Author: Qiang, J.
Paper Title Page
MOOHC2 The US Electron Ion Collider Accelerator Designs 1
 
  • A. Seryi, S.V. Benson, S.A. Bogacz, P.D. Brindza, M.W. Bruker, A. Camsonne, E. Daly, P. Degtiarenko, Y.S. Derbenev, M. Diefenthaler, J. Dolbeck, R. Ent, R. Fair, D. Fazenbaker, Y. Furletova, B.R. Gamage, D. Gaskell, R.L. Geng, P. Ghoshal, J.M. Grames, J. Guo, F.E. Hannon, L. Harwood, S. Henderson, H. Huang, A. Hutton, K. Jordan, D.H. Kashy, A.J. Kimber, G.A. Krafft, R. Lassiter, R. Li, F. Lin, M.A. Mamun, F. Marhauser, R. McKeown, T.J. Michalski, V.S. Morozov, P. Nadel-Turonski, E.A. Nissen, G.-T. Park, H. Park, M. Poelker, T. Powers, R. Rajput-Ghoshal, R.A. Rimmer, Y. Roblin, D. Romanov, P. Rossi, T. Satogata, M.F. Spata, R. Suleiman, A.V. Sy, C. Tennant, H. Wang, S. Wang, C. Weiss, M. Wiseman, W. Wittmer, R. Yoshida, H. Zhang, S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z.W. Zhao
    JLab, Newport News, Virginia, USA
  • D.T. Abell, D.L. Bruhwiler, I.V. Pogorelov
    RadiaSoft LLC, Boulder, Colorado, USA
  • E.C. Aschenauer, G. Bassi, J. Beebe-Wang, J.S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Blednykh, J.M. Brennan, S.J. Brooks, K.A. Brown, K.A. Drees, A.V. Fedotov, W. Fischer, D.M. Gassner, W. Guo, Y. Hao, A. Hershcovitch, H. Huang, W.A. Jackson, J. Kewisch, A. Kiselev, V. Litvinenko, C. Liu, H. Lovelace III, Y. Luo, F. Méot, M.G. Minty, C. Montag, R.B. Palmer, B. Parker, S. Peggs, V. Ptitsyn, V.H. Ranjbar, G. Robert-Demolaize, T. Roser, S. Seletskiy, V.V. Smaluk, K.S. Smith, S. Tepikian, P. Thieberger, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, E. Wang, W.-T. Weng, F.J. Willeke, H. Witte, Q. Wu, W. Xu, A. Zaltsman, W. Zhang
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
  • D.P. Barber
    DESY, Hamburg, Germany
  • I.V. Bazarov
    Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
  • G.I. Bell, J.R. Cary
    Tech-X, Boulder, Colorado, USA
  • Y. Cai, Y.M. Nosochkov, A. Novokhatski, G. Stupakov, M.K. Sullivan, C.-Y. Tsai
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
  • Z.A. Conway, M.P. Kelly, B. Mustapha, U. Wienands, A. Zholents
    ANL, Lemont, Illinois, USA
  • S.U. De Silva, J.R. Delayen, H. Huang, C. Hyde, S. Sosa, B. Terzić
    ODU, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
  • K.E. Deitrick, G.H. Hoffstaetter
    Cornell University (CLASSE), Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education, Ithaca, New York, USA
  • D. Douglas
    Douglas Consulting, York, Virginia, USA
  • V.G. Dudnikov, R.P. Johnson
    Muons, Inc, Illinois, USA
  • B. Erdelyi, P. Piot
    Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA
  • J.D. Fox
    Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
  • J. Gerity, T.L. Mann, P.M. McIntyre, N. Pogue, A. Sattarov
    Texas A&M University, College Station, USA
  • E. Gianfelice-Wendt, S. Nagaitsev
    Fermilab, Batavia, Illinois, USA
  • Y. Hao, P.N. Ostroumov, A.S. Plastun, R.C. York
    FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
  • T. Mastoridis
    CalPoly, San Luis Obispo, California, USA
  • J.D. Maxwell, R. Milner, M. Musgrave
    MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  • J. Qiang, G.L. Sabbi
    LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
  • D. Teytelman
    Dimtel, Redwood City, California, USA
  • R.C. York
    NSCL, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
 
  With the completion of the National Academies of Sciences Assessment of a US Electron-Ion Collider, the prospects for construction of such a facility have taken a step forward. This paper provides an overview of the two site-specific EIC designs: JLEIC (Jefferson Lab) and eRHIC (BNL) as well as brief overview of ongoing EIC R&D.  
slides icon Slides MOOHC2 [14.774 MB]  
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-MOOHC2  
About • paper received ※ 29 August 2019       paper accepted ※ 04 September 2019       issue date ※ 08 October 2019  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUPLO06 Weak-Strong Beam-Beam Simulation for eRHIC 545
 
