IPAC2019 - List of Authors (Arsenyev, S.)

Paper	Title	Page
MOPMP037	Updated High-Energy LHC Design	524
	F. Zimmermann, D. Amorim, S.A. Antipov, S. Arsenyev, M. Benedikt, R. Bruce, M.P. Crouch, S.D. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, B. Goddard, M. Hofer, J. Keintzel, R. Kersevan, V. Mertens, J. Molson, Y. Muttoni, J.A. Osborne, V. Parma, V. Raginel, S. Redaelli, T. Risselada, I. Ruehl, B. Salvant, D. Schoerling, E.N. Shaposhnikova, L.J. Tavian, E. Todesco, R. Tomás, D. Tommasini, F. Valchkova-Georgieva, V. Venturi, D. Wollmann CERN, Geneva, Switzerland J.L. Abelleira, A. Abramov, E. Cruz Alaniz, H. Pikhartova, A. Seryi, L. van Riesen-Haupt JAI, Oxford, United Kingdom A. Apyan ANSL, Yerevan, Armenia J. Barranco García, L. Mether, T. Pieloni, L. Rivkin, C. Tambasco EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland F. Burkart DESY, Hamburg, Germany Y. Cai, Y.M. Nosochkov SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA G. Guillermo Cantón CINVESTAV, Mérida, Mexico K. Ohmi, K. Oide, D. Zhou KEK, Ibaraki, Japan
	Funding: This work was supported in part by the European Commission under the HORIZON 2020 project ARIES no.730871, and by the Swiss Accelerator Research and Technology collaboration CHART. We present updated design parameters for a future High-Energy LHC. A more realistic turnaround time has led to a revision of the target peak luminosity, as well as a choice of a larger IP beta function, and longer physics fills. Pushed parameters of the Nb₃Sn superconducting cable together with a modified layout of the 16 T dipole magnets resulted in revised field errors, updated dynamic-aperture simulations, and an associated re-evaluation of injector options. Collimators in the dispersion suppressors help achieve satisfactory cleaning performance. Longitudinal beam parameters ensure beam stability throughout the cycle. Intrabeam scattering rates and Touschek lifetime appear benign.
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2019-MOPMP037
About •	paper received ※ 10 May 2019 paper accepted ※ 20 May 2019 issue date ※ 21 June 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

WEYPLS1	Building the Impedance Model of a Real Machine	2249
	B. Salvant, D. Amorim, S.A. Antipov, S. Arsenyev, M.S. Beck, N. Biancacci, O.S. Brüning, J.V. Campelo, E. Carideo, F. Caspers, A. Farricker, A. Grudiev, T. Kaltenbacher, E. Koukovini-Platia, P. Kramer, A. Lasheen, M. Migliorati, N. Mounet, E. Métral, N. Nasr Esfahani, S. Persichelli, B.K. Popovic, T.L. Rijoff, G. Rumolo, E.N. Shaposhnikova, V.G. Vaccaro, C. Vollinger, N. Wang, C. Zannini, B. Zotter CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland D. Amorim Grenoble-INP Phelma, Grenoble, France T. Dalascu EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland M. Migliorati Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy R. Nagaoka SOLEIL, Gif-sur-Yvette, France V.V. Smaluk BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York, USA B. Spataro INFN/LNF, Frascati, Italy N. Wang IHEP, Beijing, People’s Republic of China S.M. White ESRF, Grenoble, France
	A reliable impedance model of a particle accelerator can be built by combining the beam coupling impedances of all the components. This is a necessary step to be able to evaluate the machine performance limitations, identify the main contributors in case an impedance reduction is required, and study the interaction with other mechanisms such as optics nonlinearities, transverse damper, noise, space charge, electron cloud, beam-beam (in a collider). The main phases to create a realistic impedance model, and verify it experimentally, will be reviewed, highlighting the main challenges. Some examples will be presented revealing the levels of precision of machine impedance models that have been achieved.
	Slides WEYPLS1 [5.648 MB]
DOI •	reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2019-WEYPLS1
About •	paper received ※ 10 May 2019 paper accepted ※ 23 May 2019 issue date ※ 21 June 2019
Export •	reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

