Author: Perry, C.
Paper Title Page
TUPC22 Cavity Beam Position Monitor in Multiple Bunch Operation for the ATF2 Interaction Point Region 419
  • Y.I. Kim, D.R. Bett, N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, S.T. Boogert, P. Burrows, G.B. Christian, M.R. Davis, A. Lyapin, C. Perry
    JAI, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • J.C. Frisch, D.J. McCormick, J. Nelson, G.R. White
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
  • Y. Honda, T. Tauchi, N. Terunuma, J. Urakawa
    KEK, Ibaraki, Japan
  The Accelerator Test Facility 2 (ATF2) at KEK, Japan, is a scaled test beam line for the international linear collider (ILC) final focus system. There are two goals: firstly, to demonstrate focusing to 37 nm vertical beam size; secondly, to achieve a few nanometer level beam orbit stability at the focus point (the Interaction Point (IP)) in the vertical plane. High-resolution beam position monitors around the IP area (IPBPMs) have been developed in order to measure the electron beam position in that region with a resolution of a few nanometers in the vertical plane. Currently, the standard operation mode at ATF2 is single bunch, however, multiple bunch operation with a bunch spacing similar to the one foreseen for the ILC (around 300 ns) is also possible. IPBPMs have a low Q value resulting in a decay time of about 30 ns, and so should be able to measure the beam position of individual bunches without any significant performance degradation. The IPBPMs in the ATF2 extraction beam line have been tested in multibunch regime. This paper analyses the signals, processing methods and results for this mode.  
poster icon Poster TUPC22 [1.050 MB]  
TUPC38 Longitudinal Profile Monitor Using Smith-Purcell Radiation: Recent Results from the E-203 Collaboration 464
  • N. Delerue, J. Barros, S. Le Corre, M. Vieille Grosjean
    LAL, Orsay, France
  • H.L. Andrews
    LANL, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
  • F. Bakkali Taheri, R. Bartolini, G. Doucas, I.V. Konoplev, C. Perry, A. Reichold, S. Stevenson
    JAI, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • V. Bharadwaj, C.I. Clarke
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
  • N. Fuster Martinez
    IFIC, Valencia, Spain
  • M. Labat
    SOLEIL, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  Funding: Financial support from the John Adams Institute, the Fell Fund (University of Oxford), the Université Paris-Sud (programme 'Attractivité') and the French ANR (contract ANR-12-JS05-0003-01).
We report on recent measurements made at FACET by the E-203 collaboration to test a longitudinal bunch profile monitor based on Coherent Smith-Purcell radiation. The capacity of this monitor to resolve sub-picosecond bunches will be shown as well as a comparison of profile reconstructed for different beam compression settings. We will also present recent electromagnetic simulations of the interactions between the beam and the grating as well as the expected resolution of such monitor. Comparison between Coherent Smith-Purcell radiation measurement and those made with other techniques will also be discussed. Finally future upgrades of the experiment and steps toward the construction of a single shot longitudinal profile monitor will be presented.
WEBL2 Applications of Stripline and Cavity Beam Position Monitors in Low-Latency, High-Precision, Intra-Train Feedback Systems 630
  • M.R. Davis, D.R. Bett, N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, P. Burrows, G.B. Christian, Y.I. Kim, C. Perry
    JAI, Oxford, United Kingdom
  Two, low-latency, sub-micron beam position monitoring (BPM) systems have been developed and tested with beam at the KEK Accelerator Test Facility (ATF2). One system (‘upstream’), based on stripline BPMs uses fast analogue front-end signal processing and has demonstrated a position resolution as low as 400nm for beam intensities of ~1 nC, with single-pass beam. The other (‘IP’) system, based on low-Q cavity BPMs and utilising custom signal processing electronics designed for low latency, provides a single pass resolution of approximately 100nm. The BPM position data are digitised by fast ADCs on a custom FPGA-based feedback controller and used in three modes: 1) the upstream BPM data are used to drive a pair of local kickers nominally orthogonal in phase in closed-loop feedback mode; 2) the upstream BPM data are used to drive a downstream kicker in the ATF2 final focus region in feedforward mode; 3) the IP cavity BPM data are used to drive a local downstream kicker in the ATF2 final focus region in closed-loop feedback mode. In each case the beam jitter is measured downstream of the final focus system with the IP cavity BPMs. The relative performance of these systems is compared.  
slides icon Slides WEBL2 [1.934 MB]