Author: Peggs, S.
Paper Title Page
TUPAB036 The Accelerator Design Progress for EIC Strong Hadron Cooling 1424
 
  • E. Wang, S. Peggs, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke, W. Xu
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
  • S.V. Benson
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
  • D. Douglas
    Douglas Consulting, York, Virginia, USA
  • C.M. Gulliford, G.H. Hoffstaetter
    Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA
  • C.E. Mayes
    Xelera Research LLC, Ithaca, New York, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy,
The Electron-Ion Collider will achieve a luminosity of 1034 cm-2 s−1 by incorporating strong hadron cooling to counteract hadron Intra-Beam Scattering, using a coherent electron cooling scheme. An accelerator will deliver the beams with key parameters, such as 1 nC bunch charge, and 1e-4 energy spread. The paper presents the design and beam dynamics simulation results. Methods to minimize beam noise, the challenges of the accelerator design, and the R&D topics being pursued are discussed.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUPAB036  
About • paper received ※ 16 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 11 June 2021       issue date ※ 01 September 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUPAB041 Detector Solenoid Compensation for the Electron-Ion Collider 1439
 
  • B.R. Gamage, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, A. Seryi, W. Wittmer, Y. Zhang
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
  • E. Gianfelice-Wendt
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
  • A. Kiselev, H. Lovelace III, B. Parker, S. Peggs, S. Tepikian, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
 
  Funding: Jefferson Science Associates, LLC Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177, Fermi Research Alliance, LLC Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359, and Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC Contract No. DE-SC0012704
The central detector in the present EIC design includes a 4 m long solenoid with an integrated strength of up to 12 Tm. The electron beam passes on-axis through the solenoid, but the hadron beam has an angle of 25 mrad. Thus the solenoid couples horizontal and vertical betatron motion in both electron and hadron storage rings, and causes a vertical closed orbit excursion in the hadron ring. The solenoid also couples the transverse and longitudinal motions of both beams, when crab cavities are also considered. In this paper, we present schemes for closed orbit correction and coupling compensation at the IP, including crabbing.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUPAB041  
About • paper received ※ 28 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 31 August 2021       issue date ※ 12 August 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUPAB042 Large Radial Shifts in the EIC Hadron Storage Ring 1443
 
  • S. Peggs, J.S. Berg, K.A. Drees, X. Gu, C. Liu, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, G.J. Marr, A. Marusic, F. Méot, R.J. Michnoff, V. Ptitsyn, G. Robert-Demolaize, M. Valette, S. Verdú-Andrés
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
  • K.E. Deitrick
    Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA
  • B.R. Gamage
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
The Electron Ion Collider will collide hadrons in the Hadron Storage Ring (HSR) with ultra-relativistic electrons in the Electron Storage Ring. The HSR design trajectory includes a large radial shift over a large fraction of its circumference, in order to adjust the hadron path length to synchronize collisions over a broad range of hadron energies. The design trajectory goes on-axis through the magnets, crab cavities and other components in the six HSR Insertion Regions. This paper discusses the issues involved and reports on past and future beam experiments in the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, which will be upgraded to become the HSR.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUPAB042  
About • paper received ※ 18 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 15 June 2021       issue date ※ 21 August 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUPAB260 A Beam Screen to Prepare the RHIC Vacuum Chamber for EIC Hadron Beams: Conceptual Design and Requirements 2066
 
  • S. Verdú-Andrés, M. Blaskiewicz, J.M. Brennan, X. Gu, R.C. Gupta, A. Hershcovitch, M. Mapes, G.T. McIntyre, J.F. Muratore, S.K. Nayak, S. Peggs, V. Ptitsyn, R. Than, J.E. Tuozzolo, D. Weiss
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
The Electon Ion Collider (EIC) hadron ring will use the existing Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider storage rings, including the superconducting magnet arcs. The vacuum chambers in the superconducting magnets and the cold mass interconnects were not designed for EIC beams and so must be updated to reduce its resistive-wall heating and to suppress electron clouds. To do so without compromising the EIC luminosity goal, a stainless steel beam screen with co-laminated copper and a thin layer of amorphous carbon will be installed. This paper describes the main requirements that our solution for the hadron ring vacuum chamber needs to satisfy, including impedance, aperture limitations, vacuum, thermal and structural stability, mechanical design, installation and operation. The conceptual design of the beam screen currently under development is introduced.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUPAB260  
About • paper received ※ 19 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 25 August 2021       issue date ※ 12 August 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUPAB381 Thermal Analysis of the RHIC Arc Dipole Magnet Cold Mass with the EIC Beam Screen 2413
 
