Author: Nagaitsev, S.
Paper Title Page
MOOHC2 The US Electron Ion Collider Accelerator Designs 1
 
  • A. Seryi, S.V. Benson, S.A. Bogacz, P.D. Brindza, M.W. Bruker, A. Camsonne, E. Daly, P. Degtiarenko, Y.S. Derbenev, M. Diefenthaler, J. Dolbeck, R. Ent, R. Fair, D. Fazenbaker, Y. Furletova, B.R. Gamage, D. Gaskell, R.L. Geng, P. Ghoshal, J.M. Grames, J. Guo, F.E. Hannon, L. Harwood, S. Henderson, H. Huang, A. Hutton, K. Jordan, D.H. Kashy, A.J. Kimber, G.A. Krafft, R. Lassiter, R. Li, F. Lin, M.A. Mamun, F. Marhauser, R. McKeown, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, P. Nadel-Turonski, E.A. Nissen, G.-T. Park, H. Park, M. Poelker, T. Powers, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, R.A. Rimmer, Y. Roblin, D. Romanov, P. Rossi, T. Satogata, M.F. Spata, R. Suleiman, A.V. Sy, C. Tennant, H. Wang, S. Wang, C. Weiss, M. Wiseman, W. Wittmer, R. Yoshida, H. Zhang, S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z.W. Zhao
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
  • D.T. Abell, D.L. Bruhwiler, I.V. Pogorelov
    RadiaSoft LLC, Boulder, Colorado, USA
  • E.C. Aschenauer, G. Bassi, J. Beebe-Wang, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Blednykh, J.M. Brennan, S.J. Brooks, K.A. Brown, K.A. Drees, A.V. Fedotov, W. Fischer, D.M. Gassner, W. Guo, Y. Hao, A. Hershcovitch, H. Huang, W.A. Jackson, J. Kewisch, A. Kiselev, V. Litvinenko, C. Liu, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, F. Méot, M.G. Minty, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, S. Peggs, V. Ptitsyn, V.H. Ranjbar, G. Robert-Demolaize, T. Roser, S. Seletskiy, V.V. Smaluk, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, P. Thieberger, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, E. Wang, W.-T. Weng, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu, W. Xu, A. Zaltsman, W. Zhang
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
  • D.P. Barber
    DESY, Hamburg, Germany
  • I.V. Bazarov
    Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
  • G.I. Bell, J.R. Cary
    Tech-X, Boulder, Colorado, USA
  • Y. Cai, Y.M. Nosochkov, A. Novokhatski, G. Stupakov, M.K. Sullivan, C.-Y. Tsai
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
  • Z.A. Conway, M.P. Kelly, B. Mustapha, U. Wienands, A. Zholents
    ANL, Lemont, Illinois, USA
  • S.U. De Silva, J.R. Delayen, H. Huang, C. Hyde, S. Sosa, B. Terzić
    ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
  • K.E. Deitrick, G.H. Hoffstaetter
    Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA
  • D. Douglas
    Douglas Consulting, York, Virginia, USA
  • V.G. Dudnikov, R.P. Johnson
    Muons, Inc, Illinois, USA
  • B. Erdelyi, P. Piot
    Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
  • J.D. Fox
    Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
  • J. Gerity, T.L. Mann, P.M. McIntyre, N. Pogue, A. Sattarov
    Texas A&M University, College Station, USA
  • E. Gianfelice-Wendt, S. Nagaitsev
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
  • Y. Hao, P.N. Ostroumov, A.S. Plastun, R.C. York
    FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
  • T. Mastoridis
    CalPoly, San Luis Obispo, California, USA
  • J.D. Maxwell, R. Milner, M. Musgrave
    MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  • J. Qiang, G.L. Sabbi
    LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
  • D. Teytelman
    Dimtel, Redwood City, California, USA
  • R.C. York
    NSCL, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
  
  With the completion of the National Academies of Sciences Assessment of a US Electron-Ion Collider, the prospects for construction of such a facility have taken a step forward. This paper provides an overview of the two site-specific EIC designs: JLEIC (Jefferson Lab) and eRHIC (BNL) as well as brief overview of ongoing EIC R&D.  
slides icon Slides MOOHC2 [14.774 MB]  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOOHC2  
About • paper received ※ 29 August 2019       paper accepted ※ 04 September 2019       issue date ※ 08 October 2019  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUPLM08 Experimental Studies of Single Invariant Quasi-Integrable Nonlinear Optics at IOTA 383
SUPLM19   use link to see paper's listing under its alternate paper code  
 
  • N. Kuklev, Y.K. Kim
    University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  • S. Nagaitsev, A.L. Romanov, A. Valishev
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
  
