A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z    

Pivi, M.T.F.

Paper Title Page
TUPLS003 A Perfect Electrode to Suppress Secondary Electrons inside the Magnets 1489
 
  • L. Wang, M.T.F. Pivi
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
  • H. Fukuma, S.-I. Kurokawa
    KEK, Ibaraki
  • G.X. Xia
    DESY, Hamburg
 
  Electron cloud due to multipacting in the positron ring of B-factories is one of the limitations on the machine performance. Electron cloud in the drift region can be suppressed by solenoid. However, solenoid doesn't work inside a magnet. Numerical studies show that there is strong multipacting in the dipole magnet of the B-factory positron ring. Electrons also can be trapped inside quadrupole and sextupole magnets. The electron cloud from the dipole magnet and wiggler in the positron damping ring of the ILC is a critical limitation on the choice of damping ring circumference, which directly results in a choice of two 6km rings as the baseline for the positron damping ring. Various electrodes have been studied using the program CLOUDLAND. Our studies show that a wire type of electrode with a few hundred voltages works perfectly to kill the secondary electrons inside various magnets.  
THPCH075 Simulation of the Electron Cloud for Various Configurations of a Damping Ring for the ILC 2958
 
  • M.T.F. Pivi, T.O. Raubenheimer, L. Wang
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
  • K. Ohmi
    KEK, Ibaraki
  • R. Wanzenberg
    DESY, Hamburg
  • A. Wolski
    Liverpool University, Science Faculty, Liverpool
  • F. Zimmermann
    CERN, Geneva
 
  In the beam pipe of the Damping Ring (DR) of the International Linear Collider (ILC), an electron cloud may be first produced by photoelectrons and ionization of residual gasses and then increased by the secondary emission process. This paper reports about the work that has been done by the electron cloud assessment international task force group for the recommendation of the ILC Damping Rings baseline design, made in November 2005. We have carefully estimated the secondary electron yield (SEY) threshold for electron cloud build-up and estimated the related single- and coupled-bunch instabilities that can be caused by the presence of electron cloud as a function of beam current and surface properties, for a variety of optics designs. The result of these studies was an important consideration in the choice of a 6-km design for the ILC damping rings. On the basis of the theoretical and experimental work, the baseline configuration specifies a pair of damping rings for the positron beam to mitigate the effects of the electron cloud.  
MOPLS045 Achieving a Luminosity of 1034/cm2/s in the PEP-II B-factory 643
 
  • J. Seeman, J. Browne, Y. Cai, W.S. Colocho, F.-J. Decker, M.H. Donald, S. Ecklund, R.A. Erickson, A.S. Fisher, J.D. Fox, S.A. Heifets, R.H. Iverson, A. Kulikov, A. Novokhatski, V. Pacak, M.T.F. Pivi, C.H. Rivetta, M.C. Ross, P. Schuh, K.G. Sonnad, M. Stanek, M.K. Sullivan, P. Tenenbaum, D. Teytelman, J.L. Turner, D. Van Winkle, M. Weaver, U. Wienands, W. Wittmer, M. Woodley, Y.T. Yan, G. Yocky
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
  • M.E. Biagini
    INFN/LNF, Frascati (Roma)
  • W. Kozanecki
    CEA, Gif-sur-Yvette
 
  For the PEP-II Operation Staff: PEP-II is an asymmetric e+e- collider operating at the Upsilon 4S and has recently set several performance records. The luminosity has exceeded 1x1034/cm2/s and has delivered an integrated luminosity of 728/pb in one day. PEP-II operates in continuous injection mode for both beams, boosting the integrated luminosity. The peak positron current has reached 2.94 A and 1.74 A of electrons in 1732 bunches. The total integrated luminosity since turn on in 1999 has reached over 333/fb. This paper reviews the present performance issues of PEP-II and also the planned increase of luminosity in the near future to over 2 x 1034/cm2/s. Upgrade details and plans are discussed.  
MOPLS067 Test Beam Studies at SLAC's End Station A, for the International Linear Collider 700
 
