Author: Forck, P.
Paper Title Page
MOPME073 Measurement of Schottky-like Signals from Linac Bunched Hadron Beams for Momentum Spread Evaluation 649
 
  • P. Kowina, P. Forck, R. Singh
    GSI, Darmstadt, Germany
  • F. Caspers
    CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
  • R. Singh
    TEMF, TU Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
 
  We present a novel method for the measurement of Linac beam parameters in the longitudinal phase space. The longitudinal momentum spread can be evaluated by means of Schottky type signal analysis of bunched beams. There is a close similarity between a repetitive Linac bunch train and a circulating beam with a single short batch in a large machine like the LHC. A dedicated longitudinal cavity pick-up was used in the Linac where resonance frequency and Q-value were carefully selected in order to get an optimum compromise between the unavoidable coherent signal and the desired incoherent part of the beam spectrum. A time domain gating similar to the 4.8 GHz LHC Schottky front-end is applied. As a cross-check of the validity of the interpretation in terms of momentum spread, the Linac beam is analyzed in the downstream synchrotron using standard Schottky methods. In principle, this approach can be understood as an extension of Schottky analysis for circular machines with a perfect “mixing” between subsequent bunch trains. This contribution describes the test set-up and discusses the results of the measurements with a heavy ion beam.  
 
TUPWA007 Method and Results of Systematic Beam Matching to a Periodic DTL 1733
 
  • L. Groening, W.A. Barth, P. Forck, I. Hofmann, S.G. Yaramyshev
    GSI, Darmstadt, Germany
  • D. Jeon
    IBS, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
 
  Systematic investigations on high current 3d-beam matching to a periodic Alvarez-type DTL are reported. Twiss parameters at the entrance of a matching section to the periodic structure were concluded from transverse and longitudinal measurements. Periodic solutions in 3d were calculated including space charge using the measured rms emittances. The matching was performed by rms beam size tracking and employing a numerical routine to set the matching section, which comprises five quadrupoles and two bunchers. Matching allowed for significant emittance growth reduction and for verification of non-linear beam dynamics effects along the DTL.  
 
THPWO008 Status of the 70 MeV FAIR Proton Injector 3773
 
  • G. Clemente, W.A. Barth, R. Bereznov, P. Forck, L. Groening, R. Hollinger, M. Kaiser, A. Krämer, F. Maimone, C. Mühle, J. Pfister, G. Schreiber, J. Trüller, W. Vinzenz, C. Will
    GSI, Darmstadt, Germany
  • R. M. Brodhage, B. Koubek, H. Podlech, U. Ratzinger, A. Schempp, R. Tiede
    IAP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • N. Chauvin, O. Delferrière
    CEA/IRFU, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • B. Launé, J. Lesrel
    IPN, Orsay, France
  • C.S. Simon, O. Tuske
    CEA/DSM/IRFU, France
 
  Funding: BMBF
The FAIR project requires a dedicated proton injector for the creation of high intensity secondary antiproton beams. This machine will be the first high intensity linear accelerator based on CH-DTL. The status of the project, with particular emphasis on the construction of the first RF prototype is presented.
 
 
THPWO009 Beam Dynamics Error and Loss Investigation of the FAIR Proton Injector 3776
 
  • G. Clemente, W.A. Barth, P. Forck, L. Groening, R. Hollinger, M. Kaiser, J. Pfister, W. Vinzenz, S.G. Yaramyshev, C. Zhang
    GSI, Darmstadt, Germany
  • R. M. Brodhage, B. Koubek, H. Podlech, U. Ratzinger, A. Schempp, R. Tiede
    IAP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • N. Chauvin, C.S. Simon, O. Tuske
    CEA/DSM/IRFU, France
  • O. Delferrière
    CEA/IRFU, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • B. Launé, J. Lesrel
    IPN, Orsay, France
 
  The FAIR Proton Linac is a 70mA, 70 MeV. 325 MHz linear accelerator based on CH cavities. The focusing scheme is provided by an asynchronous KONUS lattice period. Random misalignment and rotation errors of the quadrupoles, together with phase and RF settings of the power source plays a major role in beam losses. Those effects are investigated and the beam dynamics results, including several source of errors, are presented and discussed.