Paper |
Title |
Page |
WEPS052 |
Progress of Linear Injector for SSC at HIRFL |
2610 |
|
- Y. He, X. Du, L.P. Sun, Z.J. Wang, C. Xiao, Y.Q. Yang, Y.J. Yuan, X.H. Zhang, Z.L. Zhang
IMP, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
- J.E. Chen, S.L. Gao, G. Liu, Y.R. Lu, K. Zhu
PKU/IHIP, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- J. Wang
Lanzhou University of Technology, People's Republic of China
|
|
|
A heavy ion linear accelerator for Separate Sector Cyclotron (SSC) is constructing at Heavy Ion Research Facility at Lanzhou (HIRFL). It is a new injector for SSC to improve its output beam intensity of 2 times for Super Heavy Experiment (SHE) and 10 times for injection of Cooling Storage Ring (CSR) than old Cyclotron. It has a normal conducting linac at upstream of SSC and one superconducting cryomodule at downstream of SSC to shift beam energy. The designed current of the linac is 0.5 mA and output energy is 0.57 MeV/u and 1.02 MeV/u. Beam dynamic study and prototype fabrication are introduced in the paper.
|
|
|
WEPS053 |
The Conceptual Design of One of Injector II of ADS in China |
2613 |
|
- Y. He, H. Jia, C. Li, Y. Liu, Z.J. Wang, C. Xiao, Y. Yang, B. Zhang, H.W. Zhao
IMP, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
|
|
|
A 10mA / 50 MeV superconducting proton linac as the demo of an ADS driver is designing and constructing in China. One of 10 MeV segments and corresponding prototypes are designed and fabricating at Institute of Modern Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. It consists of 2.5 MeV RFQ and superconducting structure from 2.5 to 10 MeV. The conceptual design and development of prototype are introduced in the paper.
|
|
|
WEPS054 |
The Comparison of ADS Injector II with HWR Cavity and CH Cavity |
2616 |
|
- Z.J. Wang, Y. He
IMP, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
|
|
|
High current superconducting proton linac is being studied for Accelerator-driven System (ADS) Project hold by the Chinese Academic of Sciences (CAS). The injector II, which will accelerate proton beam from 2.1 MeV to 10 MeV, will be operated with superconducting cavity. At low energy part, there are two alternative choose, one is HWR cavity, the other is CH cavity. In this paper, the comparison of design with the two type cavities will be presented in view of beam dynamics.
|
|
|