IPAC2021 - List of Authors (Sy, A.V.)

Paper	Title	Page
TUPAB040	Design Concept for the Second Interaction Region for Electron-Ion Collider	1435
	B.R. Gamage, V. Burkert, R. Ent, Y. Furletova, D.W. Higinbotham, A. Hutton, F. Lin, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, D. Romanov, T. Satogata, A. Seryi, A.V. Sy, C. Weiss, M. Wiseman, W. Wittmer, Y. Zhang JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA E.C. Aschenauer, J.S. Berg, A. Jentsch, A. Kiselev, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte BNL, Upton, New York, USA C. Hyde ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA P. Nadel-Turonski SBU, Stony Brook, New York, USA
	Funding: Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177 and Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The possibility of two interaction regions (IRs) is a design requirement for Electron-Ion Collider (EIC). There is also a significant interest from the nuclear physics community to have a 2nd IR with measurement capabilities complementary to those of the 1st IR. While the 2nd IR will be in operation over the entire energy range of ~20GeV to ~140GeV center of mass (CM). The 2nd IR can also provide an acceptance coverage complementary to that of the 1st. In this paper, we present a brief overview and the current progress of the 2nd IR design in terms of the parameters, magnet layout, and beam dynamics.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUPAB040
About •	paper received ※ 24 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 31 August 2021 issue date ※ 30 August 2021
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPAB181	Demonstration of Electron Cooling using a Pulsed Beam from an Electrostatic Electron Cooler	1827
	M.W. Bruker, S.V. Benson, A. Hutton, K. Jordan, T. Powers, R.A. Rimmer, T. Satogata, A.V. Sy, H. Wang, S. Wang, H. Zhang, Y. Zhang JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA J. Li, F. Ma, X.M. Ma, L.J. Mao, X.P. Sha, M.T. Tang, J.C. Yang, X.D. Yang, H.W. Zhao IMP/CAS, Lanzhou, People’s Republic of China H. Zhao BNL, Upton, New York, USA
	Funding: This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics under contract DE-AC05-06OR23177. Electron cooling continues to be an invaluable technique to reduce and maintain the emittance in hadron storage rings in cases where stochastic cooling is inefficient and radiative cooling is negligible. Extending the energy range of electron coolers beyond what is feasible with the conventional, electrostatic approach necessitates the use of RF fields for acceleration and, thus, a bunched electron beam. To experimentally investigate how the relative time structure of the two beams affects the cooling properties, we have set up a pulsed-beam cooling device by adding a synchronized pulsing circuit to the conventional electron source of the CSRm cooler at Institute of Modern Physics . We show the effect of the electron bunch length and longitudinal ion focusing strength on the temporal evolution of the longitudinal and transverse ion beam profile and demonstrate the detrimental effect of timing jitter as predicted by theory and simulations. Compared to actual RF-based coolers, the simplicity and flexibility of our setup will facilitate further investigations of specific aspects of bunched cooling such as synchro-betatron coupling and phase dithering. M. W. Bruker et al., Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 24, 012801 (2021)
	Poster TUPAB181 [3.699 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUPAB181
About •	paper received ※ 19 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 15 June 2021 issue date ※ 21 August 2021
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPAB121	Plasma Muon Beam Cooling for HEP	3999
	M.A. Cummings, R.J. Abrams, R.P. Johnson, S.A. Kahn, T.J. Roberts Muons, Inc, Illinois, USA V.S. Morozov, A.V. Sy JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA K. Yonehara Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
	Ionization cooling has the potential to shrink the phase space of a muon beam by a factor of 10⁶ within the muons’ short lifetime (2.2 µs) because the collision frequency in a cooling medium is extremely high compared to conventional beam cooling methods. It has been realized that ionization cooling inherently produces a plasma of free electrons inside the absorber material, and this plasma can have an important effect on the muon beam. In particular, under the right circumstances, it can both improve the rate of cooling and reduce the equilibrium emittance of the beam. This has the potential to improve the performance of muon facilities based on muon cooling; in particular a future muon collider. We describe how this project will integrate Plasma muon beam cooling into both the basic Helical Cooling Channel (HCC) and extreme Parametric-resonance Ionization Cooling (PIC) techniques. This potentially whole new approach to muon cooling has exciting prospects for significantly reduced muon beam emittance.
	Poster THPAB121 [1.214 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-THPAB121
About •	paper received ※ 19 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 12 July 2021 issue date ※ 11 August 2021
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