  • S.K. Nayak, M. Anerella, M. Blaskiewicz, J.M. Brennan, R.C. Gupta, M. Mapes, G.T. McIntyre, S. Peggs, R. Than, J.E. Tuozzolo, S. Verdú-Andrés, D. Weiss
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
 
  Funding: Funding agency Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
The EIC will make use of the existing RHIC storage rings with their superconducting (SC) magnet arcs. A stainless-steel beam screen with co-laminated copper and a thin amorphous carbon (aC) film on the inner surface will be installed in the beam pipe of the SC magnets. The copper will reduce the beam-induced resistive-wall (RW) heating from operation with the higher intensity EIC beams, that if not addressed would make the magnets quench. Limiting the RW heating is also important to achieve an adequately low vacuum level. The aC coating will reduce secondary electron yield which could also cause heating and limit intensity. Among all the RHIC SC magnets, the arc dipoles present the biggest challenge to the design and installation of beam screens. The arc dipoles, which make up for 78% (2.5 km) length of all SC magnets in RHIC, expect the largest RW heating due to their smallest aperture. These magnets are also the longest (9.45 m each), thus experiencing the largest temperature rise over their length, and have a large sagitta (48.5 mm) that increases the difficulty to install the beam screen in place. This paper presents a detailed thermal analysis of the magnet-screen system.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-TUPAB381  
About • paper received ※ 19 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 20 July 2021       issue date ※ 23 August 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
WEPAB002 The Interaction Region of the Electron-Ion Collider EIC 2574
 
  • H. Witte, J. Adam, M. Anerella, E.C. Aschenauer, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Blednykh, W. Christie, J.P. Cozzolino, K.A. Drees, D.M. Gassner, K. Hamdi, C. Hetzel, H.M. Hocker, D. Holmes, A. Jentsch, A. Kiselev, P. Kovach, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, G.J. Mahler, A. Marone, G.T. McIntyre, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, S. Peggs, S.R. Plate, V. Ptitsyn, G. Robert-Demolaize, C.E. Runyan, J. Schmalzle, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, P. Thieberger, J.E. Tuozzolo, F.J. Willeke, Q. Wu, Z. Zhang
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
  • B.R. Gamage, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, M.L. Stutzman, W. Wittmer
    JLab, Newport News, USA
  • M.K. Sullivan
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
This paper presents an overview of the Interaction Region (IR) design for the planned Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory. The IR is designed to meet the requirements of the nuclear physics community *. The IR design features a ±4.5 m free space for the detector; a forward spectrometer magnet is used for the detection of hadrons scattered under small angles. The hadrons are separated from the neutrons allowing detection of neutrons up to ±4 mrad. On the rear side, the electrons are separated from photons using a weak dipole magnet for the luminosity monitor and to detect scattered electrons (e-tagger). To avoid synchrotron radiation backgrounds in the detector no strong electron bending magnet is placed within 40 m upstream of the IP. The magnet apertures on the rear side are large enough to allow synchrotron radiation to pass through the magnets. The beam pipe has been optimized to reduce the impedance; the total power loss in the central vacuum chamber is expected to be less than 90 W. To reduce risk and cost the IR is designed to employ standard NbTi superconducting magnets, which are described in a separate paper.
* An Assessment of U.S.-Based Electron-Ion Collider Science. (2018). Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25171
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-WEPAB002  
About • paper received ※ 18 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 25 June 2021       issue date ※ 31 August 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
WEPAB005 Design Status Update of the Electron-Ion Collider 2585
 
  • C. Montag, E.C. Aschenauer, G. Bassi, J. Beebe-Wang, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Blednykh, J.M. Brennan, S.J. Brooks, K.A. Brown, Z.A. Conway, K.A. Drees, A.V. Fedotov, W. Fischer, C. Folz, D.M. Gassner, X. Gu, R.C. Gupta, Y. Hao, A. Hershcovitch, C. Hetzel, D. Holmes, H. Huang, W.A. Jackson, J. Kewisch, Y. Li, C. Liu, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, M. Mapes, D. Marx, G.T. McIntyre, F. Méot, M.G. Minty, S.K. Nayak, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, S. Peggs, B. Podobedov, V. Ptitsyn, V.H. Ranjbar, G. Robert-Demolaize, S. Seletskiy, V.V. Smaluk, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, R. Than, P. Thieberger, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, J.E. Tuozzolo, S. Verdú-Andrés, E. Wang, D. Weiss, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu, W. Xu, A. Zaltsman, W. Zhang
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
  • S.V. Benson, J.M. Grames, F. Lin, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, E.A. Nissen, J.P. Preble, R.A. Rimmer, T. Satogata, A. Seryi, M. Wiseman, W. Wittmer, Y. Zhang
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
  • Y. Cai, Y.M. Nosochkov, G. Stupakov, M.K. Sullivan
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
  • K.E. Deitrick, C.M. Gulliford, G.H. Hoffstaetter, J.E. Unger
    Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA
  • E. Gianfelice-Wendt
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
  • T. Satogata
    ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
  • D. Xu
    FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by BSA, LLC under Contract No. DE-SC0012704, by JSA, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177, and by SLAC under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
The design of the electron-ion collider EIC to be constructed at Brookhaven National Laboratory has been continuously evolving towards a realistic and robust design that meets all the requirements set forth by the nuclear physics community in the White Paper. Over the past year activities have been focused on maturing the design, and on developing alternatives to mitigate risk. These include improvements of the interaction region design as well as modifications of the hadron ring vacuum system to accommodate the high average and peak beam currents. Beam dynamics studies have been performed to determine and optimize the dynamic aperture in the two collider rings and the beam-beam performance. We will present the EIC design with a focus on recent developments.
 