  Funding: Work supported by National Science Foundation award PHY-1549132, the Center for Bright Beams. Fermi Research Alliance operates Fermilab under Contract DE-AC02-07CH11359 with the US Dept. of Energy.
The Integrable Optics Test Accelerator is a research electron and proton storage ring recently commissioned at the Fermilab Accelerator Science and Technology facility. Its research program is focused on testing novel techniques for improving beam stability and quality, notably the concept of non-linear integrable optics. In this paper, we report on run 1 results of experimental studies of a quasi-integrable transverse focusing system with one invariant of motion, a Henon-Heiles type system implemented with octupole magnets. Good agreement with simulations is demonstrated on key parameters of achievable tune spread, dynamic aperture, and invariant conservation. We also outline current simulation and hardware improvement efforts for run 2, planned for fall of 2019. 		 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-TUPLM08  
About • paper received ※ 28 August 2019       paper accepted ※ 05 September 2019       issue date ※ 08 October 2019  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
WEXBA2 Recent Results and Opportunities at the IOTA Facility 599
 
  • A.L. Romanov, D.R. Broemmelsiek, K. Carlson, D.J. Crawford, N. Eddy, D.R. Edstrom, J.D. Jarvis, V.A. Lebedev, S. Nagaitsev, J. Ruan, J.K. Santucci, V.D. Shiltsev, G. Stancari, A. Valishev, A. Warner
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
  • S. Chattopadhyay, S. Szustkowski
    Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
  • Y.K. Kim, N. Kuklev, I. Lobach
    University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  
  The Integrable Optics Test Accelerator (IOTA) was recently commissioned as part of the Fermilab Accelerator Science and Technology (FAST) facility. The IOTA ring was briefly operated with electrons at 47 MeV followed by a 6-months run with 100 MeV electrons. The main goal of the first run was to study beam dynamics in the integrable lattices with elliptical nonlinear magnets and in the quasi-integrable case with profiled octupole channel. The flexibility of the IOTA ring allowed a wide range of complementary studies, such as experiments with a single electron; studies of fluctuations in undulator radiation and operation with low emittance beams. Over the next year the proton injector will be installed and two runs carried out. One run will be dedicated to the refinement of nonlinear experiments and another will be dedicated to the proof-of-principle demonstration of Optical Stochastic Cooling.  
slides icon Slides WEXBA2 [12.702 MB]  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-WEXBA2  
About • paper received ※ 31 August 2019       paper accepted ※ 05 September 2019       issue date ※ 08 October 2019  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
WEYBB3 Foil Scattering Model for Fermilab Booster 632
WEPLH14   use link to see paper's listing under its alternate paper code  
 
  • C.M. Bhat, S. Chaurize, J.S. Eldred, V.A. Lebedev, S. Nagaitsev, K. Seiya, C.-Y. Tan, R. Tesarek
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
  
  Funding: This manuscript has been authored by Fermi Research Alliance, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359 with the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics.
At the Fermilab Booster, and many other proton facilities, an intense proton beam is accumulated by injection an H− beam through a stripping foil. The circulating beam scatters off the injection beam and large-angle Coulomb scattering leads to uncontrolled losses concentrated in the first betatron period. We measure the foil scattering rate in the Booster as a function of linac current, number of injection-turns, and time on injection foil. We find that current Booster operations has a 1% foil scattering loss rate and we make projections for the Proton Improvement Plan II (PIP-II) injector upgrade. We find that accurate modeling of the foil scattering loss must account for beam emittance in conjunction with the scattering rate and ring acceptance. Estimate of beam emittance at injection are discussed. 		 
slides icon Slides WEYBB3 [5.690 MB]  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-WEYBB3  
About • paper received ※ 28 August 2019       paper accepted ※ 02 September 2019       issue date ※ 08 October 2019  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
THYBA5 Study of Fluctuations in Undulator Radiation in the IOTA Ring at Fermilab 934
SUPLH03   use link to see paper's listing under its alternate paper code  
TUPLH13   use link to see paper's listing under its alternate paper code  
 
  • I. Lobach
    University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  • A. Halavanau, Z. Huang, V. Yakimenko
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
  • K. Kim
    ANL, Lemont, Illinois, USA
  • V.A. Lebedev, S. Nagaitsev, A.L. Romanov, G. Stancari
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
  • A.Y. Murokh
    RadiaBeam, Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • T.V. Shaftan
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
  
  We study turn-by-turn fluctuations in the number of emitted photons in an undulator, installed in the IOTA electron storage ring at Fermilab, with an InGaAs PIN photodiode and an integrating circuit. In this paper, we present a theoretical model for the experimental data from previous similar experiments and in our present experiment, we attempt to verify the model in an independent and a more systematic way. Moreover, in our experiment we consider the regime of very small fluctuation when the contribution from the photon shot noise is significant, whereas we believe it was negligible in the previous experiments. Accordingly, we present certain critical improvements in the experimental setup that let us measure such a small fluctuation.  
slides icon Slides THYBA5 [8.048 MB]  
poster icon Poster THYBA5 [3.079 MB]  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-THYBA5  
About • paper received ※ 24 August 2019       paper accepted ※ 05 September 2019       issue date ※ 08 October 2019  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
FRXBA1
 Review of Recent Advances in Cooling Techniques  
 
  • S. Nagaitsev
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
  
  Beam cooling plays an important role in future electron-ion colliders. The talk will review recent advances in cooling techniques. It will especially discuss variants of electron cooling such as e.g., coherent and micro-bunched electron cooling. Other cooling technique, e.g. optical stochastic cooling will also be presented.  
slides icon Slides FRXBA1 [8.091 MB]  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)