EPAC08 - List of Authors (Willeke, F. J.)

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Willeke, F. J.

Paper	Title	Page
WEPP052	A Storage Ring Based Option for the LHeC	2638
	F. J. Willeke BNL, Upton, New York F. Bordry, H.-H. Braun, O. S. Brüning, H. Burkhardt, J. M. Jowett, T. P.R. Linnecar, K. H. Mess, S. Myers, J. A. Osborne, F. Zimmermann CERN, Geneva S. Chattopadhyay Cockcroft Institute, Warrington, Cheshire J. B. Dainton, M. Klein Liverpool University, Science Faculty, Liverpool B. J. Holzer DESY, Hamburg
	The LHeC aims at the generation of Hadron-Lepton collisions with center of mass energies in the TeV scale and luminosities of the order of 10³³ cm^-2 sec^-1 by taking advantage of the existing LHC 7 TeV proton ring and adding a high energy electron accelerator. This paper presents technical considerations and potential parameter choices for such a machine and outlines some of the challenges arising when an electron storage ring based option, constructed within the existing infrastructure of the LHC, is chosen.
WEOAG01	Prospects for a Large Hadron Electron Collider (LHeC) at the LHC	1903
	M. Klein Liverpool University, Science Faculty, Liverpool H. Aksakal N. U, Nigde F. Bordry, H.-H. Braun, O. S. Brüning, H. Burkhardt, R. Garoby, J. M. Jowett, T. P.R. Linnecar, K. H. Mess, J. A. Osborne, L. Rinolfi, D. Schulte, R. Tomas, J. Tuckmantel, F. Zimmermann, A. de Roeck CERN, Geneva S. Chattopadhyay, J. B. Dainton Cockcroft Institute, Warrington, Cheshire A. K. Ciftci Ankara University, Faculty of Sciences, Tandogan/Ankara A. Eide EPFL, Lausanne B. J. Holzer DESY, Hamburg P. Newman Birmingham University, Birmingham E. Perez CEA, Gif-sur-Yvette S. Sultansoy TOBB ETU, Ankara A. Vivoli LAL, Orsay F. J. Willeke BNL, Upton, New York
	The LHeC collides a lepton beam with one of the intense, LHC, hadron beams. It achieves both e± interactions with quarks at the terascale, at eq masses in excess of 1 TeV, with a luminosity of about 10³³ cm^-2 s^-1, and it also enables a sub-femtoscopic probe of hadronic matter at unprecedented chromodynamic energy density, at Bjorken-x values down to 10^-6 in the deep inelastic scattering domain. The LHeC combines the LHC infrastructure with recent advances in radio-frequency, in linear acceleration and in other associated technologies, to enable two proposals for TeV ep collisions: a "ring-ring" option in which 7 TeV protons (and ions) collide with about 70 GeV electrons/positrons in a storage ring in the LHC tunnel and a "linac-ring" option based on an independent superconducting linear accelerator enabling single-pass collisions of electrons and positrons of up to about 140 GeV with an LHC hadron beam. Both options will be presented and compared. Steps are outlined for completing a Conceptual Design Review of the accelerator complex, beam delivery, luminosity, physics and implications for experiment, following declared support by ECFA and by CERN for a CDR.
	Slides
WEPC089	Status of the NSLS-II Injection System Design	2198
	T. V. Shaftan, A. Blednykh, G. Ganetis, W. Guo, R. Heese, H.-C. Hseuh, E. D. Johnson, S. Krinsky, Y. J. Li, R. Meier, S. Ozaki, I. Pinayev, M. Rehak, J. Rose, S. Sharma, O. Singh, J. Skaritka, N. Tsoupas, F. J. Willeke, L.-H. Yu BNL, Upton, New York
	NSLS-II is a new ultra-bright 3rd generation 3GeV light source planned to be built at Brookhaven National Laboratory. The design of this facility is well under way. The requirement for the compact injector complex which has to continuously provide 3GeV electrons for top off injection into the storage ring is very demanding: high reliability, low loss, relatively high charge (10nC). The injector consists of linear accelerator, a full-energy booster, as well as transport lines and injection straight section. A large three dimensional dynamic aperture through the entire acceleration cycle in the booster synchrotron is required. Tolerances on pulsed magnets for the beam transfer are very tight in order to minimize injection losses and disturbance of the stored beam in the main ring. The components of the injector are optimized for high reliability and availability. In this paper we give an overview of the NSLS-II injector, discuss status, specifications and design challenges.
WEPP154	Linac-LHC ep Collider Options	2847
	F. Zimmermann, F. Bordry, H.-H. Braun, O. S. Brüning, H. Burkhardt, R. Garoby, T. P.R. Linnecar, K. H. Mess, J. A. Osborne, L. Rinolfi, D. Schulte, R. Tomas, J. Tuckmantel, A. de Roeck CERN, Geneva H. Aksakal N. U, Nigde S. Chattopadhyay Cockcroft Institute, Warrington, Cheshire A. K. Ciftci Ankara University, Faculty of Sciences, Tandogan/Ankara J. B. Dainton Liverpool University, Science Faculty, Liverpool A. Eide EPFL, Lausanne B. J. Holzer DESY, Hamburg M. Klein University of Liverpool, Liverpool S. Sultansoy TOBB ETU, Ankara A. Vivoli LAL, Orsay F. J. Willeke BNL, Upton, New York
	We describe various parameter scenarios for a ring-linac ep collider based on LHC and an independent s.c. electron linac. Luminosities of order 10³²/cm²/s can be achieved with a standard ILC-like linac, operated either in pulsed or cw mode, with acceptable beam power. Reaching much higher luminosities, up to 10³⁴/cm²/s and beyond, would require the use of two linacs and the implementation of energy recovery. Advantages and challenges of a ring-linac ep collider vis-a-vis an alternative ring-ring collider are discussed.
THPC140	The Performance of a Fast Closed Orbit Feedback System with Combined Fast and Slow Correctors	3315
	L.-H. Yu, S. Krinsky, O. Singh, F. J. Willeke BNL, Upton, New York
	For NSLSII closed orbit feedback system, in order to reduce the noise caused by the step changes of the power supplies in the feedback system, the angular kick corresponding to the last bit of the power supplies for the fast correctors must be smaller than 3 nrad. On the other hand, in order to carry out closed orbit alignment or orbit correction after a long term drift, we need strong correctors with 0.8 mrad kick strength. In order to avoid the requirement of correctors with both large strength and very small minimum step size, we consider separate sets of slow correctors with large strength and fast correctors with smaller maximum strength. In order to avoid fast and slow feedback systems working in parallel, and avoid the possible interaction between two feedback systems, we consider the possibility of using only one fast feedback system with slow correctors periodically removing the DC components of the fast correctors so that the DC components in fast feedback system would not accumulate to reach saturation even after a large long term drift of the closed orbit motion. We report on simulation of the performance of this combined system for NSLSII in this paper. * NSLSII Preliminary Design Report (2007)