poster icon Poster WEPAB005 [2.095 MB]  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-WEPAB005  
About • paper received ※ 14 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 22 June 2021       issue date ※ 16 August 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
THPAB007 Technology Spinoff and Lessons Learned from the 4-Turn ERL CBETA 3762
 
  • K.E. Deitrick, N. Banerjee, A.C. Bartnik, D.C. Burke, J.A. Crittenden, J. Dobbins, C.M. Gulliford, G.H. Hoffstaetter, Y. Li, W. Lou, P. Quigley, D. Sagan, K.W. Smolenski
    Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA
  • J.S. Berg, S.J. Brooks, R.L. Hulsart, G.J. Mahler, F. Méot, R.J. Michnoff, S. Peggs, T. Roser, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
  • T. Miyajima
    KEK, Ibaraki, Japan
 
  The Cornell-BNL ERL Test Accelerator (CBETA) developed several energy-saving measures: multi-turn energy recovery, low-loss superconducting radiofrequency (SRF) cavities, and permanent magnets. With green technology becoming imperative for new high-power accelerators, the lessons learned will be important for projects like the FCC-ee or new light sources, where spinoffs and lessons learned from CBETA are already considered for modern designs.  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-THPAB007  
About • paper received ※ 20 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 05 July 2021       issue date ※ 12 August 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
THPAB028 Beam-Beam Related Design Parameter Optimization for the Electron-Ion Collider 3808
 
  • Y. Luo, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, X. Gu, H. Lovelace III, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, S. Peggs, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
  • Y. Hao, D. Xu
    FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
  • H. Huang
    ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
  • E.A. Nissen, T. Satogata
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
  • J. Qiang
    LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
The design luminosity goal for the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) is 1e34 cm-2s−1. To achieve such a high luminosity, the EIC design adopts high bunch intensities, flat beams at the interaction point (IP) with a small vertical β*-function, and a high collision frequency, together with crab cavities to compensate the geometrical luminosity loss due to the large crossing angle of 25mrad. In this article, we present our strategies and approaches to obtain the design luminosity by optimizing some key beam-beam related design parameters. Through our extensive strong-strong and weak-strong beam-beam simulations, we found that beam flatness, electron and proton beam size matching at the IP, electron and proton working points, and synchro-betatron resonances arising from the crossing angle collision play a crucial role in proton beam size growth and luminosity degradation. After optimizing those parameters, we found a set of beam-beam related design parameters to reach the design luminosity with an acceptable beam-beam performance.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-THPAB028  
About • paper received ※ 17 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 28 July 2021       issue date ※ 25 August 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
THPAB029 Dynamic Aperture Evaluation for the Hadron Storage Ring in the Electron-Ion Collider 3812
 
  • Y. Luo, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, X. Gu, H. Lovelace III, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, S. Peggs, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
  • Y. Hao, D. Xu
    FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
  • H. Huang
    ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
  • V.S. Morozov, E.A. Nissen, T. Satogata
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
  • J. Qiang
    LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
The Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) is aiming at a design luminosity of 1e34 cm-2s−1. To maintain such a high luminosity, both beams in the EIC need an acceptable beam lifetime in the presence of the beam-beam interaction. For this purpose, we carried out weak-strong element-by-element particle tracking to evaluate the long-term dynamic aperture for the hadron ring lattice design. We improved our simulation code SimTrack to treat some new lattice design features, such as radially offset on-momentum orbits, coordinate transformations in the interaction region, etc. In this article, we will present the preliminary dynamic aperture calculation results with β*- function scan, radial orbit shift, crossing angle collision, and magnetic field errors.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-THPAB029  
About • paper received ※ 17 May 2021       paper accepted ※ 01 September 2021       issue date ※ 28 August 2021  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)