NAPAC2019 - List of Keywords (multipactoring)

Paper	Title	Other Keywords	Page
MOYBB4	Large-Scale Dewar Testing of FRIB Production Cavities: Statistical Analysis	cavity, SRF, linac, cryomodule	41
	C. Zhang, W. Chang, W. Hartung, S.H. Kim, J.T. Popielarski, K. Saito, J.F. Schwartz, T. Xu FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
	The Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) requires a driver linac with 324 superconducting cavities to deliver ion beams at 200 MeV per nucleon. About 1/3 of the cavities are quarter-wave resonators (QWRs, 805. MHz); the rest are half-wave resonators (HWRs, 322 MHz). FRIB cavity production is nearly complete, with more than 90% of the required cavities certified for installation into cryomodules (as of May 2019). We have accumulated a large data set on performance of production QWRs and HWRs during Dewar certificating testing of jacketed cavities. In this paper, we will report on the data analysis, including statistics on the BCS resistance, residual resistance, energy gap, and Q-slope. Additionally, we will discuss performance limitations and conditioning (multipacting, field emission).
	Slides MOYBB4 [1.200 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOYBB4
About •	paper received ※ 01 September 2019 paper accepted ※ 19 November 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

WEPLM13	Multipactor Electron Cloud Analysis in a 17 GHz Standing Wave Accelerator Cavity	electron, cavity, simulation, experiment	687
	H. Xu, M.A. Shapiro, R.J. Temkin MIT/PSFC, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
	Funding: US Department of Energy High Energy Physics Theoretical predictions of single-surface one-point multipactor modes have been confirmed in experiments with a 17 GHz standing wave single cell disk-loaded waveguide accelerator structure operated in gradient range of 45-90 MV/m. A dc-biased probe placed outside of a slit in the side wall of the structure was used to measure the internal dark current electron energy distribution. The results indicated that the electrons had kinetic energy up to about 50 eV, in agreement with our CST particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations. Further theoretical calculations were performed to calculate the frequency detuning introduced by the multipactor electron cloud on the cell side wall for different electron cloud thicknesses and densities. We found that the detuning (Δf/f) due to the electron cloud was small, about two orders of magnitude smaller than the reciprocal of the cavity loaded quality factor. This detuning is sufficiently small that it does not cause significant power reflection. Similar calculations were carried out for high gradient operation of accelerator structures at frequencies of 2.856 GHz and 110.0 GHz, showing similar small detuning by multipactor discharges.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-WEPLM13
About •	paper received ※ 19 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 16 November 2020 issue date ※ 08 October 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

Paper

Title

Other Keywords

Page

MOYBB4

Large-Scale Dewar Testing of FRIB Production Cavities: Statistical Analysis

cavity, SRF, linac, cryomodule

41

C. Zhang, W. Chang, W. Hartung, S.H. Kim, J.T. Popielarski, K. Saito, J.F. Schwartz, T. Xu
FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

The Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) requires a driver linac with 324 superconducting cavities to deliver ion beams at 200 MeV per nucleon. About 1/3 of the cavities are quarter-wave resonators (QWRs, 805. MHz); the rest are half-wave resonators (HWRs, 322 MHz). FRIB cavity production is nearly complete, with more than 90% of the required cavities certified for installation into cryomodules (as of May 2019). We have accumulated a large data set on performance of production QWRs and HWRs during Dewar certificating testing of jacketed cavities. In this paper, we will report on the data analysis, including statistics on the BCS resistance, residual resistance, energy gap, and Q-slope. Additionally, we will discuss performance limitations and conditioning (multipacting, field emission).

Slides MOYBB4 [1.200 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOYBB4

About •

paper received ※ 01 September 2019 paper accepted ※ 19 November 2019 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

WEPLM13

Multipactor Electron Cloud Analysis in a 17 GHz Standing Wave Accelerator Cavity

electron, cavity, simulation, experiment

687

H. Xu, M.A. Shapiro, R.J. Temkin
MIT/PSFC, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

Funding: US Department of Energy High Energy Physics
Theoretical predictions of single-surface one-point multipactor modes have been confirmed in experiments with a 17 GHz standing wave single cell disk-loaded waveguide accelerator structure operated in gradient range of 45-90 MV/m. A dc-biased probe placed outside of a slit in the side wall of the structure was used to measure the internal dark current electron energy distribution. The results indicated that the electrons had kinetic energy up to about 50 eV, in agreement with our CST particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations. Further theoretical calculations were performed to calculate the frequency detuning introduced by the multipactor electron cloud on the cell side wall for different electron cloud thicknesses and densities. We found that the detuning (Δf/f) due to the electron cloud was small, about two orders of magnitude smaller than the reciprocal of the cavity loaded quality factor. This detuning is sufficiently small that it does not cause significant power reflection. Similar calculations were carried out for high gradient operation of accelerator structures at frequencies of 2.856 GHz and 110.0 GHz, showing similar small detuning by multipactor discharges.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-WEPLM13

About •

paper received ※ 19 August 2019 paper accepted ※ 16 November 2020 issue date ※ 08 October 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)