NAPAC2019 - List of Authors (Willeke, F.J.)

Paper	Title	Page
MOOHC2	The US Electron Ion Collider Accelerator Designs	1
	A. Seryi, S.V. Benson, S.A. Bogacz, P.D. Brindza, M.W. Bruker, A. Camsonne, E. Daly, P. Degtiarenko, Y.S. Derbenev, M. Diefenthaler, J. Dolbeck, R. Ent, R. Fair, D. Fazenbaker, Y. Furletova, B.R. Gamage, D. Gaskell, R.L. Geng, P. Ghoshal, J.M. Grames, J. Guo, F.E. Hannon, L. Harwood, S. Henderson, H. Huang, A. Hutton, K. Jordan, D.H. Kashy, A.J. Kimber, G.A. Krafft, R. Lassiter, R. Li, F. Lin, M.A. Mamun, F. Marhauser, R. McKeown, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, P. Nadel-Turonski, E.A. Nissen, G.-T. Park, H. Park, M. Poelker, T. Powers, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, R.A. Rimmer, Y. Roblin, D. Romanov, P. Rossi, T. Satogata, M.F. Spata, R. Suleiman, A.V. Sy, C. Tennant, H. Wang, S. Wang, C. Weiss, M. Wiseman, W. Wittmer, R. Yoshida, H. Zhang, S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z.W. Zhao JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA D.T. Abell, D.L. Bruhwiler, I.V. Pogorelov RadiaSoft LLC, Boulder, Colorado, USA E.C. Aschenauer, G. Bassi, J. Beebe-Wang, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Blednykh, J.M. Brennan, S.J. Brooks, K.A. Brown, K.A. Drees, A.V. Fedotov, W. Fischer, D.M. Gassner, W. Guo, Y. Hao, A. Hershcovitch, H. Huang, W.A. Jackson, J. Kewisch, A. Kiselev, V. Litvinenko, C. Liu, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, F. Méot, M.G. Minty, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, S. Peggs, V. Ptitsyn, V.H. Ranjbar, G. Robert-Demolaize, T. Roser, S. Seletskiy, V.V. Smaluk, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, P. Thieberger, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, E. Wang, W.-T. Weng, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu, W. Xu, A. Zaltsman, W. Zhang BNL, Upton, New York, USA D.P. Barber DESY, Hamburg, Germany I.V. Bazarov Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA G.I. Bell, J.R. Cary Tech-X, Boulder, Colorado, USA Y. Cai, Y.M. Nosochkov, A. Novokhatski, G. Stupakov, M.K. Sullivan, C.-Y. Tsai SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA Z.A. Conway, M.P. Kelly, B. Mustapha, U. Wienands, A. Zholents ANL, Lemont, Illinois, USA S.U. De Silva, J.R. Delayen, H. Huang, C. Hyde, S. Sosa, B. Terzić ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA K.E. Deitrick, G.H. Hoffstaetter Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA D. Douglas Douglas Consulting, York, Virginia, USA V.G. Dudnikov, R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc, Illinois, USA B. Erdelyi, P. Piot Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA J.D. Fox Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA J. Gerity, T.L. Mann, P.M. McIntyre, N. Pogue, A. Sattarov Texas A&M University, College Station, USA E. Gianfelice-Wendt, S. Nagaitsev Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA Y. Hao, P.N. Ostroumov, A.S. Plastun, R.C. York FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA T. Mastoridis CalPoly, San Luis Obispo, California, USA J.D. Maxwell, R. Milner, M. Musgrave MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA J. Qiang, G.L. Sabbi LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA D. Teytelman Dimtel, Redwood City, California, USA R.C. York NSCL, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
	With the completion of the National Academies of Sciences Assessment of a US Electron-Ion Collider, the prospects for construction of such a facility have taken a step forward. This paper provides an overview of the two site-specific EIC designs: JLEIC (Jefferson Lab) and eRHIC (BNL) as well as brief overview of ongoing EIC R&D.
	Slides MOOHC2 [14.774 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOOHC2
About •	paper received ※ 29 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 04 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

