SRF2021 - List of Authors (Fischer, J.F.)

Paper	Title	Page
MOPCAV001	Cavity Production and Testing of the First C75 Cryomodule for CEBAF	250
	G. Ciovati, G. Cheng, E. Daly, G.K. Davis, M.A. Drury, J.F. Fischer, D. Forehand, K. Macha, F. Marhauser, E.A. McEwen, A.L.A. Mitchell, A.V. Reilly, R.A. Rimmer, S. Wang JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
	Funding: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics under contract DE-AC05-06OR23177. The CEBAF cryomodule rework program was updated over the last few years to increase the energy gain of refurbished cryomodules to 75 MeV. The concept recycles the waveguide end-groups from original CEBAF cavities fabricated in the 1990s and replaces the five elliptical cells in each with a new optimized cell shape fabricated from large-grain, ingot Nb material. Eight cavities were fabricated at Research Instruments, Germany, and two cavities were built at Jefferson Lab. Each cavity was processed by electropolishing and tested at 2.07 K. The best eight cavities were assembled into ’cavity pairs’ and re-tested at 2.07 K, before assembly into the cryomodule. All but one cavity in the cryomodule were within 10% of the target accelerating gradient of 19 MV/m with a quality factor of 8·10⁹. The performance limitations were field emission and multipacting.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-SRF2021-MOPCAV001
About •	Received ※ 17 June 2021 — Accepted ※ 21 February 2022 — Issue date ※ 10 April 2022
Cite •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

MOPCAV005	Status of SNS Proton Power Upgrade SRF Cavities Production Qualification	265
	P. Dhakal, E. Daly, G.K. Davis, J.F. Fischer, D. Forehand, N.A. Huque, A.L.A. Mitchell, P.D. Owen JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA M.P. Howell, S.-H. Kim, J.D. Mammosser ORNL, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
	The Proton Power Upgrade project at Oak Ridge National Lab’s Spallation Neutron Source (SNS PPU) currently being constructed will double the proton beam power from 1.4 to 2.8 MW by adding 7 additional cryomodules, each contains four six-cell high beta (\beta = 0.81) superconducting radio frequency cavities. The cavities were built by Research Instruments, Germany, with all the cavity processing done at the vendor site, including electropolishing as the final active chemistry step. All 28 cavities needed for 7 cryomodules were delivered to Jefferson Lab, ready to be tested. The cryogenic RF qualifications and helium vessel welding were done at Jefferson Lab. The performance largely exceed the requirements, and greatly exceeded the performance of the original SNS cavity production series. Here, we present the summary of RF test on production cavities to this date. This manuscript has been authored by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under U.S. DOE Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177.
	Poster MOPCAV005 [1.065 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-SRF2021-MOPCAV005
About •	Received ※ 19 June 2021 — Revised ※ 10 July 2021 — Accepted ※ 12 March 2022 — Issue date ※ 06 April 2022
Cite •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

Paper

Title

Page

Cavity Production and Testing of the First C75 Cryomodule for CEBAF

250

G. Ciovati, G. Cheng, E. Daly, G.K. Davis, M.A. Drury, J.F. Fischer, D. Forehand, K. Macha, F. Marhauser, E.A. McEwen, A.L.A. Mitchell, A.V. Reilly, R.A. Rimmer, S. Wang
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA

Funding: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics under contract DE-AC05-06OR23177.
The CEBAF cryomodule rework program was updated over the last few years to increase the energy gain of refurbished cryomodules to 75 MeV. The concept recycles the waveguide end-groups from original CEBAF cavities fabricated in the 1990s and replaces the five elliptical cells in each with a new optimized cell shape fabricated from large-grain, ingot Nb material. Eight cavities were fabricated at Research Instruments, Germany, and two cavities were built at Jefferson Lab. Each cavity was processed by electropolishing and tested at 2.07 K. The best eight cavities were assembled into ’cavity pairs’ and re-tested at 2.07 K, before assembly into the cryomodule. All but one cavity in the cryomodule were within 10% of the target accelerating gradient of 19 MV/m with a quality factor of 8·10⁹. The performance limitations were field emission and multipacting.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-SRF2021-MOPCAV001

About •

Received ※ 17 June 2021 — Accepted ※ 21 February 2022 — Issue date ※ 10 April 2022

Cite •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

MOPCAV005

Status of SNS Proton Power Upgrade SRF Cavities Production Qualification

265

P. Dhakal, E. Daly, G.K. Davis, J.F. Fischer, D. Forehand, N.A. Huque, A.L.A. Mitchell, P.D. Owen
JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
M.P. Howell, S.-H. Kim, J.D. Mammosser
ORNL, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA

The Proton Power Upgrade project at Oak Ridge National Lab’s Spallation Neutron Source (SNS PPU) currently being constructed will double the proton beam power from 1.4 to 2.8 MW by adding 7 additional cryomodules, each contains four six-cell high beta (\beta = 0.81) superconducting radio frequency cavities. The cavities were built by Research Instruments, Germany, with all the cavity processing done at the vendor site, including electropolishing as the final active chemistry step. All 28 cavities needed for 7 cryomodules were delivered to Jefferson Lab, ready to be tested. The cryogenic RF qualifications and helium vessel welding were done at Jefferson Lab. The performance largely exceed the requirements, and greatly exceeded the performance of the original SNS cavity production series. Here, we present the summary of RF test on production cavities to this date.
This manuscript has been authored by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under U.S. DOE Contract No. DE-AC05-06OR23177.

Poster MOPCAV005 [1.065 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ doi:10.18429/JACoW-SRF2021-MOPCAV005

About •

Received ※ 19 June 2021 — Revised ※ 10 July 2021 — Accepted ※ 12 March 2022 — Issue date ※ 06 April 2022

Cite •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)