IPAC2012 - List of Authors (Henderson, S.)

Paper

Title

Page

Thorium Energy Futures

29

S. Peggs, W. Horak, T. Roser
BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York, USA
V.B. Ashley, R.F. Ashworth
Jacobs Engineering, Pasadena, USA
R.J. Barlow, R. Cywinski, R. Seviour
University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom
J.-L. Biarrotte
IPN, Orsay, France
S. Henderson
Fermilab, Batavia, USA
A. Hutton
JLAB, Newport News, Virginia, USA
J. Kelly
Thor Energy, Oslo, Norway
M. Lindroos
ESS, Lund, Sweden
P.M. McIntyre
Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
A. Norlin
IThEO, Sweden
H.L. Owen
STFC/DL/ASTeC, Daresbury, Warrington, Cheshire, United Kingdom
G.T. Parks
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

The potential for thorium as an alternative or supplement to uranium in fission power generation has long been recognised, and several reactors, of various types, have already operated using thorium-based fuels. Accelerator Driven Subcritical (ADS) systems have benefits and drawbacks when compared to conventional critical thorium reactors, for both solid and molten salt fuels. None of the four options – liquid or solid, with or without an accelerator – can yet be rated as better or worse than the other three, given today's knowledge. We outline the research that will be necessary to lead to an informed choice.

Slides MOOBA01 [3.887 MB]

WEIC06

Accelerator R&D: Research for Science - Science for Society

2161

N.R. Holtkamp
SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
S. Biedron, S.V. Milton
CSU, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
L. Boeh, J.E. Clayton, G. Zdasiuk
VMS GTC, Palo Alto, California, USA
S.A. Gourlay, M.S. Zisman
LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
R.W. Hamm
R&M Technical Enterprises, Pleasanton, California, USA
S. Henderson
Fermilab, Batavia, USA
G.H. Hoffstaetter
CLASSE, Ithaca, New York, USA
L. Merminga
TRIUMF, Canada's National Laboratory for Particle and Nuclear Physics, Vancouver, Canada
S. Ozaki
BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York, USA
F.C. Pilat
JLAB, Newport News, Virginia, USA
M. White
ANL, Argonne, USA

In September 2011 the US Senate Appropriations Committee requested a ten-year strategic plan from the Department of Energy (DOE) that would describe how accelerator R&D today could advance applications directly relevant to society. Based on the 2009 workshop "Accelerators for America’s Future" an assessment was made on how accelerator technology developed by the nation’s laboratories and universities could directly translate into a competitive strength for industrial partners and a variety of government agencies in the research, defense and national security sectors. The Office of High Energy Physics, traditionally the steward for advanced accelerator R&D within DOE, commissioned a task force under its auspices to generate and compile ideas on how best to implement strategies that would help fulfill the needs of industry and other agencies, while maintaining focus on its core mission of fundamental science investigation.

Slides WEIC06 [3.678 MB]

THPPP090

Project X Functional Requirements Specification

3945

S.D. Holmes, S. Henderson, R.D. Kephart, J.S. Kerby, I. Kourbanis, V.A. Lebedev, C.S. Mishra, S. Nagaitsev, N. Solyak, R.S. Tschirhart
Fermilab, Batavia, USA

Funding: Work supported by the Fermi Research Alliance, under contract to the U.S. Department of Energy.
Project X is a multi-megawatt proton facility being developed to support a world-leading program in Intensity Frontier physics at Fermilab. The facility is designed to support programs in elementary particle and nuclear physics, with possible applications to nuclear energy research. A Functional Requirements Specification has been developed in order to establish performance criteria for the Project X complex in support of these multiple missions, and to assure that the facility is designed with sufficient upgrade capability to provide U.S. leadership for many decades to come. This paper will describe the Functional Requirements for the Project X facility, their recent evolution, and the rationale for these requirements.

Paper	Title	Page
MOOBA01	Thorium Energy Futures	29
	S. Peggs, W. Horak, T. Roser BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York, USA V.B. Ashley, R.F. Ashworth Jacobs Engineering, Pasadena, USA R.J. Barlow, R. Cywinski, R. Seviour University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom J.-L. Biarrotte IPN, Orsay, France S. Henderson Fermilab, Batavia, USA A. Hutton JLAB, Newport News, Virginia, USA J. Kelly Thor Energy, Oslo, Norway M. Lindroos ESS, Lund, Sweden P.M. McIntyre Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA A. Norlin IThEO, Sweden H.L. Owen STFC/DL/ASTeC, Daresbury, Warrington, Cheshire, United Kingdom G.T. Parks University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
	The potential for thorium as an alternative or supplement to uranium in fission power generation has long been recognised, and several reactors, of various types, have already operated using thorium-based fuels. Accelerator Driven Subcritical (ADS) systems have benefits and drawbacks when compared to conventional critical thorium reactors, for both solid and molten salt fuels. None of the four options – liquid or solid, with or without an accelerator – can yet be rated as better or worse than the other three, given today's knowledge. We outline the research that will be necessary to lead to an informed choice.
	Slides MOOBA01 [3.887 MB]

WEIC06	Accelerator R&D: Research for Science - Science for Society	2161
	N.R. Holtkamp SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA S. Biedron, S.V. Milton CSU, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA L. Boeh, J.E. Clayton, G. Zdasiuk VMS GTC, Palo Alto, California, USA S.A. Gourlay, M.S. Zisman LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA R.W. Hamm R&M Technical Enterprises, Pleasanton, California, USA S. Henderson Fermilab, Batavia, USA G.H. Hoffstaetter CLASSE, Ithaca, New York, USA L. Merminga TRIUMF, Canada's National Laboratory for Particle and Nuclear Physics, Vancouver, Canada S. Ozaki BNL, Upton, Long Island, New York, USA F.C. Pilat JLAB, Newport News, Virginia, USA M. White ANL, Argonne, USA
	In September 2011 the US Senate Appropriations Committee requested a ten-year strategic plan from the Department of Energy (DOE) that would describe how accelerator R&D today could advance applications directly relevant to society. Based on the 2009 workshop "Accelerators for America’s Future" an assessment was made on how accelerator technology developed by the nation’s laboratories and universities could directly translate into a competitive strength for industrial partners and a variety of government agencies in the research, defense and national security sectors. The Office of High Energy Physics, traditionally the steward for advanced accelerator R&D within DOE, commissioned a task force under its auspices to generate and compile ideas on how best to implement strategies that would help fulfill the needs of industry and other agencies, while maintaining focus on its core mission of fundamental science investigation.
	Slides WEIC06 [3.678 MB]

THPPP090	Project X Functional Requirements Specification	3945
	S.D. Holmes, S. Henderson, R.D. Kephart, J.S. Kerby, I. Kourbanis, V.A. Lebedev, C.S. Mishra, S. Nagaitsev, N. Solyak, R.S. Tschirhart Fermilab, Batavia, USA
	Funding: Work supported by the Fermi Research Alliance, under contract to the U.S. Department of Energy. Project X is a multi-megawatt proton facility being developed to support a world-leading program in Intensity Frontier physics at Fermilab. The facility is designed to support programs in elementary particle and nuclear physics, with possible applications to nuclear energy research. A Functional Requirements Specification has been developed in order to establish performance criteria for the Project X complex in support of these multiple missions, and to assure that the facility is designed with sufficient upgrade capability to provide U.S. leadership for many decades to come. This paper will describe the Functional Requirements for the Project X facility, their recent evolution, and the rationale for these requirements.