Author: Maruta, T.
Paper Title Page
TUPC102 Measurement of Beam Loss Tracks by Scintillating Fibers at J-PARC Linac 1251
 
  • H. Sako, T. Maruta, A. Miura
    JAEA/J-PARC, Tokai-mura, Japan
 
  Highest beam loss in the J-PARC linac has been observed that the ACS (Annular-Coupled Structure linac) section. Since the observed beam loss is proportional to the residual gas pressure, the source of the beam loss is considered as H0 produced in an interaction of H beams with remnant gas. If this assumption is valid, H0 hits the beam duct and changes into H+ and escapes from the beam duct. We constructed scintillation fiber hodoscopes to detect H+s and eventually identify the particle species as H+. The hodoscopes are made of 4 planes of hodoscopes which consists of 16 scintillation fibers of 64mm long and with 4mmx4mm cross section. We installed the hodoscopes at the upstream part of the ACS section and measured beam loss. The results are shown in this paper.  
 
TUPC104 Beam Loss Detected by Scintillation Monitor 1257
 
  • A. Miura, K. Hasegawa, T. Maruta, N. Ouchi, H. Sako
    JAEA/J-PARC, Tokai-Mura, Naka-Gun, Ibaraki-Ken, Japan
  • Z. Igarashi, M. Ikegami, T. Miyao
    KEK, Ibaraki, Japan
 
  Ar gas proportional BLMs have measured the beam loss through operations, but they are also sensitive to background noise of X-ray emitted from RF cavities. We have tried to measure the beam loss using scintillation monitors which would bring more accurate beam loss measurements with suppression of X-ray noise. We measured beam loss using scintillation beam loss monitors. Because this scintillation BLM is sensitive for low energy gamma-rays and fast neutrons, small signals from X-rays would be also detected. As the measurement results, a good signal to noise ratio is observed for the scintillation monitor with quite low sensitivity to the background X-ray. And many single events are observed in the intermediate pulse bunch with about 600 ns as pulse width. In addition, because we fabricated the filter and integrated circuit, total amount of X-ray noise can become smaller. We obtained the good performances of scintillation BLM with small effect of X-ray noise. This monitor can be used for beam loss measurement and a knob for tuning. Furthermore, because the detail structure can be detected, this monitor could be employed for another diagnostic device.  
 
WEPS047 Beamloss Study at J-PARC Linac by using Geant4 Simulation 2595
 
  • T. Maruta
    JAEA/J-PARC, Tokai-mura, Japan
 
  Beamloss is one of the key issue for intense hadron beam accelerators. Most of case, origin of beamloss is scattering process between beam particle and residual gas inside vacuum duct. In the case of J-PARC Linac, H ions emitted from an Ion source are accelerated up to 181 MeV, then the beam is transported to RCS. The H ion is the system comprised from a proton and two electrons. If the H ion is scattered with residual gas, these one or two electrons are escaped, then H becomes H0 or H+(proton). H0 or H+ is uncontrollable and finally it goes to beam duct. This process is based on physics process, and Geant4 is matched to this kind of simulation study. I programmed SDTL (50 MeV) to L3BT (181 MeV) section at J-PARC Linac by using Geant4 code. I also wrote H and H0 library which makes it possible for Geant4 to simulate them. I will show the simulation results.  
 
WEPS048 Dependence of Beam Loss on Vacuum Pressure Level in J-PARC Linac 2598
 
  • G.H. Wei
    KEK/JAEA, Ibaraki-Ken, Japan
  • K. Hirano, T. Maruta, A. Miura
    JAEA/J-PARC, Tokai-mura, Japan
  • K. Ikegami
    J-PARC, KEK & JAEA, Ibaraki-ken, Japan
 
  In J-PARC linac, a 181-MeV negative hydrogen beam is supported to a succeeding 3-GeV synchrotron with normal operation power at 100-300 kW. During operation, a beam loss in the straight section of the beam transport line immediately after the linac exit is found. The residual radiation level reaches 0.3 mSv/h on the surface of the vacuum chamber several hours after the beam shutdown with the linac beam power of 12 kW. We suppose that the residual gas scattering of negative hydrogen ions generates neutral hydrogen atoms and they give rise to the beam loss by hitting the vacuum chamber wall. To confirm this speculation, the vacuum pressure level in the linac had been changed in order to find the dependence of the beam loss on it. After data analysis, we found the relationship between beam loss amplitude, which was attained from beam loss signal, and vacuum pressure was linear. Corresponding deduction and simulation has been down according to the residual gas components in linac chamber. In this paper, we present the experimental result and some simulations in this study.  
 
TUPC100 Longitudinal Beam Profile Measurement at J-PARC Separated Drift Tube Linac 1245
 
  • T. Maruta
    KEK/JAEA, Ibaraki-Ken, Japan
  • M. Ikegami
    KEK, Ibaraki, Japan
  • A. Miura, G.H. Wei
    JAEA/J-PARC, Tokai-Mura, Naka-Gun, Ibaraki-Ken, Japan
  • H. Sako
    JAEA, Ibaraki-ken, Japan
 
  We measured longitudinal beam profile at Separated Drift Tube Linac (SDTL) injection part by scanning beam transmission and beamloss at the downstream of SDTL section by changing SDTL injection phase. As the beam goes to acceptance edge, part of the beam which is out of acceptance isn't accelerate and finally it is lost by hitting to beam duct. Thus beam transmission shows sliced bunch shape by acceptance edge, it is possible to reconstruct the beam bunch shape. The result shows about 60% wider profile in both phi and E direction against to design.  
 
WEPS046 Longitudinal Beam Acceptance of J-PARC Drift Tube Linac 2592
 
  • T. Maruta
    KEK/JAEA, Ibaraki-Ken, Japan
  • M. Ikegami
    KEK, Ibaraki, Japan
  • A. Miura, G.H. Wei
    JAEA/J-PARC, Tokai-Mura, Naka-Gun, Ibaraki-Ken, Japan
  • H. Sako
    JAEA, Ibaraki-ken, Japan
 
  The longitudinal acceptance of the J-PARC Drift Tube Linac (DTL) was measured by synchronous phase scan method. The IMPACT simulation indicated DTL longitudinal acceptance is shrinked if the DTL tank level reduced, but beam energy finally acheved at the Linac is almost same as the case of nominal tank level. We measured the acceptance and confirmed the simulation is correct.