MOYBA4	eRHIC Design Update	18
TUPLO11	use link to see paper's listing under its alternate paper code
	C. Montag, G. Bassi, J. Beebe-Wang, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Blednykh, J.M. Brennan, S.J. Brooks, K.A. Brown, K.A. Drees, A.V. Fedotov, W. Fischer, D.M. Gassner, Y. Hao, A. Hershcovitch, C. Hetzel, D. Holmes, H. Huang, W.A. Jackson, J. Kewisch, Y. Li, C. Liu, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, F. Méot, M.G. Minty, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, S. Peggs, V. Ptitsyn, V.H. Ranjbar, G. Robert-Demolaize, S. Seletskiy, V.V. Smaluk, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, P. Thieberger, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S. Verdú-Andrés, W.-T. Weng, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu, W. Xu, A. Zaltsman, W. Zhang BNL, Upton, New York, USA Y. Cai, Y.M. Nosochkov SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA E. Gianfelice-Wendt Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
	Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The future electron-ion collider (EIC) aims at an electron-proton luminosity of 10³³ to 10³⁴ cm^-2 sec^-1 and a center-of-mass energy range from 20 to 140 GeV. The eRHIC design has been continuously evolving over a couple of years and has reached a considerable level of maturity. The concept is generally conservative with very few risk items which are mitigated in various ways.
	Slides MOYBA4 [5.466 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOYBA4
About •	paper received ※ 24 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 31 August 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUZBA2	Electron Ion Collider Machine Detector Interface	335
	B. Parker, E.C. Aschenauer, A. Kiselev, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte BNL, Upton, New York, USA M. Diefenthaler, Y. Furletova, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, D. Romanov, A. Seryi, R. Yoshida JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA C. Hyde ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA M.K. Sullivan SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
	This presentation summarizes the physics requirements as they translate into accelerator requirements at the machine-detector interface. Unique aspects of the Interaction Region and detector acceptance – unique to an Electron Ion Collider – are summarized. Designs of both site-specific concepts are outlined.
	Slides TUZBA2 [13.525 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-TUZBA2
About •	paper received ※ 29 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 05 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPLO06	Weak-Strong Beam-Beam Simulation for eRHIC	545
	Y. Luo, G. Bassi, M. Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, C. Montag, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke BNL, Upton, New York, USA Y. Hao, D. Xu FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA J. Qiang LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
	Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy. In the eRHIC, to compensate the geometric luminosity loss due to the crossing angle, crab cavities are to be installed on both sides of the interaction point. When the proton bunch length is comparable to the wavelength of its crab cavities, protons will not be perfectly tilted in the x-z plane. In the article, we employ weak-strong beam-beam interaction model to calculate the proton beam size growth rates and luminosity degradation rate with various machine and time parameters. The goal of these studies is to optimize the the beam-beam related machine and beam parameters of eRHIC.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-TUPLO06
About •	paper received ※ 29 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 03 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPLO07	Calculation of Action Diffusion With Crabbed Collision in eRHIC	549
	Y. Luo, G. Bassi, M. Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, C. Montag, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke BNL, Upton, New York, USA Y. Hao, D. Xu FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA J. Qiang LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
	Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy. In the eRHIC, to compensate the geometric luminosity loss due to the crossing angle, crab cavities are to be installed on both sides of the interaction point. When the proton bunch length is comparable to the wavelength of its crab cavities, protons will not be perfectly tilted in the x-z plane. In the article, we develop a simulation code to calculate the transverse action diffusion rate as function of the initial proton longitudinal action. The goal of this study is to identify the contributions from various protons to the overall emittance growth. Tune scan is also performed to locate optimum working points which yield less proton emittance growth.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-TUPLO07
About •	paper received ※ 29 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 03 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

