A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  

Linnecar, T. P.R.

Paper Title Page
MOPP124 Commissioning of the 400 MHz LHC RF System 847
 
  • E. Ciapala, L. Arnaudon, P. Baudrenghien, O. Brunner, A. Butterworth, T. P.R. Linnecar, P. Maesen, J. C. Molendijk, E. Montesinos, D. Valuch, F. Weierud
    CERN, Geneva
 
  The installation of the 400 MHz superconducting RF system in LHC is finished and commissioning is under way. The final RF system comprises four cryomodules each with four cavities in the LHC tunnel. Also underground in an adjacent cavern shielded from the main tunnel are the sixteen 300 kW klystron RF power sources with their high voltage bunkers, two Faraday cages containing RF feedback and beam control electronics, and racks containing all the slow controls. The system and the experience gained during commissioning will be described. In particular, results from conditioning the cavities and their movable main power couplers and the setting up of the low level RF feedbacks will be presented.  
TUPP059 Study of Controlled Longitudinal Emittance Blow-up for High Intensity LHC Beams in the CERN SPS 1676
 
  • G. Papotti, T. Bohl, T. P.R. Linnecar, E. N. Shaposhnikova, J. Tuckmantel
    CERN, Geneva
 
  Preventive longitudinal emittance blow-up, in addition to a fourth harmonic Landau damping RF system, is required to keep the LHC beam in the SPS stable up to extraction. The beam is blown-up in a controlled way during the acceleration ramp by using band-limited phase noise targeted to act inside the synchrotron frequency spread, which is itself modified both by the second RF system and by intensity effects (beam loading and others). For a high intensity beam these latter effects can lead to a non-uniform emittance blow-up and even loss of stability for certain bunches in the batch. In this paper we present studies of the emittance blow-up achieved with high intensity beams under different conditions of both RF and noise parameters.  
WEOAG01 Prospects for a Large Hadron Electron Collider (LHeC) at the LHC 1903
 
  • M. Klein
    Liverpool University, Science Faculty, Liverpool
  • H. Aksakal
    N. U, Nigde
  • F. Bordry, H.-H. Braun, O. S. Brüning, H. Burkhardt, R. Garoby, J. M. Jowett, T. P.R. Linnecar, K. H. Mess, J. A. Osborne, L. Rinolfi, D. Schulte, R. Tomas, J. Tuckmantel, F. Zimmermann, A. de Roeck
    CERN, Geneva
  • S. Chattopadhyay, J. B. Dainton
    Cockcroft Institute, Warrington, Cheshire
  • A. K. Ciftci
    Ankara University, Faculty of Sciences, Tandogan/Ankara
  • A. Eide
    EPFL, Lausanne
  • B. J. Holzer
    DESY, Hamburg
  • P. Newman
    Birmingham University, Birmingham
  • E. Perez
    CEA, Gif-sur-Yvette
  • S. Sultansoy
    TOBB ETU, Ankara
  • A. Vivoli
    LAL, Orsay
  • F. J. Willeke
    BNL, Upton, New York
 
  The LHeC collides a lepton beam with one of the intense, LHC, hadron beams. It achieves both e± interactions with quarks at the terascale, at eq masses in excess of 1 TeV, with a luminosity of about 1033 cm-2 s-1, and it also enables a sub-femtoscopic probe of hadronic matter at unprecedented chromodynamic energy density, at Bjorken-x values down to 10-6 in the deep inelastic scattering domain. The LHeC combines the LHC infrastructure with recent advances in radio-frequency, in linear acceleration and in other associated technologies, to enable two proposals for TeV ep collisions: a "ring-ring" option in which 7 TeV protons (and ions) collide with about 70 GeV electrons/positrons in a storage ring in the LHC tunnel and a "linac-ring" option based on an independent superconducting linear accelerator enabling single-pass collisions of electrons and positrons of up to about 140 GeV with an LHC hadron beam. Both options will be presented and compared. Steps are outlined for completing a Conceptual Design Review of the accelerator complex, beam delivery, luminosity, physics and implications for experiment, following declared support by ECFA and by CERN for a CDR.  
slides icon Slides  
WEPP052 A Storage Ring Based Option for the LHeC 2638
 
  • F. J. Willeke
    BNL, Upton, New York
  • F. Bordry, H.-H. Braun, O. S. Brüning, H. Burkhardt, J. M. Jowett, T. P.R. Linnecar, K. H. Mess, S. Myers, J. A. Osborne, F. Zimmermann
    CERN, Geneva
  • S. Chattopadhyay
    Cockcroft Institute, Warrington, Cheshire
  • J. B. Dainton, M. Klein
    Liverpool University, Science Faculty, Liverpool
  • B. J. Holzer
    DESY, Hamburg
 
  The LHeC aims at the generation of Hadron-Lepton collisions with center of mass energies in the TeV scale and luminosities of the order of 1033 cm-2 sec-1 by taking advantage of the existing LHC 7 TeV proton ring and adding a high energy electron accelerator. This paper presents technical considerations and potential parameter choices for such a machine and outlines some of the challenges arising when an electron storage ring based option, constructed within the existing infrastructure of the LHC, is chosen.  
WEPP154 Linac-LHC ep Collider Options 2847
 
  • F. Zimmermann, F. Bordry, H.-H. Braun, O. S. Brüning, H. Burkhardt, R. Garoby, T. P.R. Linnecar, K. H. Mess, J. A. Osborne, L. Rinolfi, D. Schulte, R. Tomas, J. Tuckmantel, A. de Roeck
    CERN, Geneva
  • H. Aksakal
    N. U, Nigde
  • S. Chattopadhyay
    Cockcroft Institute, Warrington, Cheshire
  • A. K. Ciftci
    Ankara University, Faculty of Sciences, Tandogan/Ankara
  • J. B. Dainton
    Liverpool University, Science Faculty, Liverpool
  • A. Eide
    EPFL, Lausanne
  • B. J. Holzer
    DESY, Hamburg
  • M. Klein
    University of Liverpool, Liverpool
  • S. Sultansoy
    TOBB ETU, Ankara
  • A. Vivoli
    LAL, Orsay
  • F. J. Willeke
    BNL, Upton, New York
 
  We describe various parameter scenarios for a ring-linac ep collider based on LHC and an independent s.c. electron linac. Luminosities of order 1032/cm2/s can be achieved with a standard ILC-like linac, operated either in pulsed or cw mode, with acceptable beam power. Reaching much higher luminosities, up to 1034/cm2/s and beyond, would require the use of two linacs and the implementation of energy recovery. Advantages and challenges of a ring-linac ep collider vis-a-vis an alternative ring-ring collider are discussed.