Alharthi Fahad
MOPL086
On positron beam dynamics an initial part of a large aperture FCC-ee capture linac
760
The application of HTS coils as a matching device and a large-aperture L-band linac make it possible to transport a substantial part of positrons generated in a positron production target through a capture linac. It raises a question of how to manage their large phase space to provide bunches matched to the damping ring acceptance. This paper presents the beam dynamics studies of the FCC-ee positron linac consisting of an adiabatic matching device (AMD) with theoretical field distribution combined with constant solenoidal field along $\frac{9}{10}\pi$ large aperture L-band accelerating sections. AMD field drop rate, as well as the RF field phase and accelerating section length, were varied to find features of a bunch formation. It was shown that 5D normalized beam brightness is a useful parameter to optimize the initial part of the capture linac. A higher beam brightness can be obtained for the higher AMD field drop rate. Starting from some accelerating section length, two peak structure appears in the normalized brightness dependence on the RF field phase. The peaks correspond to the acceleration of the head or the tail of the initial positron longitudinal distribution. The last one provides a higher positron yield.
  • V. Mytrochenko, E. Bulyak
    National Science Centre
  • A. Bacci, M. Rossetti Conti
    Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
  • F. Alharthi, I. Chaikovska
    Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab
  • R. Chehab
    Laboratoire de Physique des 2 Infinis Irène Joliot-Curie
Paper: MOPL086
DOI: reference for this paper: 10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2023-MOPL086
About:  Received: 03 May 2023 — Revised: 12 May 2023 — Accepted: 23 Jun 2023 — Issue date: 26 Sep 2023
Cite: reference for this paper using: BibTeX, LaTeX, Text/Word, RIS, EndNote
MOPL094
Benchmarking the FCC-ee positron source simulation tools using the SuperKEKB results
772
For the Future Circular Collider (FCC-ee), particular attention is drowned to the crucial role of the positron source. Two positron production schemes are considered for the FCC-ee: conventional and crystal-based (hybrid), implying the use of channeling radiation in the oriented crystals. To design and optimize the positron production and capture by considering the positron injector parameters, including the electron drive beam and the final system acceptance, a start-to-end simulation toolkit should be developed. This paper will present the first results of benchmarking the FCC-ee positron source simulation tools using the SuperKEKB positron source currently in operation. The model starts with the production of positrons and target studies in Geant4. Then, a new tracking code RF-Track is used for capturing and tracking the generated positrons through the capture section composed of the matching device and several accelerating structures embedded in the solenoid field to accelerate the positrons until ~120 MeV. Afterward, the positrons are further accelerated to the energy of the Damping Ring (1.1 GeV).
  • F. Alharthi, I. Chaikovska
    Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab
  • A. Latina
    European Organization for Nuclear Research
  • F. Miyahara, Y. Enomoto
    High Energy Accelerator Research Organization
  • R. Chehab
    Laboratoire de Physique des 2 Infinis Irène Joliot-Curie
  • V. Mytrochenko
    National Science Centre
  • Y. Zhao
    Shandong University
Paper: MOPL094
DOI: reference for this paper: 10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2023-MOPL094
About:  Received: 04 May 2023 — Revised: 22 May 2023 — Accepted: 22 May 2023 — Issue date: 26 Sep 2023
Cite: reference for this paper using: BibTeX, LaTeX, Text/Word, RIS, EndNote
MOPL095
Update on the FCC-ee positron source design studies
776
The studies and R&D on the high-intensity positron source for the FCC-ee have been initiated for a while. The positrons are produced by a 6 GeV electron drive-beam incident on a target-converter at 200 Hz. The drive beam comes in 2 bunches spaced by 25 ns with a maximum charge of ~5 nC per bunch. Two scenarios using conventional and hybrid targets are being studied for positron production. According to the FCC CDR, the Flux Concentrator is used as the matching device for the capture system, followed by several accelerating structures embedded in the solenoidal field. Then, the positrons are further accelerated to be injected into the damping ring. Recently, the feasibility study on using a SC solenoid for the positron capture has been started, and the design based on the HTS technology is under investigation. In addition, the large aperture 2 GHz RF structures, which have been specially designed for the FCC-ee positron capture system, are used with the goal of demonstrating accepted positron yield values well beyond the values obtained with state-of-the-art positron sources. The purpose of this paper is to review the current status of the FCC-ee positron source design, highlighting the recent research into the positron production, capture system, primary acceleration, and injection into the damping ring.
