SRF2015 - List of Authors (Sakai, H.)

Paper	Title	Page
TUPB021	Measurement of the Cavity Performances of Compact ERL Main Linac Cryomodule During Beam Operation	592
	H. Sakai, M. Egi, K. Enami, T. Furuya, S. Michizono, T. Miura, F. Qiu, K. Shinoe, K. Umemori KEK, Ibaraki, Japan M. Sawamura JAEA, Ibaraki-ken, Japan
	We developed ERL main linac cryomodule for Compact ERL (cERL) in KEK. The module consists of two 9-cell 1.3 GHz superconducting cavities, two 20 kW high power coupler, two mechanical tuner and three HOM dampers. After construction of cERL recirculation loop, beam operation was started in 2013 Dec. First electron beam of 20 MeV successfully passed the main linac cavities. After adjusting beam optics, energy recovery operation was achieved. Main linac cavity was enough stable for ERL beam operation with digital LLRF system and energy recovery was successfully done with CW 80 uA beam. However, field emission was a problem for long term operation. In this paper, we express the measurement of the cavity performances of long term beam operation.
Export •	reference for this paper to ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text, ※ RIS/RefMan, ※ EndNote (xml)

THAA06	Precise Studies on He-Processing and HPR for Recovery From Field Emission by Using X-Ray Mapping System	1019
	H. Sakai, K. Enami, T. Furuya, M. Satoh, K. Shinoe, K. Umemori KEK, Ibaraki, Japan M. Sawamura JAEA, Ibaraki-ken, Japan
	We usually met the degradation of superconducting RF cavity on the cryomodule test and beam operation even if the performance of this cavity is good on the vertical test (V.T). Field emission is the most severe problem for this degradation after reassembly work from vertical test. Not only high pressure rinsing (HPR) but also He-processing, which is more suitable method without the reassembly work for recovery, is recommended and tried to recover this degradation. However, we did not investigate the details of how field emission sources were processed and removed after HPR and He-processing. We deeply investigated the processing procedure during He-processing and how many field emission sources removed after HPR by using rotating X-ray mapping system* in V.T . *H.Sakai et.al., Proc. of IPAC10 p2950-2952.
	Slides THAA06 [4.347 MB]
Export •	reference for this paper to ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text, ※ RIS/RefMan, ※ EndNote (xml)

Paper

Title

Page

Measurement of the Cavity Performances of Compact ERL Main Linac Cryomodule During Beam Operation

592

H. Sakai, M. Egi, K. Enami, T. Furuya, S. Michizono, T. Miura, F. Qiu, K. Shinoe, K. Umemori
KEK, Ibaraki, Japan
M. Sawamura
JAEA, Ibaraki-ken, Japan

We developed ERL main linac cryomodule for Compact ERL (cERL) in KEK. The module consists of two 9-cell 1.3 GHz superconducting cavities, two 20 kW high power coupler, two mechanical tuner and three HOM dampers. After construction of cERL recirculation loop, beam operation was started in 2013 Dec. First electron beam of 20 MeV successfully passed the main linac cavities. After adjusting beam optics, energy recovery operation was achieved. Main linac cavity was enough stable for ERL beam operation with digital LLRF system and energy recovery was successfully done with CW 80 uA beam. However, field emission was a problem for long term operation. In this paper, we express the measurement of the cavity performances of long term beam operation.

Export •

reference for this paper to ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text, ※ RIS/RefMan, ※ EndNote (xml)

THAA06

Precise Studies on He-Processing and HPR for Recovery From Field Emission by Using X-Ray Mapping System

1019

H. Sakai, K. Enami, T. Furuya, M. Satoh, K. Shinoe, K. Umemori
KEK, Ibaraki, Japan
M. Sawamura
JAEA, Ibaraki-ken, Japan

We usually met the degradation of superconducting RF cavity on the cryomodule test and beam operation even if the performance of this cavity is good on the vertical test (V.T). Field emission is the most severe problem for this degradation after reassembly work from vertical test. Not only high pressure rinsing (HPR) but also He-processing, which is more suitable method without the reassembly work for recovery, is recommended and tried to recover this degradation. However, we did not investigate the details of how field emission sources were processed and removed after HPR and He-processing. We deeply investigated the processing procedure during He-processing and how many field emission sources removed after HPR by using rotating X-ray mapping system* in V.T .
*H.Sakai et.al., Proc. of IPAC10 p2950-2952.

Slides THAA06 [4.347 MB]

Export •

reference for this paper to ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text, ※ RIS/RefMan, ※ EndNote (xml)