Michael Simon (Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH)
TUPS10
Concluding the operation and development of COSY
1653
The operation of the COler SYnchrotron COSY and its further development ended in October 2023. We briefly review the operation of the accelerator facility and continuous development of its sub-systems. Additionally, this work is put in context of the transformation process that COSY operation and the Institute of Nuclear Physics (IKP) of the Research Center Jülich went through starting 2015. Furthermore, the decommissioning strategy along with the possible further use of COSY components are discussed.
  • V. Kamerdzhiev, A. Halama, B. Breitkreutz, J. Hetzel, K. Grigoryev, N. Shurkhno, P. Niedermayer, R. Gebel, Y. Valdau
    GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH
  • C. Boehme, C. Deliege, I. Bekman, K. Reimers, M. Simon, M. Thelen, N. Bongers, O. Felden, R. Stassen
    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
Paper: TUPS10
DOI: reference for this paper: 10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2024-TUPS10
About:  Received: 20 May 2024 — Revised: 23 May 2024 — Accepted: 23 May 2024 — Issue date: 01 Jul 2024
Cite: reference for this paper using: BibTeX, LaTeX, Text/Word, RIS, EndNote
WEPR60
Algorithmic access to beam control and beam diagnostics at COSY Jülich
2638
During the last years of operation of the COSY facility, significant improvements were made in beam control and diagnostics. Many systems have been upgraded from a Tcl/Tk based control system to EPICS. One of the advantages of EPICS is the coherent communication via Process Variables (PVs). This allowed us not only to control the synchrotron and its injection beam line (IBL) through GUIs but also allowed us to control the beam with algorithms. In our case, these algorithms covered a range of applications from variation of the currents of the electromagnets up to more advanced techniques of AI/ML such as Bayesian Optimization or beam control with Reinforcement Learning. Due to the unified nature of the PVs, the algorithms can be fed with a plethora of input parameters such as beam positions, beam current, or even live images of a camera. Depending on the algorithm, it is also possible to switch the target quantity (e.g. from measured current at the beam cups to the intensity of the injected beam at COSY). The algorithms can also trigger model calculations and access their results, if desired. We present an overview of different applications and our efforts to prepare COSY for them.
  • J. Hetzel, A. Awal, R. Gebel, V. Kamerdzhiev
    GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH
  • C. Deliege, I. Bekman, M. Simon, M. Thelen
    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
  • J. Pretz
    Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule
  • R. Modic, Z. Oven
    Cosylab
Paper: WEPR60
DOI: reference for this paper: 10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2024-WEPR60
About:  Received: 15 May 2024 — Revised: 19 May 2024 — Accepted: 19 May 2024 — Issue date: 01 Jul 2024
Cite: reference for this paper using: BibTeX, LaTeX, Text/Word, RIS, EndNote