  • M. Woods, C. Adolphsen, R. Arnold, G.B. Bowden, G.R. Bower, R.A. Erickson, H. Fieguth, J.C. Frisch, C. Hast, R.H. Iverson, Z. Li, T.W. Markiewicz, D.J. McCormick, S. Molloy, J. Nelson, M.T.F. Pivi, M.C. Ross, S. Seletskiy, A. Seryi, S. Smith, Z. Szalata, P. Tenenbaum
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
  • D. Adey, M.C. Stockton, N.K. Watson
    Birmingham University, Birmingham
  • M. Albrecht, M.H. Hildreth
    Notre Dame University, Notre Dame, Iowa
  • W.W.M. Allison, V. Blackmore, P. Burrows, G.B. Christian, C.C. Clarke, G. Doucas, A.F. Hartin, B. Ottewell, C. Perry, C. Swinson, G.R. White
    OXFORDphysics, Oxford, Oxon
  • D.A.-K. Angal-Kalinin, C.D. Beard, J.L. Fernandez-Hernando, F. Jackson, A. Kalinin
    CCLRC/DL/ASTeC, Daresbury, Warrington, Cheshire
  • R.J. Barlow, A. Bungau, G.Yu. Kourevlev, A. Mercer
    UMAN, Manchester
  • S.T. Boogert
    Royal Holloway, University of London, Surrey
  • D.A. Burton, J.D.A. Smith, R. Tucker
    Lancaster University, Lancaster
  • W.E. Chickering, C.T. Hlaing, O.N. Khainovski, Y.K. Kolomensky, T. Orimoto
    UCB, Berkeley, California
  • C. Densham, R.J.S. Greenhalgh
    CCLRC/DL, Daresbury, Warrington, Cheshire
  • V. Duginov, S.A. Kostromin, N.A. Morozov
    JINR, Dubna, Moscow Region
  • G. Ellwood, P.G. Huggard, J. O'Dell
    CCLRC/RAL, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon
  • F. Gournaris, A. Lyapin, B. Maiheu, S. Malton, D.J. Miller, M.W. Wing
    UCL, London
  • M.B. Johnston
    University of Oxford, Clarendon Laboratory, Oxford
  • M.F. Kimmitt
    University of Essex, Physics Centre, Colchester
  • H.J. Schriber, M. Viti
    DESY Zeuthen, Zeuthen
  • N. Shales, A. Sopczak
    Microwave Research Group, Lancaster University, Lancaster
  • N. Sinev, E.T. Torrence
    University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon
  • M. Slater, M.T. Thomson, D.R. Ward
    University of Cambridge, Cambridge
  • Y. Sugimoto
    KEK, Ibaraki
  • S. Walston
    LLNL, Livermore, California
  • T. Weiland
    TEMF, Darmstadt
  • M. Wendt
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois
  • I. Zagorodnov
    DESY, Hamburg
  • F. Zimmermann
    CERN, Geneva
 
  The SLAC Linac can deliver to End Station A a high-energy test beam with similar beam parameters as for the International Linear Collider for bunch charge, bunch length and bunch energy spread. ESA beam tests run parasitically with PEP-II with single damped bunches at 10Hz, beam energy of 28.5 GeV and bunch charge of (1.5-2.0)·1010 electrons. A 5-day commissioning run was performed in January 2006, followed by a 2-week run in April. We describe the beamline configuration and beam setup for these runs, and give an overview of the tests being carried out. These tests include studies of collimator wakefields, prototype energy spectrometers, prototype beam position monitors for the ILC Linac, and characterization of beam-induced electro-magnetic interference along the ESA beamline.  
WEPCH141 Accelerator Physics Code Web Repository 2254
 
  • F. Zimmermann, R. Basset, E. Benedetto, U. Dorda, M. Giovannozzi, Y. Papaphilippou, T. Pieloni, F. Ruggiero, G. Rumolo, F. Schmidt, E. Todesco
    CERN, Geneva
  • D.T. Abell
    Tech-X, Boulder, Colorado
  • R. Bartolini
    Diamond, Oxfordshire
  • O. Boine-Frankenheim, G. Franchetti, I. Hofmann
    GSI, Darmstadt
  • Y. Cai, M.T.F. Pivi
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California
  • Y.H. Chin, K. Ohmi, K. Oide
    KEK, Ibaraki
  • S.M. Cousineau, V.V. Danilov, J.A. Holmes, A.P. Shishlo
    ORNL, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
  • L. Farvacque
    ESRF, Grenoble
  • A. Friedman
    LLNL, Livermore, California
  • M.A. Furman, D.P. Grote, J. Qiang, G.L. Sabbi, P.A. Seidl, J.-L. Vay
    LBNL, Berkeley, California
  • D. Kaltchev
    TRIUMF, Vancouver
  • T.C. Katsouleas
    USC, Los Angeles, California
  • E.-S. Kim
    PAL, Pohang, Kyungbuk
  • S. Machida
    CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon
  • J. Payet
    CEA, Gif-sur-Yvette
  • T. Sen
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois
  • J. Wei
    BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York
  • B. Zotter
    Honorary CERN Staff Member, Grand-Saconnex
 
  In the framework of the CARE HHH European Network, we have developed a web-based dynamic accelerator-physics code repository. We describe the design, structure and contents of this web repository, illustrate its usage, and discuss our future plans.