LINAC2012 - List of Authors (Wang, M.-H.)

Paper

Title

Page

Emittance Control for Different FACET Beam Setups in the SLAC Linac

138

F.-J. Decker, W.S. Colocho, N. Lipkowitz, Y. Nosochkov, J. Sheppard, H. Smith, Y. Sun, M.-H. Wang, G.R. White, U. Wienands, M. Woodley, G. Yocky
SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA

Funding: Work supported by U.S. Department of Energy, Contract DE-AC02-76SF00515.
The linac beam at SLAC requires different setups for different users at FACET (Facility for Advanced aCcelerator Experimental Tests) area, like highly compressed, intense bunches, or lower charge, long bunches. These require typically a lengthy tuning effort since with a energy-time correlation ("chirp") bunch transverse wakefield kicks can be compensated with dispersive trajectory oscillations and vice versa. Lowering the charge or changing the bunch length will destroy this delicate balance. Besides the typical steering to minimize BPMs (Beam Position Monitors) with correctors, we applied different techniques to try to localize beam disturbances like dispersion with phase changes, RF-kicks and RF quadrupole fields turning a klystron off and on, or varying the phase, and finally wakefield kicks with different beam intensities. It is also important to quantify BPM to quadrupole offsets with "bow-tie" plot and that the correctors give the expected kicks with orbit response matrix measurements.

Slides MOPLB01 [0.826 MB]

MOPB001

Emittance Control for Different FACET Beam Setups in the SLAC Linac

174

F.-J. Decker, W.S. Colocho, N. Lipkowitz, Y. Nosochkov, J. Sheppard, H. Smith, Y. Sun, M.-H. Wang, G.R. White, U. Wienands, M. Woodley, G. Yocky
SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA

Funding: Work supported by U.S. Department of Energy, Contract DE-AC02-76SF00515.
The linac beam at SLAC requires different setups for different users at FACET (Facility for Advanced aCcelerator Experimental Tests) area, like highly compressed, intense bunches, or lower charge, long bunches. These require typically a lengthy tuning effort since with a energy-time correlation ("chirp") bunch transverse wakefield kicks can be compensated with dispersive trajectory oscillations and vice versa. Lowering the charge or changing the bunch length will destroy this delicate balance. Besides the typical steering to minimize BPMs (Beam Position Monitors) with correctors, we applied different techniques to try to localize beam disturbances like dispersion with phase changes, RF-kicks and RF quadrupole fields turning a klystron off and on, or varying the phase, and finally wakefield kicks with different beam intensities. It is also important to quantify BPM to quadrupole offsets with "bow-tie" plot and that the correctors give the expected kicks with orbit response matrix measurements.

Paper	Title	Page
MOPLB01	Emittance Control for Different FACET Beam Setups in the SLAC Linac	138
	F.-J. Decker, W.S. Colocho, N. Lipkowitz, Y. Nosochkov, J. Sheppard, H. Smith, Y. Sun, M.-H. Wang, G.R. White, U. Wienands, M. Woodley, G. Yocky SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
	Funding: Work supported by U.S. Department of Energy, Contract DE-AC02-76SF00515. The linac beam at SLAC requires different setups for different users at FACET (Facility for Advanced aCcelerator Experimental Tests) area, like highly compressed, intense bunches, or lower charge, long bunches. These require typically a lengthy tuning effort since with a energy-time correlation ("chirp") bunch transverse wakefield kicks can be compensated with dispersive trajectory oscillations and vice versa. Lowering the charge or changing the bunch length will destroy this delicate balance. Besides the typical steering to minimize BPMs (Beam Position Monitors) with correctors, we applied different techniques to try to localize beam disturbances like dispersion with phase changes, RF-kicks and RF quadrupole fields turning a klystron off and on, or varying the phase, and finally wakefield kicks with different beam intensities. It is also important to quantify BPM to quadrupole offsets with "bow-tie" plot and that the correctors give the expected kicks with orbit response matrix measurements.
	Slides MOPLB01 [0.826 MB]

MOPB001	Emittance Control for Different FACET Beam Setups in the SLAC Linac	174
	F.-J. Decker, W.S. Colocho, N. Lipkowitz, Y. Nosochkov, J. Sheppard, H. Smith, Y. Sun, M.-H. Wang, G.R. White, U. Wienands, M. Woodley, G. Yocky SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
	Funding: Work supported by U.S. Department of Energy, Contract DE-AC02-76SF00515. The linac beam at SLAC requires different setups for different users at FACET (Facility for Advanced aCcelerator Experimental Tests) area, like highly compressed, intense bunches, or lower charge, long bunches. These require typically a lengthy tuning effort since with a energy-time correlation ("chirp") bunch transverse wakefield kicks can be compensated with dispersive trajectory oscillations and vice versa. Lowering the charge or changing the bunch length will destroy this delicate balance. Besides the typical steering to minimize BPMs (Beam Position Monitors) with correctors, we applied different techniques to try to localize beam disturbances like dispersion with phase changes, RF-kicks and RF quadrupole fields turning a klystron off and on, or varying the phase, and finally wakefield kicks with different beam intensities. It is also important to quantify BPM to quadrupole offsets with "bow-tie" plot and that the correctors give the expected kicks with orbit response matrix measurements.