Paper | Title | Page |
---|---|---|
TU5RFP006 | Beam Transport and Diagnostics for the NSLS-II Injection System | 1096 |
|
||
The NSLS II is a state of the art 3 GeV synchrotron light source being developed at BNL. The injection system will consist of a 200 MeV linac and a 3GeVbooster synchrotron. The transport lines between the linac and booster (LtB) and the booster and storage ring (BtS) must satify a number of requirements. In addition to transporting the beam while mantaining the beam emittance, these lines must allow for commissioning, provide appropriate diagnostics, allow for the appropriate safety devices and and in the case of the BtS line, provide for a stable beam for top off injection. Appropriate diagnostics are also necessary in the linac and booster to complement the measurements in the transfer lines. In this paper we discuss the design of the transfer lines for the NSLSII along with the incorporated diagnostics and safety systems. Necessary diagnostics in the linac and booster are also discussed. |
||
TU5RFP009 | NSLS-II Pulsed Magnet Design Considerations | 1105 |
|
||
NSLS-II injection system contains 13 pulsed magnets and their power supplies for injection in and extraction from the booster and injection in the storage ring. Requirement of having injection process transparent for the NSLS-II users translates into challenging specifications for the pulsed magnet design. To keep the beam jitter within 10% of radiation source size, relative kicker mismatch must be kept on 10-5 level and residual vertical field must be below few gauss in amplitude. In this paper we discuss specifications for the pulsed magnets, their preliminary design and parameters' tolerances. |
||
TU5RFP012 | Alternative Designs of the NSLS-II Injection Straight Section | 1114 |
|
||
The NSLS-II is a state of the art 3 GeV synchrotron light source that is being developed at BNL. The 9.3 meter long injection straight section of NSLS-II storage ring currently fits a conventional injection set-up that consists of four kickers producing a closed bump together with a DC septum and a pulsed septum. In this paper we analyze alternative options based on: a) injection via a pulsed sextupole and b) injection with a Lambertson septum. We discuss dynamics of the injected and stored beams and, consequently, magnet specifications and tolerances. In conclusion we summarize advantages and drawbacks of each injection scheme. |