  • Y. Luo, G. Bassi, M. Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, C. Montag, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
  • Y. Hao, D. Xu
    FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
  • J. Qiang
    LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
In the eRHIC, to compensate the geometric luminosity loss due to the crossing angle, crab cavities are to be installed on both sides of the interaction point. When the proton bunch length is comparable to the wavelength of its crab cavities, protons will not be perfectly tilted in the x-z plane. In the article, we employ weak-strong beam-beam interaction model to calculate the proton beam size growth rates and luminosity degradation rate with various machine and time parameters. The goal of these studies is to optimize the the beam-beam related machine and beam parameters of eRHIC.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-TUPLO06  
About • paper received ※ 29 August 2019       paper accepted ※ 03 September 2019       issue date ※ 08 October 2019  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
TUPLO07 Calculation of Action Diffusion With Crabbed Collision in eRHIC 549
 
  • Y. Luo, G. Bassi, M. Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, C. Montag, V. Ptitsyn, F.J. Willeke
    BNL, Upton, New York, USA
  • Y. Hao, D. Xu
    FRIB, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
  • J. Qiang
    LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
In the eRHIC, to compensate the geometric luminosity loss due to the crossing angle, crab cavities are to be installed on both sides of the interaction point. When the proton bunch length is comparable to the wavelength of its crab cavities, protons will not be perfectly tilted in the x-z plane. In the article, we develop a simulation code to calculate the transverse action diffusion rate as function of the initial proton longitudinal action. The goal of this study is to identify the contributions from various protons to the overall emittance growth. Tune scan is also performed to locate optimum working points which yield less proton emittance growth.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-TUPLO07  
About • paper received ※ 29 August 2019       paper accepted ※ 03 September 2019       issue date ※ 08 October 2019  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
WEPLS05 Simulation Analysis of the LCLS-II Injector using ACE3P and IMPACT 779
 
  • D.A. Bizzozero, J. Qiang
    LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
  • L. Ge, Z. Li, C.-K. Ng, L. Xiao
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
 
  Funding: This work is supported by the Director of the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy under contracts DEAC02-05CH11231 and DE-AC02-76-SF00515.
The LCLS-II beam injector system consists of a 186 MHz normal-conducting RF gun, a two-cell 1.3 GHz normal-conducting buncher cavity, two transverse focusing solenoids, and eight 1.3 GHz 9-cell Tesla-like super-conducting booster cavities. With a coordinated effort between LBNL and SLAC, we have developed a simulation workflow combining the electromagnetic field solvers from ACE3P with the beam dynamics modeling code IMPACT. This workflow will be used to improve performance and minimize beam emittance for given accelerator structures through iterative optimization. In our current study, we use this workflow to compare beam quality parameters between using 2D axisymmetric field profiles and fully 3D non-axisymmetric fields caused by geometrical asymmetries (e.g. RF coupler ports).
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-WEPLS05  
About • paper received ※ 20 August 2019       paper accepted ※ 04 September 2019       issue date ※ 08 October 2019  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)  
 
WEPLE02 Integrated Accelerator Simulation with Electromagnetics and Beam Physics Codes 885
 
  • L. Ge, Z. Li, C.-K. Ng, L. Xiao
    SLAC, Menlo Park, California, USA
  • D.A. Bizzozero, J. Qiang, J.-L. Vay
    LBNL, Berkeley, California, USA
  • D.P. Grote
    LLNL, Livermore, California, USA
 
  Funding: Work supported by US Department of Energy under contracts AC02-76SF00515, DE-AC02-05CH11231 and DE-AC52-07NA27344. Used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center.
This paper presents an integrated simulation capability for accelerators including electromagnetic field and beam dynamics effects. The integrated codes include the parallel finite-element code suite ACE3P for electromagnetic field calculation of beamline components, the parallel particle-in-cell (PIC) code IMPACT for beamline particle tracking with space-charge effects, and the parallel self-consistent PIC code Warp for beam and plasma simulations. The common data format OpenPMD has been adopted for efficient field and particle I/O data transfer between codes. One application is to employ ACE3P and IMPACT for studying beam qualities in accelerator beamlines. Another is to combine ACE3P and Warp for investigating plasma processing for operational performance of RF cavities. A module for mapping the CAD geometry used in ACE3P to Warp Cartesian grid representation has been developed. Furthermore, a workflow has been implemented that enables the execution of integrated simulation on HPC systems. Examples for simulation of the LCLS-II injector using ACE3P-IMPACT and plasma ignition in SRF cavities using ACE3P-Warp will be presented.
 
DOI • reference for this paper ※ https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-NAPAC2019-WEPLE02  
About • paper received ※ 20 August 2019       paper accepted ※ 19 November 2019       issue date ※ 08 October 2019  
Export • reference for this paper using ※ BibTeX, ※ LaTeX, ※ Text/Word, ※ RIS, ※ EndNote (xml)