Author: Drosdal, L.N.
Paper Title Page
THPZ025 Stability of the LHC Transfer lines 3741
 
  • V. Kain, W. Bartmann, C. Bracco, L.N. Drosdal, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, J.A. Uythoven, J. Wenninger
    CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
 
  The LHC is filled from the SPS through two 3 km transfer lines. The injected beam parameters need to be well under control for luminosity performance, machine protection and operational efficiency. Small fractions of beam loss on the transfer line collimation system create showers which can trigger the sensitive LHC beam loss monitor system nearby and cause a beam abort during filling. The stability of the transfer line trajectory through the collimators is particularly critical in this respect. This paper will report on the transfer line trajectory stability during the proton run in 2011, correlations with injection losses, correction frequency and the most likely sources for the observed oscillations.  
 
THPS055 Controlling Beamloss at Injection into the LHC 3553
 
  • B. Goddard, F. Alessio, W. Bartmann, P. Baudrenghien, V. Boccone, C. Bracco, M. Brugger, K. Cornelis, B. Dehning, A. Di Mauro, L.N. Drosdal, E.B. Holzer, W. Höfle, R. Jacobsson, V. Kain, M. Meddahi, V. Mertens, A. Nordt, J.A. Uythoven, D. Valuch, S. Weisz, E.N. del Busto
    CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
  • R. Appleby
    UMAN, Manchester, United Kingdom
 
  Losses at injection into the superconducting LHC can adversely affect the machine performance in several important ways. The high injected beam intensity and energy mean that precautions must be taken against damage and quenches, including collimators placed close to the beam in the injection regions. Clean injection is essential, to avoid spurious signals on the sensitive beam loss monitoring system which will trigger beam dumps. In addition, the use of the two injection insertions to house downstream high energy physics experiments brings constraints on permitted beam loss levels. In this paper the sources of injection beam loss are discussed together with the contributing factors and various issues experienced in the first full year of LHC operation. Simulations are compared with measurement, and the implemented and planned mitigation measures and diagnostic improvements are described. An outlook for future LHC operation is given.