Paper

Title

Page

Updated High-Energy LHC Design

524

F. Zimmermann, D. Amorim, S.A. Antipov, S. Arsenyev, M. Benedikt, R. Bruce, M.P. Crouch, S.D. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, B. Goddard, M. Hofer, J. Keintzel, R. Kersevan, V. Mertens, J. Molson, Y. Muttoni, J.A. Osborne, V. Parma, V. Raginel, S. Redaelli, T. Risselada, I. Ruehl, B. Salvant, D. Schoerling, E.N. Shaposhnikova, L.J. Tavian, E. Todesco, R. Tomás, D. Tommasini, F. Valchkova-Georgieva, V. Venturi, D. Wollmann
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
J.L. Abelleira, A. Abramov, E. Cruz Alaniz, H. Pikhartova, A. Seryi, L. van Riesen-Haupt
JAI, Oxford, United Kingdom
A. Apyan
ANSL, Yerevan, Armenia
J. Barranco García, L. Mether, T. Pieloni, L. Rivkin, C. Tambasco
EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
F. Burkart
DESY, Hamburg, Germany
Y. Cai, Y.M. Nosochkov
SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
G. Guillermo Cantón
CINVESTAV, Mérida, Mexico
K. Ohmi, K. Oide, D. Zhou
KEK, Ibaraki, Japan

Funding: This work was supported in part by the European Commission under the HORIZON 2020 project ARIES no.730871, and by the Swiss Accelerator Research and Technology collaboration CHART.
We present updated design parameters for a future High-Energy LHC. A more realistic turnaround time has led to a revision of the target peak luminosity, as well as a choice of a larger IP beta function, and longer physics fills. Pushed parameters of the Nb₃Sn superconducting cable together with a modified layout of the 16 T dipole magnets resulted in revised field errors, updated dynamic-aperture simulations, and an associated re-evaluation of injector options. Collimators in the dispersion suppressors help achieve satisfactory cleaning performance. Longitudinal beam parameters ensure beam stability throughout the cycle. Intrabeam scattering rates and Touschek lifetime appear benign.

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2019-MOPMP037

About •

paper received ※ 10 May 2019 paper accepted ※ 20 May 2019 issue date ※ 21 June 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)

WEYPLS1

Building the Impedance Model of a Real Machine

2249

B. Salvant, D. Amorim, S.A. Antipov, S. Arsenyev, M.S. Beck, N. Biancacci, O.S. Brüning, J.V. Campelo, E. Carideo, F. Caspers, A. Farricker, A. Grudiev, T. Kaltenbacher, E. Koukovini-Platia, P. Kramer, A. Lasheen, M. Migliorati, N. Mounet, E. Métral, N. Nasr Esfahani, S. Persichelli, B.K. Popovic, T.L. Rijoff, G. Rumolo, E.N. Shaposhnikova, V.G. Vaccaro, C. Vollinger, N. Wang, C. Zannini, B. Zotter
CERN, Meyrin, Switzerland
D. Amorim
Grenoble-INP Phelma, Grenoble, France
T. Dalascu
EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
M. Migliorati
Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
R. Nagaoka
SOLEIL, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
V.V. Smaluk
BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York, USA
B. Spataro
INFN/LNF, Frascati, Italy
N. Wang
IHEP, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
S.M. White
ESRF, Grenoble, France

A reliable impedance model of a particle accelerator can be built by combining the beam coupling impedances of all the components. This is a necessary step to be able to evaluate the machine performance limitations, identify the main contributors in case an impedance reduction is required, and study the interaction with other mechanisms such as optics nonlinearities, transverse damper, noise, space charge, electron cloud, beam-beam (in a collider). The main phases to create a realistic impedance model, and verify it experimentally, will be reviewed, highlighting the main challenges. Some examples will be presented revealing the levels of precision of machine impedance models that have been achieved.

Slides WEYPLS1 [5.648 MB]

DOI •

reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2019-WEYPLS1

About •

paper received ※ 10 May 2019 paper accepted ※ 23 May 2019 issue date ※ 21 June 2019

Export •

reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)