength on the temporal evolution of the longitudinal and transverse ion beam profile and demonstrate the detrimental effect of timing jitter as predicted by theory and simulations. Compared to actual RF-based coolers, the simplicity and flexibility of our setup will facilitate further investigations of specific aspects of bunched cooling such as synchro-betatron coupling and phase dithering.
* M. W. Bruker et al., Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 24, 012801 (2021)
 
poster icon Poster TUPAB181 [3.699 MB]  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUPAB181  
About • paper received ※ 19 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 15 June 2021       issue date ※ 21 August 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
WEPAB004 Electron-Ion Luminosity Maximization in the EIC 2582
 
  • W. Fischer, E.C. Aschenauer, M. Blaskiewicz, K.A. Drees, A.V. Fedotov, H. Huang, C. Montag, V. Ptitsyn, D. Raparia, V. Schoefer, K.S. Smith, P. Thieberger, F.J. Willeke
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
  • Y. Zhang
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
The electron-ion luminosity in EIC has a number of limits, including the ion intensity available from the injectors, the total ion beam current, the electron bunch intensity, the total electron current, the synchrotron radiation power, the beam-beam effect, the achievable beta functions at the interaction points (IPs), the maximum angular spreads at the IP, the ion emittances reachable with stochastic or strong cooling, the ratio of horizontal to vertical emittance, and space charge effects. We map the e-A luminosity over the center-of-mass energy range for some ions ranging from deuterons to uranium ions. For e-Au collisions the present design provides for electron-nucleon (e-Au) peak luminosities of 1.7x1033 cm-2s−1 with stochastic cooling, and 4.7x1033 cm-2s−1 with strong hadron cooling.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-WEPAB004  
About • paper received ※ 18 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 21 June 2021       issue date ※ 20 August 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
WEPAB005 Design Status Update of the Electron-Ion Collider 2585
 
  • C. Montag, E.C. Aschenauer, G. Bassi, J. Beebe-Wang, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Blednykh, J.M. Brennan, S.J. Brooks, K.A. Brown, Z.A. Conway, K.A. Drees, A.V. Fedotov, W. Fischer, C. Folz, D.M. Gassner, X. Gu, R.C. Gupta, Y. Hao, A. Hershcovitch, C. Hetzel, D. Holmes, H. Huang, W.A. Jackson, J. Kewisch, Y. Li, C. Liu, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, M. Mapes, D. Marx, G.T. McIntyre, F. Méot, M.G. Minty, S.K. Nayak, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, S. Peggs, B. Podobedov, V. Ptitsyn, V.H. Ranjbar, G. Robert-Demolaize, S. Seletskiy, V.V. Smaluk, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, R. Than, P. Thieberger, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, J.E. Tuozzolo, S. Verdú-Andrés, E. Wang, D. Weiss, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu, W. Xu, A. Zaltsman, W. Zhang
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
  • S.V. Benson, J.M. Grames, F. Lin, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, E.A. Nissen, J.P. Preble, R.A. Rimmer, T. Satogata, A. Seryi, M. Wiseman, W. Wittmer, Y. Zhang
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
  • Y. Cai, Y.M. Nosochkov, G. Stupakov, M.K. Sullivan
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
  • K.E. Deitrick, C.M. Gulliford, G.H. Hoffstaetter, J.E. Unger
    Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA
  • E. Gianfelice-Wendt
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
  • T. Satogata
    ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
  • D. Xu
    FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by BSA, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704, by JSA, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177, and by SLAC under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
The design of the electron-ion collider EIC to be constructed at Brookhaven National Laboratory has been continuously evolving towards a realistic and robust design that meets all the requirements set forth by the nuclear physics community in the White Paper. Over the past year activities have been focused on maturing the design, and on developing alternatives to mitigate risk. These include improvements of the interaction region design as well as modifications of the hadron ring vacuum system to accommodate the high average and peak beam currents. Beam dynamics studies have been performed to determine and optimize the dynamic aperture in the two collider rings and the beam-beam performance. We will present the EIC design with a focus on recent developments.
 
poster icon Poster WEPAB005 [2.095 MB]  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-WEPAB005  
About • paper received ※ 14 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 22 June 2021       issue date ※ 16 August 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)