Author: Li, H.T.
Paper Title Page
MOPOW026 Status of FELiCHEM, a New IR-FEL in China 774
 
  • H.T. Li, Z.G. He, Q.K. Jia, Q. Luo, L. Wang, S.C. Zhang
    USTC/NSRL, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China
 
  FELiChEM is a new experimental facility under construction at University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), whose core device is a FEL oscillator generating middle-infrared and far-infrared laser and covering the spectral range of 2.5-200 μm. It will be a dedicated light source aiming at energy chemistry research, with the photo excitation, photo dissociation and photo detection experimental stations. We present the brief physical and technical design that delivers the required performance for this device and summarize the status of fabrication. Final assembly is scheduled for early in the next year with first light targeted for July 2017.  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ DOI:10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2016-MOPOW026  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUPMB011 Calculation and Analysis of the Magnetic Field of a Transverse Gradient Undulator 1130
 
  • J. Li, B. Du, Q.K. Jia, H.T. Li
    USTC/NSRL, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China
 
  Transverse gradient undulator (TGU) is attracting more and more attentions, especially for the rapid progress of laser plasma accelerator techniques. The transverse gradient of TGU is usually given by an empirical formula simply derived from the empirical formula of a uniform-parameter undulator. In this paper, we numerically investigate the transverse magnetic field of TGUs using the RADIA code. Through many simulations for TGUs with different magnet structures, we have given the dependences of transverse gradient parameter on the cant angle, the undulator period and the average gap. Based on these results, when the cant angle is small and the rate of the gap and period is in the range of 0.4-0.6, the simulation results agree with the empirical formula well. But, with the growing of the cant angle, or with the growing of the deviation of the rate of the gap and period from the range of 0.4-0.6, the difference between the simulation results and the empirical formula becomes larger.  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ DOI:10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2016-TUPMB011  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)