Paper

Title

Page

Design Concept for the Second Interaction Region for Electron-Ion Collider

1435

B.R. Gamage, V. Burkert, R. Ent, Y. Furletova, D.W. Higinbotham, A. Hutton, F. Lin, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, D. Romanov, T. Satogata, A. Seryi, A.V. Sy, C. Weiss, M. Wiseman, W. Wittmer, Y. Zhang
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
E.C. Aschenauer, J.S. Berg, A. Jentsch, A. Kiselev, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
C. Hyde
ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
P. Nadel-Turonski
SBU, Stony Brook, New York, USA

Funding: Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177 and Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
The possibility of two interaction regions (IRs) is a design requirement for Electron-Ion Collider (EIC). There is also a significant interest from the nuclear physics community to have a 2nd IR with measurement capabilities complementary to those of the 1st IR. While the 2nd IR will be in operation over the entire energy range of ~20GeV to ~140GeV center of mass (CM). The 2nd IR can also provide an acceptance coverage complementary to that of the 1st. In this paper, we present a brief overview and the current progress of the 2nd IR design in terms of the parameters, magnet layout, and beam dynamics.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUPAB040

About •

paper received ※ 24 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 31 August 2021 issue date ※ 30 August 2021

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPAB181

Demonstration of Electron Cooling using a Pulsed Beam from an Electrostatic Electron Cooler

1827

M.W. Bruker, S.V. Benson, A. Hutton, K. Jordan, T. Powers, R.A. Rimmer, T. Satogata, A.V. Sy, H. Wang, S. Wang, H. Zhang, Y. Zhang
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
J. Li, F. Ma, X.M. Ma, L.J. Mao, X.P. Sha, M.T. Tang, J.C. Yang, X.D. Yang, H.W. Zhao
IMP/CAS, Lanzhou, People’s Republic of China
H. Zhao
BNL, Upton, New York, USA

Funding: This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics under contract DE-AC05-06OR23177.
Electron cooling continues to be an invaluable technique to reduce and maintain the emittance in hadron storage rings in cases where stochastic cooling is inefficient and radiative cooling is negligible. Extending the energy range of electron coolers beyond what is feasible with the conventional, electrostatic approach necessitates the use of RF fields for acceleration and, thus, a bunched electron beam. To experimentally investigate how the relative time structure of the two beams affects the cooling properties, we have set up a pulsed-beam cooling device by adding a synchronized pulsing circuit to the conventional electron source of the CSRm cooler at Institute of Modern Physics *. We show the effect of the electron bunch length and longitudinal ion focusing strength on the temporal evolution of the longitudinal and transverse ion beam profile and demonstrate the detrimental effect of timing jitter as predicted by theory and simulations. Compared to actual RF-based coolers, the simplicity and flexibility of our setup will facilitate further investigations of specific aspects of bunched cooling such as synchro-betatron coupling and phase dithering.
* M. W. Bruker et al., Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 24, 012801 (2021)

Poster TUPAB181 [3.699 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUPAB181

About •

paper received ※ 19 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 15 June 2021 issue date ※ 21 August 2021

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPAB121

Plasma Muon Beam Cooling for HEP

3999

M.A. Cummings, R.J. Abrams, R.P. Johnson, S.A. Kahn, T.J. Roberts
Muons, Inc, Illinois, USA
V.S. Morozov, A.V. Sy
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
K. Yonehara
Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA

Ionization cooling has the potential to shrink the phase space of a muon beam by a factor of 10⁶ within the muons’ short lifetime (2.2 µs) because the collision frequency in a cooling medium is extremely high compared to conventional beam cooling methods. It has been realized that ionization cooling inherently produces a plasma of free electrons inside the absorber material, and this plasma can have an important effect on the muon beam. In particular, under the right circumstances, it can both improve the rate of cooling and reduce the equilibrium emittance of the beam. This has the potential to improve the performance of muon facilities based on muon cooling; in particular a future muon collider. We describe how this project will integrate Plasma muon beam cooling into both the basic Helical Cooling Channel (HCC) and extreme Parametric-resonance Ionization Cooling (PIC) techniques. This potentially whole new approach to muon cooling has exciting prospects for significantly reduced muon beam emittance.

Poster THPAB121 [1.214 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-THPAB121

About •

paper received ※ 19 May 2021 paper accepted ※ 12 July 2021 issue date ※ 11 August 2021

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)