| Paper |
Title |
Page |
| MOPC005 |
The ARC-EN-CIEL Radiation Sources
|
73 |
| |
- M.-E. Couprie, M. Labat
CEA, Gif-sur-Yvette
- C. Benabderrahmane, O. V. Chubar, G. Lambert, A. Loulergue, O. Marcouillé
SOLEIL, Gif-sur-Yvette
- C. Bruni
LAL, Orsay
- L. Giannessi
ENEA C. R. Frascati, Frascati (Roma)
|
|
| |
The ARC-EN-CIEL project proposes a panoply of light sources for the scientific community on a 1 GeV superconducting LINAC (phase 2) on which two ERL loops (1 and 2 GeV) are added in phase 3. LEL1 (200-1.5 nm), LEL2 (10-0.5 nm) and LEL4 (2-0.2 nm) are three kHz High Gain Harmonic Generation Free Electron Laser sources seeded with the High order Harmonics generated in Gas, with 100-30 FWHM pulses. A collaboration, which has been set-up with the SCSS Prototype Accelerator in Japan for test this key concept of ARC-EN-CIEL, has led to the experimental demonstration of the seeding with HHG and the observation up the 7th non linear harmonic with a seed at 160 nm. Besides. LEL3 (40-8 nm) installed on the 1 GeV loop is a MHz FEL oscillator providing higher average power and brilliance. In addition, in vacuum undulator spontaneous emission source extend the spectral range above 10 keV and intense THz radiation is generated by edge radiation of bending magnets. Optimisations and light sources characteristics are described.
|
|
| WEPC048 |
Experimental Characterization of the Insertion Device Effects on Beam Dynamics at SOLEIL
|
2097 |
| |
- P. Brunelle, C. Benabderrahmane, F. Briquez, O. V. Chubar, O. Marcouillé, F. Marteau, A. Nadji, L. S. Nadolski
SOLEIL, Gif-sur-Yvette
|
|
| |
SOLEIL, the French 2.75 GeV third generation light source, has been delivering photons to beam lines in routine operation since January 2007. The storage ring is presently equipped with eleven insertion devices: 3 in-vacuum 20mm period undulators (U20), 1 Apple-II type 52mm period undulator (HU52), 3 Apple-II type 80mm period undulators (HU80), 3 electromagnetic 256mm period undulators (HU256) and 1 electromagnetic 640mm period 10m long undulator (HU640). Commissioning of insertion devices consists of characterizing all the effects on beam dynamics in terms of focussing, injection efficiency, beam lifetime and sensitivity to working point, and also in optimizing feedforward tables in order to compensate for closed orbit distortions during field variations (this last point is detailed in other papers). We will focus here on the significant effects observed with some undulators. Measurements, using electron beam, of the transverse variation of field integrals, were helpful to understand bad effects impacting the daily operation. The introduction of real magnetic characteristics in the lattice model is in progress in order to further optimize the working point.
|
|
| WEPC098 |
Development of Cryogenic Undulator CPMU at SOLEIL
|
2225 |
| |
- C. Benabderrahmane, P. Berteaud, N. Béchu, M.-E. Couprie, J.-M. Filhol, C. Herbeaux, C. A. Kitegi, J. L. Marlats, A. Mary, K. Tavakoli
SOLEIL, Gif-sur-Yvette
|
|
| |
On SOLEIL at 2.75 GeV, producing hard X rays requires short period and small gap in-vacuum hybrid permanent magnet undulators. Besides, higher achieved peak magnetic field can be while operating at cryogenic temperature Tc (around 140 K). When cooling down the permanent magnets, the remanence Br increases down to a certain temperature at which the process is limited by the appearance of the Spin Reorientation Transition phenomenon. The coercivity is also increased at Tc which improves significantly the resistance to radiation. R&D studies, aims at replacing SmCo by NdFeB permanent magnets whose Br of 1.4 T, could enable to increase at least by 30% the peak magnetic field at Tc. Unfortunately such magnet grade can’t be heated to high temperature without degrading the magnetic properties, which limits the residual pressure that can be achieved. Temperature gradient and mechanical deformation are also technical issues. Different permanent magnet grades at Tc are characterized. Studies are also carried out on a small assembly of four periods. Residual pressures obtained with or without partial baking on standard U20 in-vacuum undulators are compared.
|
|