Paper |
Title |
Page |
WEPS018 |
The Proposed CERN Proton-Synchrotron Upgrade Program |
2520 |
|
- S.S. Gilardoni, S. Bart Pedersen, W. Bartmann, S. Bartolome, O.E. Berrig, C. Bertone, A. Blas, D. Bodart, J. Borburgh, R.J. Brown, A.C. Butterworth, M.C.L. Buzio, C. Carli, P. Chiggiato, H. Damerau, T. Dobers, R. Folch, R. Garoby, B. Goddard, M. Gourber-Pace, S. Hancock, M. Hourican, P. Le Roux, L.A. Lopez Hernandez, A. Masi, G. Metral, Y. Muttoni, E. Métral, M. Nonis, J. Pierlot, S. Pittet, C. Rossi, I. Ruehl, G. Rumolo, L. Sermeus, R.R. Steerenberg, M. Widorski
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
|
|
|
In the framework of the High-Luminosity LHC project, the CERN Proton Synchrotron would require a major upgrade to match the future beam parameters requested as pre-injector of the collider. The different beam dynamics issues, from space-charge limitations to longitudinal instabilities are discussed, as well as the proposed technical solutions to overcome them, covering the increase of the injection energy to RF related improvements.
|
|
|
WEPS020 |
Study of an Energy Upgrade of the CERN PS Booster |
2526 |
|
- K. Hanke, O. Aberle, M. E. Angoletta, W. Bartmann, S. Bartolome, C. Bertone, A. Blas, J. Borburgh, D. Bozzini, A.C. Butterworth, C. Carli, P. Dahlen, T. Dobers, A. Findlay, R. Folch, N. Gilbert, J. Hansen, T. Hermanns, S. Jensen, P. Le Roux, L.A. Lopez Hernandez, E. Mahner, A. Masi, B. Mikulec, Y. Muttoni, A. Newborough, D. Nisbet, M. Nonis, S. Olek, M.M. Paoluzzi, S. Pittet, B. Puccio, V. Raginel, I. Ruehl, J. Tan, B. Todd, W.J.M. Weterings, M. Widorski
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
|
|
|
CERN’s LHC injector chain will have to deliver beams with ultimate brilliance as the LHC is heading for increased luminosity in the coming years. In order to overcome bottlenecks in the injector chain, an increase of the beam transfer energy from the CERN Proton Synchrotron Booster (PSB) to the Proton Synchrotron (PS) has been investigated as a possible upgrade scenario. This paper gives an overview of the technical solutions and summarizes the conclusions of the feasibility study.
|
|
|