Author: Veitzer, S.A.
Paper Title Page
TUOAA01 3-Dimensional Modeling of Electron Clouds in Non-uniform Magnetic Fields 1059
 
  • S.A. Veitzer, P. Stoltz
    Tech-X, Boulder, Colorado, USA
  • J.A. Crittenden, K.G. Sonnad
    CLASSE, Ithaca, New York, USA
 
  Funding: This work was performed under the auspices of the Department of Energy as part of the ComPASS SCiDAC-2 project (DE-FC02-07ER41499) and by the National Science Foundation Grant PHY-0734867.
Electron clouds have the potential to pose serious limitations on accelerator performance in both hadron and lepton beams. Experiments using rf diagnostics are being performed to measure electron cloud densities at a number of accelerator facilities. However, it is difficult to calibrate plasma density with signal strength in these experiments, and modeling involves a number of technical and numerical challenges. Typically 2-Dimensional electrostatic methods have been used to model cloud buildup under beam crossing conditions. However, since traveling-wave rf experiments typically occur over many meters of beam pipe where magnetic fields are changing, one needs to develop 3-Dimensional electromagnetic models in order to accurately simulate rf diagnostics. We have developed accurate models of electron cloud-induced phase shifts in rf in a system with spatially varying magnetic field configurations using the plasma simulation code VORPAL. We present here results for measuring phase shifts in the CESR wiggler with realistic, spatially non-uniform magnetic field configurations.
 
slides icon Slides TUOAA01 [18.367 MB]  
 
THEPPB013 Progress in Modeling Arcs 3260
 
  • J. Norem, Z. Insepov
    ANL, Argonne, USA
  • S. Mahalingam, S.A. Veitzer
    Tech-X, Boulder, Colorado, USA
  • A. Moretti
    Fermilab, Batavia, USA
  • I. Morozov, G.E. Norman
    JIHT RAS, Moscow, Russia
 
  Funding: DOE Office of High Energy Physics.
We are continuing to extend and simplify our understanding of vacuum arcs. We believe that all the breakdown phenomena we see (with and without B fields) can be explained by: 1) fracture due to electrostatic forces at surface crack junctions, 2) the development of a unipolar arc driven by the cavity electric field, and 3) cooling, and cracking of the surface after the event is finished. Recent progress includes the evaluation of non-Debye sheaths using Molecular Dynamics, studies of sheath driven instabilities, a model of degradation of gradient limits in strong B fields, analysis of the variety of arcs that can occur in cavities and their damage and further studies of breakdown triggers.