Paper

Title

Page

The US Electron Ion Collider Accelerator Designs

1

A. Seryi, S.V. Benson, S.A. Bogacz, P.D. Brindza, M.W. Bruker, A. Camsonne, E. Daly, P. Degtiarenko, Y.S. Derbenev, M. Diefenthaler, J. Dolbeck, R. Ent, R. Fair, D. Fazenbaker, Y. Furletova, B.R. Gamage, D. Gaskell, R.L. Geng, P. Ghoshal, J.M. Grames, J. Guo, F.E. Hannon, L. Harwood, S. Henderson, H. Huang, A. Hutton, K. Jordan, D.H. Kashy, A.J. Kimber, G.A. Krafft, R. Lassiter, R. Li, F. Lin, M.A. Mamun, F. Marhauser, R. McKeown, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, P. Nadel-Turonski, E.A. Nissen, G.-T. Park, H. Park, M. Poelker, T. Powers, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, R.A. Rimmer, Y. Roblin, D. Romanov, P. Rossi, T. Satogata, M.F. Spata, R. Suleiman, A.V. Sy, C. Tennant, H. Wang, S. Wang, C. Weiss, M. Wiseman, W. Wittmer, R. Yoshida, H. Zhang, S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z.W. Zhao
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
D.T. Abell, D.L. Bruhwiler, I.V. Pogorelov
RadiaSoft LLC, Boulder, Colorado, USA
E.C. Aschenauer, G. Bassi, J. Beebe-Wang, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Blednykh, J.M. Brennan, S.J. Brooks, K.A. Brown, K.A. Drees, A.V. Fedotov, W. Fischer, D.M. Gassner, W. Guo, Y. Hao, A. Hershcovitch, H. Huang, W.A. Jackson, J. Kewisch, A. Kiselev, V. Litvinenko, C. Liu, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, F. Méot, M.G. Minty, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, S. Peggs, V. Ptitsyn, V.H. Ranjbar, G. Robert-Demolaize, T. Roser, S. Seletskiy, V.V. Smaluk, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, P. Thieberger, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, E. Wang, W.-T. Weng, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu, W. Xu, A. Zaltsman, W. Zhang
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
D.P. Barber
DESY, Hamburg, Germany
I.V. Bazarov
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
G.I. Bell, J.R. Cary
Tech-X, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Y. Cai, Y.M. Nosochkov, A. Novokhatski, G. Stupakov, M.K. Sullivan, C.-Y. Tsai
SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
Z.A. Conway, M.P. Kelly, B. Mustapha, U. Wienands, A. Zholents
ANL, Lemont, Illinois, USA
S.U. De Silva, J.R. Delayen, H. Huang, C. Hyde, S. Sosa, B. Terzić
ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
K.E. Deitrick, G.H. Hoffstaetter
Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA
D. Douglas
Douglas Consulting, York, Virginia, USA
V.G. Dudnikov, R.P. Johnson
Muons, Inc, Illinois, USA
B. Erdelyi, P. Piot
Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
J.D. Fox
Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
J. Gerity, T.L. Mann, P.M. McIntyre, N. Pogue, A. Sattarov
Texas A&M University, College Station, USA
E. Gianfelice-Wendt, S. Nagaitsev
Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
Y. Hao, P.N. Ostroumov, A.S. Plastun, R.C. York
FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
T. Mastoridis
CalPoly, San Luis Obispo, California, USA
J.D. Maxwell, R. Milner, M. Musgrave
MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
J. Qiang, G.L. Sabbi
LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
D. Teytelman
Dimtel, Redwood City, California, USA
R.C. York
NSCL, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

With the completion of the National Academies of Sciences Assessment of a US Electron-Ion Collider, the prospects for construction of such a facility have taken a step forward. This paper provides an overview of the two site-specific EIC designs: JLEIC (Jefferson Lab) and eRHIC (BNL) as well as brief overview of ongoing EIC R&D.

