IPAC2019 - List of Authors (Pfeiffer, S.)

Paper	Title	Page
THYPLS1	RF Controls Towards Femtosecond and Attosecond Precision	3414
	F. Ludwig, J. Branlard, Ł. Butkowski, M.K. Czwalinna, M. Hierholzer, M. Hoffmann, M. Killenberg, T. Lamb, J. Marjanovic, U. Mavrič, J.M. Müller, S. Pfeiffer, H. Schlarb, Ch. Schmidt, L. Springer DESY, Hamburg, Germany M. Kuntzsch, K. Zenker HZDR, Dresden, Germany
	In the past two decades, RF controls have improved by two orders in magnitude achieving meanwhile sub-10 fs phase stabilities and 10^-4 amplitude precision. Advances are through improved field detection methods and massive usage of digital signal procession on very powerful field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). The question rise, what can be achieved in the next 10 years? In this talk, a review is given of existing systems and strategies, current stability limitations of RF control system and new technologies with the potential to achieve attosecond resolutions.
	Slides THYPLS1 [10.328 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2019-THYPLS1
About •	paper received ※ 15 May 2019 paper accepted ※ 23 May 2019 issue date ※ 21 June 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPRB023	An MTCA.4 Based Position Feedback Application Using Laserinterferometers	3853
	K.P. Przygoda, Ł. Butkowski, S. Pfeiffer, H. Schlarb, P. Wiljes DESY, Hamburg, Germany
	To perform experiments on the nanometer scale at high brilliant x-ray light sources, it is highly recommended to have the mechanical components of the experiment, like lenses, mirrors and samples, as stable as possible. Since these components need to move from nanometer up to millimeter range they cannot be stabilized by only using rigid structures. For that reason an active stabilization system with fast and precise sensors needs to be developed. Here a Laserinterferometer is used, which provides picometer resolution at several MHz sample rate. In this paper we will present a laboratory setup which consists of a 6-slot Micro Telecommunication Computing Architecture generation 4 (MTCA.4) crate with standard components such MicroTCA carrier hub (MCH), central processing unit (CPU), power supply (PS) and cooling unit (CU). The Interferometer application has been setup with Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY) advanced mezzanine card (DAMC-FMC20) data processing unit, DESY Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) mezzanine card (DFMC-UNIO) universal input and output extension and DESY rear transition module (DRTM-PZT4) piezo driver. The encoder signals given by the interferometer controller are processed within the FPGA and then forwarded to the piezo amplifier RTM-board. The signal processing application includes decoding the digital feedback signal, calculating the coordinate transform for specific experimental setups and closed-loop operation based on a proportional integral derivative (PID) controller. The first results of the laboratory setup are demonstrated and briefly discussed.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2019-THPRB023
About •	paper received ※ 12 May 2019 paper accepted ※ 22 May 2019 issue date ※ 21 June 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPRB063	Field Control Challenges for Different LINAC Types	3946
SUSPFO095	use link to see paper's listing under its alternate paper code
	O. Troeng, A.J. Johansson Lund University, Lund, Sweden M. Eshraqi ESS, Lund, Sweden S. Pfeiffer DESY, Hamburg, Germany
	Linacs for free-electron lasers typically require cavity field stabilities of 0.01\% and 0.01 degree, while the requirements for high-intensity proton linacs are on the order of 0.1–1\% and 0.1–1 degrees. From these numbers it is easy to believe that the field control problem for proton linacs is many times easier than for free-electron lasers linacs. In this contribution we explain why this is not necessarily the case, and discuss the factors that make field control challenging. We also discuss the drivers for field stability, and how high-level decisions on the linac design affect the difficulty of the field control problem.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2019-THPRB063
About •	paper received ※ 15 May 2019 paper accepted ※ 22 May 2019 issue date ※ 21 June 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

Paper

Title

Page

RF Controls Towards Femtosecond and Attosecond Precision

3414

F. Ludwig, J. Branlard, Ł. Butkowski, M.K. Czwalinna, M. Hierholzer, M. Hoffmann, M. Killenberg, T. Lamb, J. Marjanovic, U. Mavrič, J.M. Müller, S. Pfeiffer, H. Schlarb, Ch. Schmidt, L. Springer
DESY, Hamburg, Germany
M. Kuntzsch, K. Zenker
HZDR, Dresden, Germany

In the past two decades, RF controls have improved by two orders in magnitude achieving meanwhile sub-10 fs phase stabilities and 10^-4 amplitude precision. Advances are through improved field detection methods and massive usage of digital signal procession on very powerful field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). The question rise, what can be achieved in the next 10 years? In this talk, a review is given of existing systems and strategies, current stability limitations of RF control system and new technologies with the potential to achieve attosecond resolutions.

Slides THYPLS1 [10.328 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2019-THYPLS1

About •

paper received ※ 15 May 2019 paper accepted ※ 23 May 2019 issue date ※ 21 June 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPRB023

An MTCA.4 Based Position Feedback Application Using Laserinterferometers

3853

K.P. Przygoda, Ł. Butkowski, S. Pfeiffer, H. Schlarb, P. Wiljes
DESY, Hamburg, Germany

To perform experiments on the nanometer scale at high brilliant x-ray light sources, it is highly recommended to have the mechanical components of the experiment, like lenses, mirrors and samples, as stable as possible. Since these components need to move from nanometer up to millimeter range they cannot be stabilized by only using rigid structures. For that reason an active stabilization system with fast and precise sensors needs to be developed. Here a Laserinterferometer is used, which provides picometer resolution at several MHz sample rate. In this paper we will present a laboratory setup which consists of a 6-slot Micro Telecommunication Computing Architecture generation 4 (MTCA.4) crate with standard components such MicroTCA carrier hub (MCH), central processing unit (CPU), power supply (PS) and cooling unit (CU). The Interferometer application has been setup with Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY) advanced mezzanine card (DAMC-FMC20) data processing unit, DESY Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) mezzanine card (DFMC-UNIO) universal input and output extension and DESY rear transition module (DRTM-PZT4) piezo driver. The encoder signals given by the interferometer controller are processed within the FPGA and then forwarded to the piezo amplifier RTM-board. The signal processing application includes decoding the digital feedback signal, calculating the coordinate transform for specific experimental setups and closed-loop operation based on a proportional integral derivative (PID) controller. The first results of the laboratory setup are demonstrated and briefly discussed.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2019-THPRB023

About •

paper received ※ 12 May 2019 paper accepted ※ 22 May 2019 issue date ※ 21 June 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

THPRB063

Field Control Challenges for Different LINAC Types

3946

SUSPFO095

use link to see paper's listing under its alternate paper code

O. Troeng, A.J. Johansson
Lund University, Lund, Sweden
M. Eshraqi
ESS, Lund, Sweden
S. Pfeiffer
DESY, Hamburg, Germany

Linacs for free-electron lasers typically require cavity field stabilities of 0.01\% and 0.01 degree, while the requirements for high-intensity proton linacs are on the order of 0.1–1\% and 0.1–1 degrees. From these numbers it is easy to believe that the field control problem for proton linacs is many times easier than for free-electron lasers linacs. In this contribution we explain why this is not necessarily the case, and discuss the factors that make field control challenging. We also discuss the drivers for field stability, and how high-level decisions on the linac design affect the difficulty of the field control problem.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2019-THPRB063

About •

paper received ※ 15 May 2019 paper accepted ※ 22 May 2019 issue date ※ 21 June 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)