IPAC2011 - List of Authors (Alessio, F.)

Paper	Title	Page
TUPZ031	Near Beam-gas Backgrounds for LHCb at 3.5 TeV	1876
	D.R. Brett, R. Appleby UMAN, Manchester, United Kingdom F. Alessio, G. Corti, R. Jacobsson CERN, Geneva, Switzerland M.H. Lieng UNIDO, Dortmund, Germany V. Talanov IHEP Protvino, Protvino, Moscow Region, Russia
	Funding: STFC We consider the machine induced backgrounds for LHCb arising from collisions of the beam with residual gas in the long straight sections of the LHC close to the experiment. We concentrate on the background particle fluxes initiated by inelastic beam-gas interactions with a direct line of sight to the experiment, with the potential impact on the experiment increasing for larger beam currents and changing gas pressures. In this paper we calculate the background rates for parameters foreseen with LHC running in 2011, using realistic residual pressure profiles. We also discuss the effect of using a pressure profile formulated in terms of equivalent hydrogen, through weighting of other residual gases by their cross section, upon the radial fluxes from the machine and the detector response. We present the expected rates and the error introduced through this approximation.

THPS055	Controlling Beamloss at Injection into the LHC	3553
	B. Goddard, F. Alessio, W. Bartmann, P. Baudrenghien, V. Boccone, C. Bracco, M. Brugger, K. Cornelis, B. Dehning, A. Di Mauro, L.N. Drosdal, E.B. Holzer, W. Höfle, R. Jacobsson, V. Kain, M. Meddahi, V. Mertens, A. Nordt, J.A. Uythoven, D. Valuch, S. Weisz, E.N. del Busto CERN, Geneva, Switzerland R. Appleby UMAN, Manchester, United Kingdom
	Losses at injection into the superconducting LHC can adversely affect the machine performance in several important ways. The high injected beam intensity and energy mean that precautions must be taken against damage and quenches, including collimators placed close to the beam in the injection regions. Clean injection is essential, to avoid spurious signals on the sensitive beam loss monitoring system which will trigger beam dumps. In addition, the use of the two injection insertions to house downstream high energy physics experiments brings constraints on permitted beam loss levels. In this paper the sources of injection beam loss are discussed together with the contributing factors and various issues experienced in the first full year of LHC operation. Simulations are compared with measurement, and the implemented and planned mitigation measures and diagnostic improvements are described. An outlook for future LHC operation is given.

Paper

Title

Page

Near Beam-gas Backgrounds for LHCb at 3.5 TeV

1876

D.R. Brett, R. Appleby
UMAN, Manchester, United Kingdom
F. Alessio, G. Corti, R. Jacobsson
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
M.H. Lieng
UNIDO, Dortmund, Germany
V. Talanov
IHEP Protvino, Protvino, Moscow Region, Russia

Funding: STFC
We consider the machine induced backgrounds for LHCb arising from collisions of the beam with residual gas in the long straight sections of the LHC close to the experiment. We concentrate on the background particle fluxes initiated by inelastic beam-gas interactions with a direct line of sight to the experiment, with the potential impact on the experiment increasing for larger beam currents and changing gas pressures. In this paper we calculate the background rates for parameters foreseen with LHC running in 2011, using realistic residual pressure profiles. We also discuss the effect of using a pressure profile formulated in terms of equivalent hydrogen, through weighting of other residual gases by their cross section, upon the radial fluxes from the machine and the detector response. We present the expected rates and the error introduced through this approximation.

THPS055

Controlling Beamloss at Injection into the LHC

3553

B. Goddard, F. Alessio, W. Bartmann, P. Baudrenghien, V. Boccone, C. Bracco, M. Brugger, K. Cornelis, B. Dehning, A. Di Mauro, L.N. Drosdal, E.B. Holzer, W. Höfle, R. Jacobsson, V. Kain, M. Meddahi, V. Mertens, A. Nordt, J.A. Uythoven, D. Valuch, S. Weisz, E.N. del Busto
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
R. Appleby
UMAN, Manchester, United Kingdom

Losses at injection into the superconducting LHC can adversely affect the machine performance in several important ways. The high injected beam intensity and energy mean that precautions must be taken against damage and quenches, including collimators placed close to the beam in the injection regions. Clean injection is essential, to avoid spurious signals on the sensitive beam loss monitoring system which will trigger beam dumps. In addition, the use of the two injection insertions to house downstream high energy physics experiments brings constraints on permitted beam loss levels. In this paper the sources of injection beam loss are discussed together with the contributing factors and various issues experienced in the first full year of LHC operation. Simulations are compared with measurement, and the implemented and planned mitigation measures and diagnostic improvements are described. An outlook for future LHC operation is given.