Slides MOOHC2 [14.774 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOOHC2

About •

paper received ※ 29 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 04 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

MOYBA4

eRHIC Design Update

18

TUPLO11

use link to see paper's listing under its alternate paper code

C. Montag, G. Bassi, J. Beebe-Wang, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Blednykh, J.M. Brennan, S.J. Brooks, K.A. Brown, K.A. Drees, A.V. Fedotov, W. Fischer, D.M. Gassner, Y. Hao, A. Hershcovitch, C. Hetzel, D. Holmes, H. Huang, W.A. Jackson, J. Kewisch, Y. Li, C. Liu, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, F. Méot, M.G. Minty, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, S. Peggs, V. Ptitsyn, V.H. Ranjbar, G. Robert-Demolaize, S. Seletskiy, V.V. Smaluk, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, P. Thieberger, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S. Verdú-Andrés, W.-T. Weng, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu, W. Xu, A. Zaltsman, W. Zhang
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
Y. Cai, Y.M. Nosochkov
SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
E. Gianfelice-Wendt
Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA

Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
The future electron-ion collider (EIC) aims at an electron-proton luminosity of 10³³ to 10³⁴ cm^-2 sec^-1 and a center-of-mass energy range from 20 to 140 GeV. The eRHIC design has been continuously evolving over a couple of years and has reached a considerable level of maturity. The concept is generally conservative with very few risk items which are mitigated in various ways.

Slides MOYBA4 [5.466 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOYBA4

About •

paper received ※ 24 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 31 August 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUZBA2

Electron Ion Collider Machine Detector Interface

335

B. Parker, E.C. Aschenauer, A. Kiselev, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
M. Diefenthaler, Y. Furletova, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, D. Romanov, A. Seryi, R. Yoshida
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
C. Hyde
ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
M.K. Sullivan
SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA

This presentation summarizes the physics requirements as they translate into accelerator requirements at the machine-detector interface. Unique aspects of the Interaction Region and detector acceptance – unique to an Electron Ion Collider – are summarized. Designs of both site-specific concepts are outlined.

Slides TUZBA2 [13.525 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-TUZBA2

About •

paper received ※ 29 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 05 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPLO06

Weak-Strong Beam-Beam Simulation for eRHIC

545

Y. Luo, G. Bassi, M. Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, C. Montag, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
Y. Hao, D. Xu
FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
J. Qiang
LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA

Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
In the eRHIC, to compensate the geometric luminosity loss due to the crossing angle, crab cavities are to be installed on both sides of the interaction point. When the proton bunch length is comparable to the wavelength of its crab cavities, protons will not be perfectly tilted in the x-z plane. In the article, we employ weak-strong beam-beam interaction model to calculate the proton beam size growth rates and luminosity degradation rate with various machine and time parameters. The goal of these studies is to optimize the the beam-beam related machine and beam parameters of eRHIC.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-TUPLO06

About •

paper received ※ 29 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 03 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

TUPLO07

Calculation of Action Diffusion With Crabbed Collision in eRHIC

549

Y. Luo, G. Bassi, M. Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, C. Montag, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke
BNL, Upton, New York, USA
Y. Hao, D. Xu
FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
J. Qiang
LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA

Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
In the eRHIC, to compensate the geometric luminosity loss due to the crossing angle, crab cavities are to be installed on both sides of the interaction point. When the proton bunch length is comparable to the wavelength of its crab cavities, protons will not be perfectly tilted in the x-z plane. In the article, we develop a simulation code to calculate the transverse action diffusion rate as function of the initial proton longitudinal action. The goal of this study is to identify the contributions from various protons to the overall emittance growth. Tune scan is also performed to locate optimum working points which yield less proton emittance growth.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-TUPLO07

About •

paper received ※ 29 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 03 September 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)