IPAC2011 - Classification: 01 Circular Colliders / T12 Beam Injection/Extraction and Transport

Paper	Title	Page
THPS055	Controlling Beamloss at Injection into the LHC	3553
	B. Goddard, F. Alessio, W. Bartmann, P. Baudrenghien, V. Boccone, C. Bracco, M. Brugger, K. Cornelis, B. Dehning, A. Di Mauro, L.N. Drosdal, E.B. Holzer, W. Höfle, R. Jacobsson, V. Kain, M. Meddahi, V. Mertens, A. Nordt, J.A. Uythoven, D. Valuch, S. Weisz, E.N. del Busto CERN, Geneva, Switzerland R. Appleby UMAN, Manchester, United Kingdom
	Losses at injection into the superconducting LHC can adversely affect the machine performance in several important ways. The high injected beam intensity and energy mean that precautions must be taken against damage and quenches, including collimators placed close to the beam in the injection regions. Clean injection is essential, to avoid spurious signals on the sensitive beam loss monitoring system which will trigger beam dumps. In addition, the use of the two injection insertions to house downstream high energy physics experiments brings constraints on permitted beam loss levels. In this paper the sources of injection beam loss are discussed together with the contributing factors and various issues experienced in the first full year of LHC operation. Simulations are compared with measurement, and the implemented and planned mitigation measures and diagnostic improvements are described. An outlook for future LHC operation is given.

THPZ024	Updated Design of the Italian SuperB Factory Injection System	3738
	S. Guiducci, M.E. Biagini, R. Boni, M.A. Preger, P. Raimondi INFN/LNF, Frascati (Roma), Italy J. Brossard, O. Dadoun, P. Lepercq, C. Rimbault, A. Variola LAL, Orsay, France A. Chancé CEA, Gif-sur-Yvette, France J.T. Seeman SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
	The ultra high luminosity B-factory (SuperB) project of INFN requires a high performance and reliable injection system, providing electrons at 4 GeV and positrons at 7 GeV, to fulfill the very tight requirements of the collider. Due to the short beam lifetime, continuous injection of electrons and positrons in both HER and LER rings is necessary to keep the average luminosity at a high level. An updated version of the injection system, optimized at higher repetition frequency is presented. This scheme includes a polarized electron gun, a positron production scheme with electron/positron conversion at low energy 0.6 GeV, and a 1 GeV damping ring to reduce the injected emittance of the positron beam.

THPZ025	Stability of the LHC Transfer lines	3741
	V. Kain, W. Bartmann, C. Bracco, L.N. Drosdal, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, J.A. Uythoven, J. Wenninger CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
	The LHC is filled from the SPS through two 3 km transfer lines. The injected beam parameters need to be well under control for luminosity performance, machine protection and operational efficiency. Small fractions of beam loss on the transfer line collimation system create showers which can trigger the sensitive LHC beam loss monitor system nearby and cause a beam abort during filling. The stability of the transfer line trajectory through the collimators is particularly critical in this respect. This paper will report on the transfer line trajectory stability during the proton run in 2011, correlations with injection losses, correction frequency and the most likely sources for the observed oscillations.

Paper

Title

Page

Controlling Beamloss at Injection into the LHC

3553

B. Goddard, F. Alessio, W. Bartmann, P. Baudrenghien, V. Boccone, C. Bracco, M. Brugger, K. Cornelis, B. Dehning, A. Di Mauro, L.N. Drosdal, E.B. Holzer, W. Höfle, R. Jacobsson, V. Kain, M. Meddahi, V. Mertens, A. Nordt, J.A. Uythoven, D. Valuch, S. Weisz, E.N. del Busto
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
R. Appleby
UMAN, Manchester, United Kingdom

Losses at injection into the superconducting LHC can adversely affect the machine performance in several important ways. The high injected beam intensity and energy mean that precautions must be taken against damage and quenches, including collimators placed close to the beam in the injection regions. Clean injection is essential, to avoid spurious signals on the sensitive beam loss monitoring system which will trigger beam dumps. In addition, the use of the two injection insertions to house downstream high energy physics experiments brings constraints on permitted beam loss levels. In this paper the sources of injection beam loss are discussed together with the contributing factors and various issues experienced in the first full year of LHC operation. Simulations are compared with measurement, and the implemented and planned mitigation measures and diagnostic improvements are described. An outlook for future LHC operation is given.

THPZ024

Updated Design of the Italian SuperB Factory Injection System

3738

S. Guiducci, M.E. Biagini, R. Boni, M.A. Preger, P. Raimondi
INFN/LNF, Frascati (Roma), Italy
J. Brossard, O. Dadoun, P. Lepercq, C. Rimbault, A. Variola
LAL, Orsay, France
A. Chancé
CEA, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
J.T. Seeman
SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA

The ultra high luminosity B-factory (SuperB) project of INFN requires a high performance and reliable injection system, providing electrons at 4 GeV and positrons at 7 GeV, to fulfill the very tight requirements of the collider. Due to the short beam lifetime, continuous injection of electrons and positrons in both HER and LER rings is necessary to keep the average luminosity at a high level. An updated version of the injection system, optimized at higher repetition frequency is presented. This scheme includes a polarized electron gun, a positron production scheme with electron/positron conversion at low energy 0.6 GeV, and a 1 GeV damping ring to reduce the injected emittance of the positron beam.

THPZ025

Stability of the LHC Transfer lines

3741

V. Kain, W. Bartmann, C. Bracco, L.N. Drosdal, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, J.A. Uythoven, J. Wenninger
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

The LHC is filled from the SPS through two 3 km transfer lines. The injected beam parameters need to be well under control for luminosity performance, machine protection and operational efficiency. Small fractions of beam loss on the transfer line collimation system create showers which can trigger the sensitive LHC beam loss monitor system nearby and cause a beam abort during filling. The stability of the transfer line trajectory through the collimators is particularly critical in this respect. This paper will report on the transfer line trajectory stability during the proton run in 2011, correlations with injection losses, correction frequency and the most likely sources for the observed oscillations.