  • I. Chaikovska, F. Alharthi
    Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab
  • A. Bacci, M. Rossetti Conti
    Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
  • A. Latina, A. Lechner, A. Perillo Marcone, J. Grenard, R. Mena Andrade
    European Organization for Nuclear Research
  • B. Humann
    Vienna University of Technology
  • B. Auchmann, J. Kosse, P. Craievich, R. Zennaro
    Paul Scherrer Institut
  • M. Schaer
    Paul Scherrer Institute
  • M. Duda
    Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences
  • P. Martyshkin
    Russian Academy of Sciences
  • R. Chehab
    Laboratoire de Physique des 2 Infinis Irène Joliot-Curie
  • V. Mytrochenko
    National Science Centre
  • Y. Zhao
    Shandong University
  • Y. Enomoto
    High Energy Accelerator Research Organization
Paper: MOPL095
DOI: reference for this paper: 10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2023-MOPL095
About:  Received: 05 May 2023 — Revised: 05 Jun 2023 — Accepted: 05 Jun 2023 — Issue date: 26 Sep 2023
Cite: reference for this paper using: BibTeX, LaTeX, Text/Word, RIS, EndNote
TUPA085
Study and optimization of an hybrid crystal-based positron source for the FCC-ee
A crystal-based hybrid e+ source could be a good alternative to conventional sources based on the e- conversion into e+ in a thick target and is currently under consideration for the FCC-ee [1]. In a hybrid source an e- beam crosses a thin oriented crystal with emission of channeling radiation, featuring enhanced photon flux w.r.t. Bremsstrahlung [2]. It results in an increase in the number of e+ produced at the converter target positioned after the crystal. This allows to reduce the converter thickness and decrease the deposited energy and Peak Energy Deposition Density (PEDD) in it. Here we present the optimization of the hybrid source for the FCC-ee case performed via Geant4; a W crystal was selected as radiator and different configurations were considered; with/without collimators or with/without a sweeping magnet between the crystal radiator and the converter target. In all these cases, a huge reduction of PEDD in the converter was shown. The Geant4 model was benchmarked with experimental tests at DESY TB with 6 GeV electrons [3] and CERN PS&SPS with 6 and 20 GeV e-beams. The tests were performed for either the W crystal and other alternative crystals, e.g., diamond or Ir. The simulation tool is now ready for more sophisticated simulation of the full chain of the injection system. References [1] I. Chaikovska et al 2022 JINST 17 P05015 [2] R. Chehab, V. Strakhovenko and A. Variola, NIM B 266 (2008) 3868 [3] L. Bandiera et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 699
  • L. Bandiera, A. Sytov, A. Mazzolari, G. Paternò, G. Cavoto, M. Soldani, R. Negrello, V. Guidi
    Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
  • A. Selmi, G. Lezzani, M. Prest, P. Monti-Guarnieri, S. Mangiacavalli, S. Carsi
    Università dell'Insubria & INFN Milano Bicocca
  • D. De Salvador, F. Sgarbossa
    Univ. degli Studi di Padova
  • E. Vallazza
    Istituto Nazionale Fisica Nucleare, Trieste
  • F. Alharthi, I. Chaikovska
    Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab
  • L. Bomben, V. Mascagna
    Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca
  • M. Romagnoni
    Universita' degli Studi di Milano
  • R. Chehab
    Laboratoire de Physique des 2 Infinis Irène Joliot-Curie
  • V. Tikhomirov
    Belarussian State University
  • V. Haurylavets
    Institute for Nuclear Problems of Belarusian State University
  • V. Mytrochenko
    National Science Centre
Cite: reference for this paper using: BibTeX, LaTeX, Text/Word, RIS, EndNote