Author: Ingrassia, P.F.
Paper Title Page
MOP249 Improved Alarm Tracking for Better Accountability 579
 
  • S. Nemesure, T. D'Ottavio, L.R. Hammons, P.F. Ingrassia, N.A. Kling, G.J. Marr, T.C. Shrey
    BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
An alarm system is a vital component of any accelerator, as it provides a warning that some element of the system is not functioning properly. The severity and age of the alarm may sometimes signify whether urgent or deferred attention is required. For example, older alarms may inadvertently be given a lower priority if an assumption is made that someone else is already investigating it, whereas those that are more current may indicate the need for an immediate response. The alarm history also provides valuable information regarding the functionality of the overall system, thus careful tracking of these data is likely to improve response time and remove uncertainty about the current status. Since one goal of every alarm display is to be free of alarms, a clear and concise presentation of an alarm along with useful historic annotations can help the end user address the warning more quickly. By defining a discrete set of very specific alarm states and by utilizing database resources to maintain a complete and easily accessible alarm history, we anticipate a decrease in down time due to more efficient operator response and management of alarms.
 
 
THP054 Medium Energy Heavy Ion Operations at RHIC 2220
 
  • K.A. Drees, L. A. Ahrens, M. Bai, J. Beebe-Wang, I. Blackler, M. Blaskiewicz, J.M. Brennan, K.A. Brown, D. Bruno, J.J. Butler, C. Carlson, R. Connolly, T. D'Ottavio, W. Fischer, W. Fu, D.M. Gassner, M. Harvey, T. Hayes, H. Huang, R.L. Hulsart, P.F. Ingrassia, N.A. Kling, M. Lafky, J.S. Laster, R.C. Lee, V. Litvinenko, Y. Luo, W.W. MacKay, M. Mapes, G.J. Marr, A. Marusic, K. Mernick, R.J. Michnoff, M.G. Minty, C. Montag, J. Morris, C. Naylor, S. Nemesure, F.C. Pilat, V. Ptitsyn, G. Robert-Demolaize, T. Roser, P. Sampson, T. Satogata, V. Schoefer, C. Schultheiss, F. Severino, T.C. Shrey, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, P. Thieberger, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, J.E. Tuozzolo, M. Wilinski, A. Zaltsman, K. Zeno, S.Y. Zhang
    BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
As part of the search for a phase transition or critical point on the QCD phase diagram, an energy scan including 5 different energy settings was performed during the 2010 RHIC heavy ion run. While the top beam energy for heavy ions is at 100 GeV/n and the lowest achieved energy setpoint was significantly below RHICs injection energy of approximately 10 GeV/n, we also provided beams for data taking in a medium energy range above injection energy and below top beam energy. This paper reviews RHIC experience and challenges for RHIC medium energy operations that produced full experimental data sets at beam energies of 31.2 GeV/n and 19.5 GeV/n.